User talk:Arnav5326

Welcome!

Hello, Arnav5326, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sadhana Singh did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Geniac (talk) 05:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to JioCinema did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! - AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 20:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sumedh Mudgalkar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Naushervan. I noticed that you deleted content from an article, Arnab Goswami, but did not provide any edit summary. I can also see that this has happened before on other pages. Please refrain from unexplained content removal. See WP:REMOVAL for more information. Thanks. - Naushervan (talk) 11:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fukrey 3, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 21:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Republic TV, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 23:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Republic TV. Materialscientist (talk) 03:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries and sources for your edits

Hi Arnav5326, it's important to include edit summaries and sources for your edits. This helps maintain transparency and credibility on Wikipedia. Please remember to provide these for your future contributions. Thank you! RevenueDPT ✉ 06:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Newslinger talk 23:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello by TruxtVerified

Hello, I'd like to invite you to edit the Star Gold Network, Nazara TV, 24 News, Republic Kannada & Sun Direct GO articles, which I created. Could you help expand it and add more references? TruxtVerified (talk) 11:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Republic Media Network for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republic Media Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic Media Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charlie (talk) 04:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aastha TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 - again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Vaccine War. - Arjayay (talk) 10:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But there is no authentic source to prove 9.47 crore is correct collection as its of 10 October 23 but vaccine war was running even after thT Achathikhai (talk) 20:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Republic TV, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Hello, you recently edited Republic TV and Sudarshan News to remove the term "Right-wing" news channels. Please avoid this kind of edits without discussion. Also, please do not remove maintenance tags unless the issue has been resolved. Wikiuser13 (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Khichdi 2: Mission Paanthukistan, you may be blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Republic TV. Most of your edit does not contain an edit summary. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 06:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dabangg 3. This is your final warning. Further edits without a source or changing away from the sourced number and you WILL be reported to WP:AIV for your continued vandalism. You've been warned quite a few times and ignored all of these warnings. STOP. YOU WILL BE BLOCKED IF THUIS CONTINUES. Ravensfire (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kick (2014 film). Again, STOP changing box office numbers away from sourced information. This is disruptive and has been going on for a while. It WILL NOT be tolerated any longer. Ravensfire (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Sudarshan News, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 13:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me, I will never change extra things. I will change only important and genuine content... Arnav5326 (talk) 17:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]