Jump to content

User talk:AdamDeanHall/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome

Hello, AdamDeanHall/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you will enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can sign your name on talk and voting pages using four tildes, (~~~~), which produces your username, the time, and the date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- getcrunk ? 18:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

CW Schedule

First, attitude. Second, are you really updating it weekly? That isn't encyclopedia worthy. I updated it to reflect the season schedule, which is much more important than weekly changes. But, hey, if you will personally update it every week, be my guest. That was my reasoning and I think it makes more sense, but I certainly will not change the schedule every week. Weekly schedules can be gathered at TV.com or other such niche sites. Wikipedia is not anyone's personal TV guide, or rather is not intended to be. Again, these are my thoughts. Thank you for keeping such a close eye on it though. Tebor 19:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

Removing an AfD template constitutes vandalism.

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism has shown you to be intent on doing harm to Wikipedia. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BlueValour 21:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. — getcrunk what?! 22:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Blanking

Please do not blank text from the page, as you did by removing the hex code from Desperate Housewives Matthew Fenton (contribs) 12:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


WLVI-TV

I'm sorry, but promos for the fall on WLVI-TV refer to the station as "Boston's CW", and there is a Boston's CW logo (though they have yet to put it up on their website). Alas, that is not the same as "CW56". Could you please cite a source on a CW56 branding, or at least explain why it would be branded as such. Thank you for your understanding. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Your stance on Tale of Two Cities

Hey, just a word here: you'd be much more effective, in Wikipedia overall, if you'd please participate on the relevant talk pages, rather than continue to revert things that other editors are questioning. This is what the talk pages are for. Also, I'd suggest that you avoid all-caps in your edit summaries, and keep them as cool as you can. Thanks, PKtm 19:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey; back again. Please do not insert Kate as the flashback character on List of Lost episodes, without a verifiable, reliable source. Spoilerfix.com is not considered reliable. I and others will continue to revert this repeated insertion. Thanks, !!!!

ITV2, 3 and 4

Will you stop re-adding every single programme shown on ITV2, 3 and 4!!! It will grow larger and larger and will be uncontrolable, and it makes the articles look a mess. --GMc 16:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Novelization vs. novelisation

I reverted your spelling changes on Licence to Kill as WP:STYLE indicates that we're supposed to use British spellings on British topics, and James Bond films and books are considered British topics, so spellings such as "novelisation" are correct. 23skidoo 18:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Edits

Hi instead of making 5 or 6 edits for each time you want to edit can you just make 1 and also use the show preview button? thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 14:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

WGN-TV

In case you didn't read my edit comments, the WB ends this evening (Sunday) at 10 PM Eastern/9 PM Central. That means WGN-TV and all the others are still WB affiliates until then. Please stop changing this fact. Rollosmokes 21:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

WGN-TV

Hi Adam,

Is there a reason you reverted my edit on WGN-TV? Usually, when we revert to an earlier version, we use an edit summary, so the person whose edit was reverted will know why. As it is, you've placed the image back into a gallery of logos. As it is likely the galleries will be deleted, placing an image in a gallery of logos will likely only result in its deletion. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 17:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Baywatch

Hi, thanks for your help on the List of Baywatch episodes. Have you considered signing up to the WP:Baywatch Project Samaster1991 09:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The Three Stooges

Please stop removing the following text from the Three Stooges article:


The Spike TV official website still has their page for The Three Stooges, so they have not dropped the show. If they had, then the Stooges page would not exist.

I have reverted your edits for now until we can get a handle on this. I appreciate your understanding. -- M (speak/spoken) 20:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Children and Art

Hello AdamDeanHall. Please stop adding "Mark Moses appears as Paul Young" to the respective individual episode. Since I and other editors have said, there is no source that determines this and we need citation in order to post specific peices of information. If you would like to add any feedback, please state your reason on the Talk:List of Desperate Housewives episodes talk page, otherwise, you are violating the 3RR (3 revert rule) [since I and other editors have reverted the edits several times], and you could be possibly revoking a revert war, which could get you blocked. Thanks. Cheater1908 21:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi I can't believe that article didn't yet exist! I was actually in California when they were filming that and I was about 15 yards away from Christopher Lloyd and around the whole crew on a pier in Santa Barbara but you know what that film must have taken ages to film as this was in June 1997!! Are you interested in helping me out on wikipedia in film? Just stubbing older films in the way you have. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Bond 22

Hi. We can't list what we think might happen, only what we know is going to happen. Mark83 21:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Secrets of A Small Town

ABC never picked up the series so it will not be on the sechedule. Please stop putting on the sechedule.

DH

Talk:List_of_Desperate_Housewives_episodes#Present_caps_have_to_be_changed thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 15:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Six Degrees

You may not know this but Wikipedia is not censored. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

DiResta

A tag has been placed on DiResta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rocket71048576 20:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of David Lagana

An editor has nominated David Lagana, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lagana and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Spike_TV.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Nick Gas (Rewind Channel)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tazz765 17:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy

Hi. Be aware Wikipedia goes by _original airdates_ not _original American airdates_ - Please do not change episode two to the 28th again, it isn't correct. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

You've made 3 reversions as well by the way, any more will be a violation of WP:3RR. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Why have you changed episode 01 to the 28th? ABC aired episode 01 of season three on the 21st. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 15:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Note the changes made in [1]. Please be nice to IPs that try to correct info here. Agathoclea 20:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

It is considered to be in poor taste to try to get those who disagree (correctly) with you banned, as you did here. — MichaelLinnear 01:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives

Hi! Richard Burgi (Karl Meyer) and Doug Savant (Tom Scavo) were regulars, but not starring actors in DH during season one - if you watch any of the episodes they appear in you can see that they are credited as "Guest stars" - hence I correct you edits and have them both listed as starring actors beginning with season 2. Thanx! Pjär80 15:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Alex Boylan article may be deleted

A tag has been placed on Alex Boylan (actor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DoorsAjar 07:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


G4 shows list

If you were gonna take out the "-" marker, then why didn't you bother to think of a new one?

Hulk

Do you have a source for the season 2 DVD?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind, I saw where you put it in.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Mike's younger brother

Hi Adam. You asked why Mike's younger brother isn't appearing in the season finale; that's because the writers have decided to wait and introduce him in the fall :-) Cheater1908 01:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Little Mermaid III Voice Cast

You recently edited the The Little Mermaid III voice cast selection. I made a large edit to it a few days ago, trying to cite every actor in that list because it was way out of hand. Don't take this the wrong way, but I have reverted your edits due to the lack of sources. If you have a reliable source could you please link it next the actors name? Thanks. - 202.180.71.20 06:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Droids/Ewoks

Where is your source that 20th Century FOX currently has no plans to release complete sets of these? The Wookieepedian 20:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Traveler Premiere Date

Traveler will have a sneak preview of the pilot on May 10 then it will air a repeat of the pilot on May 30 followed by new episodes every wednesday after that. [2]

Morty Flickman

About the creation of the article Morty Flickman. IMO there is hardly need for this article to be created - the character has appeared in 3 episodes of Desperate Housewives and there is only four lines written about him in List of Desperate Housewives characters. The number of articles on individual DH characters is already growing out out of hand.

It would be highly appriciated to hear your opinion in this matter. See also the discussion on Talk:Rick Coletti.

Pjär80 15:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

ABC

I look at TheFutonCritic (Breaking news), that usually tells the latest news (such as cancellations). Matthew 20:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Spike_TV.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Spike_TV.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 23:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:V Mars

I dunnoCheers—Illyria05 Ring•Contrib. 23:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

By the way, if you are not sure Spike TV will acquire the rights, then why are you adding this to the V Mars article?Cheers—Illyria05 Ring•Contrib. 23:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

SpikeTV

I'm not American, so I don't really know. But, I'd guess The CW will hold on to VM for the time being (for repeats, etc). Matthew 23:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Traveler

I'm looking for them as well -- if I find them I'll tell you. Matthew 14:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Cyborg Cop III

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Cyborg Cop III, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.162.26.213 03:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Schedules

One, please don't threaten. Two, schedules are prohibited underWP:NOT#DIR, please look into those rules. - NeutralHomer T:C 20:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

ABC Schedule

The NBA Finals on ABC are over so the schedule is back to normal programming. So no more NBA Finals for this year.

List of schedules on ABC/NBC/CBS pages

Wikipedia is NOT a TV guide. These schedules violate WP:NOT, and more specifically Wikipedia is not an electronic program guide. Having general schedules is one thing, but putting in each week's schedule violates the very tenants of Wikipedia. I will be removing them from each of those pages, and if you persist in replacing them, I will take this to administrative arbitration. Please do not make overt threats when I'm specifically citing WP policy for my actions; in addition, the entries I am citing are specifically geared toward the existence of television program guide material.

A general list of a network's schedule was noted as okay in a previous AfD, but the specifics of the AfD indicate that the type of guide material that I have previously removed are not permitted under WP:NOT. --Mhking 00:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Boom! (TV series)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Boom! (TV series), by Jddphd (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Boom! (TV series) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Boom! (TV series), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Boom! (TV series) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Hidden Palms Vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hidden Palms, you will be blocked from editing. Stickeylabel 01:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Hidden Palms

This website has Fast National for 20 June, but only the Nielsen score for 8PM. This page has the Fast National for 27 June... but only 8PM again. Matthew 15:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

regards your msg

Hey, It wasn't my petition. I came across it and figured it'd be good to add it. MMAfan2007 21:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Spider-Man 3

Please read the paragraph above the "Box office performance" subsection. The information is already there. Please stop adding redundant information. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

It's already in the article. Alientraveller 17:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Re; Would you please block the guy who's been messing with the ABC schedules?

Matthew is not now, nor will he ever be, (thank all that is good in this world), an admin and cannot block anyone.

User talk:76.224.32.227

Please be careful not to bite the newbies like you did here. First, threating a user can scary off editors that could help the project later. Second, we rarely indefinitely block IPs. Third, Matthew isn't an administrator and can't block users. Remember that you were new at one time. Thank you! ~ Wikihermit 16:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


TRAVELER

there was no word yet if it is cancelled...

Desperate Housewives Project?

Hi there! Since you have contributed a lot to make the Desperate Housewives articles on WP better, I just thought I'd mention that a Desperate Housewives Project might be coming about. (Just incase you have missed it). If you are intrested, please feel free to express your intrest here. Cheers! Pjär80 22:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Godzilla titles

The original titles in the Godzilla movies were appropriately based on the Japanese original titles. Please do not change titles of movies in articles simply because the American titles are different. Godzilla is a Japanese show, and the Japanese titles are the ones that should be used. -Mecha DarkWarrior Sunday, August 26, 2007, 2:02 AM EST

DVD non-news

(1) We don't say what's "currently" not happening because what's current when you write it isn't current next month. Say "As of September, 2007." (2) Don't report non-news (e.g., no plans to release DVD) without citing a verifiable source. Wryspy 09:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


The article The Wild Brunch has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MastCell Talk 21:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Why is the List of programs broadcast by MyNetworkTV page considered for deletion?

Please see my reply. DHowell 21:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

"Future" programs for Toon Disney

Please provide sources if you are reporting the addition of programs to a station. Thank you. 24.4.131.142 20:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Upcoming Desperate Housewives episodes

Please don't add any details upon upcoming episodes until there is encyclopedic sources for them. It's crucial in order to keep the DH articles in Wikipedia standard. Hope you understand :) Pjär80 22:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Superman IV: The Quest for Peace

Hi there. I have reverted your edit on Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. You added Superman Returns as a sequel, yet there is a comment in the article which states that "It was decided, on the Superman Returns Talk Page, that there is no clear connection, other than homages, to any of the films in this series, and Superman Returns is the beginning of its own franchise. As such, indicating that it comes after Superman II, or Superman IV, or vice versa would be incorrect." Please be aware of any such comments in articles that you edit in future. Thanks. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 12:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The Little Mermaid III

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Little Mermaid III, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 22:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Little Mermaid III

The Little Mermaid III, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that The Little Mermaid III satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Mermaid III (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of The Little Mermaid III during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 12:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Susan Mayer

Hello, AdamDeanHall. Check out the Susan Mayer talk page. Her article should be named Susan Mayer for good reason, just as the Gabrielle Solis article should be named Garbrielle Solis. As for Bree Van de Kamp, well, nothing has been decided there, but I would say that her article should be titled Bree Van de Kamp either way. You moved this article (the Susan Mayer article) without checking on the talk page (I'm assuming you either didn't check or didn't care) for why this article was listed back at Susan Mayer. Well, I've changed it back to Susan Mayer once more, because that's what this article should be named. For further discussion, engage on the talk page of this article. Flyer22 17:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

I noticed the message you recently left to a newcomer. Please remember to try not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Chuck Sirloin 21:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I notice you've been removing the redlinks at List of Desperate Housewives episodes; please see WP:RED and hopefully that'll clarify why they should be kept. •97198 talk 06:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Plot summaries

Why are you removing contents for articles, and replacing them with "TBA" (to be added)? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

It's due to the current writers strike. The stories previously proposed may be changed. 203.221.239.155 (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning

A tag has been placed on The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 21:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Kids' WB

Here's what I have to say for myself editing Kids' WB... Check your local listings. I had a hard time believing it too at first, but then I saw the commercial during Eon Kid last Saturday as well... Teen Titans really is returning to Kids' WB!, believe it or not. Matty-chan (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Cavemen

Please do not keep adding "on hiatus" to Cavemen (TV series). It is not the standard nomenclature for when a production is on hiatus. -- Scjessey 23:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I have AGAIN reverted your "on hiatus" term. Please stop adding it. -- Scjessey (talk) 01:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Dates in Court TV

How about dropping an edit summary to explain your thinking? Did you read mine? --CliffC 01:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Desperate Hiatus

You cannot make a broad statement about viewers being left wondering because not all viewers are wondering. A large amount have already guessed. People are guessing more than they are wondering. The statement is POV so it's been removed as such. Thank you for understanding. IrishLass (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Something's Coming

Why did you give me a waning about vandalizing wikipedia concerning the summary of 'Something's Coming'? I was using the official description from the main website. It was perfectly accurate and in no way vandalising. -- Evmark 14:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Victor Lang

Victor Lang is not dead, because some spoilers confirm that he survived the tornado, so I won't get used to it thank you very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.35.99 (talk) 14:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Nick GAS

Yes, it was scheduled to go off the air on December 31st, and it did. However, it went back on the air an hour or two later because of Dish Network's refusal to change it to The N for whatever reason. Since the network is still broadcasting programs as of right now, no date should be added until either: A: The switch is made and The N begins broadcasting on Nick GAS's old station number, or B: Nick GAS stays on the channel lineup, but goes off air. (As in, broadcasting nothing but a black screen, color bars or any other test signals.) When either of these happen, (and they will happen), then we'll add the date. DietLimeCola (talk) 14:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Excuse me but what are you talking about? I was correcting the spelling of Kayla Scavo which was spelled "Scalvo". I would never vandalize a page and I did not create the narrations section. And I didn't appreciate your message when it was intended to be a good faith edit. Please check the history log before you start accusing people of things they didn't do. 68.197.92.64 (talk) 01:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism? Again

Do you just accuse everybody of vandalism if they put something different to you? I'm the one who wrote the whole thing for Welcome to Kanagawa, and it's an accurate description. The user above rightly corrected a spelling error, but I don't agree with you messaging me saying I 'vandalised' a page when I merely put it back to how I wrote it because it had been changed. I also do not understand how putting in the narration from Mary Alice is vandalising as it is relevant to the episode. EvMark 13:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I tend to agree that while some edits were misguided, a problem corrected with some gentle instruction, calling what was done vandalism is incorrect. Your addition of "but that's another story..." violates POV and some could call that vandalism. Because nothing is written or filmed beyond what has aired, stating that there is another story is not verifiable and smacks of opinion. Please refrain from adding what was not seen and what is not known. Personal summations are not for Wikipedia articles. Thank you. IrishLass (talk) 15:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Your moves that go against consensus

I've addressed you about this type of action of yours before, as seen above in this link. Basically, all that's said there in that link applies to the Bree Van de Kamp article as well now that consensus has been formed for what her article should be titled. Do not go against this consensus again. Better yet, try to start abiding by Wikipedia's common name policy that is cited on her talk page at this moment. If you have something to say about the matter of the Bree Van de Kamp article, then visit her talk page. In fact, visit talk pages more often. If you don't check talk pages before you do things like moving an article against Wikipedia policy or consensus, then you should start doing so. Flyer22 (talk) 08:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Who Gets the Dog?

What exactly are you going on about? I'm intrigued. Brochco (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see your point now. However, that was a good faith edit, even though I unfortunately messed it up slightly. Furthermore, it was made several weeks ago. I suggest in future you should be more clear if you have a problem with somebody's edits, and I would like you to have the courage to add an apology to your original condemnation of my decision. Thank you. Brochco (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

What???

All I did was add her persondata. What was that for? миражinred (speak, my child...) 22:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:PERSONDATA. Removal of persondata, or any other information for that matter is vandalism. Please do not remove it again. миражinred (speak, my child...) 22:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Eva Longoria. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Telling other users to "not" edit articles is highly inappropriate, as is continuing to rename the article after multiple editors have explained to you that your action is incorrect. Collectonian (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Alexander Boylan

A tag has been placed on Alexander Boylan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alexander Boylan

I have nominated Alexander Boylan, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Boylan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Collectonian (talk) 00:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Investigation Discovery/Discovery Times

Huh? What are you talking about? Where did I mention DT vs. ID? --Mhking (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I understand that; I'm just at a loss as to why you thought to send a note to me about it -- I haven't posted anywhere mentioning it since the changeover. --Mhking (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Lost Treasure (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lost Treasure (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Lost Treasure (film). Dchall1 (talk) 16:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with your proposed deletion because Lost Treasure is an action/adventure film. I like it so much. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lost Treasure (film)

I have nominated Lost Treasure (film), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Treasure (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dchall1 (talk) 21:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ANIMAL PLANET logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Cowboy Country

This is essentially just the same RHI Movie Weekend programming block, only Saturday nights it's now Western-themed. Clarified this edit and moved under section about RHI. Correct me if I'm wrong. -- M (speak/spoken) 01:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway, as you did to WWE Friday Night SmackDown!. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Per the talk page, the show is still called "Friday Night SmackDown!" if you disagree please discuss rather than performing the move. TrUCo9311 22:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Didn't We Almost Have It All?

Hello. There is no evidence that this article was ever deleted or listed at DRV, and I can't see any evidence in your contribution logs that you have participate in any recent DRVs that you might have intended to list. I'd like to understand your creation of this nomination. I'll be watching your page for your response. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I still await your response. I'd like to assume that this was a good faith error and not a deliberate misuse of the AfD process, but it's difficult to assume good faith if you continue actively editing, but don't reply. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia already has a Didn't We Almost Have It All? site; it doesn't need another one!! So would you please delete the other Didn't We Almost Have It All? site as soon as possible? Thank you very much. AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
No, I'm sorry, but that's not the way it works. Articles may be deleted if consensus develops that they should be, but consensus with that article (as shown in the now-closed AfD) was to keep. Furthermore, there is currently an injunction against deleting or merging some specific articles on episodes and characters, including this one, until Arbcom settles a situation, so even if consensus had been to delete, no one would be able to do so. You might wish to discuss with the other editors at Grey's Anatomy episodes (Season 3) the best way to address this duplication, possibly by cutting down the material at that page and including a pointer to the more detailed article using {{main}}. (That would look like this: {{main|Didn't We Almost Have It All?}}.) I'm going to presume that you didn't intend to mislead people about the history of that article with your AfD nomination, although I'm not sure how you managed to wind up with the specific language that you used, but I will suggest that if you want to nominate an article for deletion and aren't sure how, you might ask for assistance at the help desk. You don't want to give the impression of "abuse of tags", since this is regarded as disruption of Wikipedia. If you have any questions about any of this, please ask. I'll be happy to expand. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

SD

All we know is that SD will not be on the CW after the end of the season, there is no reliable source for when the last one will air though. Also, there is no source for what networks WWE is talking too. So stop adding unsourced info into artivles, as that violates WP:V and you can be blocked for it. TJ Spyke 00:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

MyNetworkTV

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 00:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry if you didn't know this, but you don't need to add a comma when wikilinking a date. If you wikilinkg both the day and the year (i.e. May 1 2000), the comma will automatically appear on the page, thus you don't need to add it in. TJ Spyke 01:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)


Notability of Briana Walker

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Briana Walker, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Briana Walker seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Briana Walker, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

New Line/Warners

Hi, I know you mean well, but can I suggest that you not carry on with your task of editing New Line-distributed films to read Warners? This will only hold true for films yet to be released; the distributer at the time of most of these films' release was New Line. Warners' folding of New Line into the greater whole is not a time machine with which they can alter history :) All the best, Steve T • C 23:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Indeed; it's probably safe to assume that films yet to be released will be under Warners' banner. However, Warners is still keeping New Line open for genre pics and the like, so not every future NL release can be altered. In these circumstances, it's best to wait for official confirmation in the form of a useful secondary source. All the best, Steve T • C 23:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi. For example, if you corrected a spelling mistake, noticed something wrong with the format, added a section to the article, or voiced your opinion in a discussion, please tell us in the space provided. It makes all our jobs much easier. Thank you. Grey Maiden talk 21:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

"Can't Judge a Book By Its Cover"

According to the website, the title is "Can't Judge A Book By Its Cover". More importantly, the U.S. Copyright Office lists it as "Can't judge a book by its cover". — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 20:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Source it

If you want those two episodes to stay up, tell me a website and I can help make it better.- one and only, Superior (reply!) 21:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Susan Mayer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Susan Mayer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Mayer. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ultra! 22:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

:)

Thank you -- it really helps.- Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r reply! 23:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


Please do not make unreasonable edits

Describing Remember (Desperate housewives) as two episodes is false, if it were two episodes instead of just a two hour episode there would be a part 1 & 2. Where did you get the idea that it showed up in two parts in America? I can see a previous editor has seen you do the same thing, and I also see a long record of accusing people of vandalism and threatning to get them banned, which is also not appropriate. Yojimbo501 (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you so much for considering our point of view. I'm sorry about my previous comment (I realise it was too harsh) and I hope you can forgive me. Here's to editing together in the future! Cheers! Corn.u.co.pia Discussion 13:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I'm sorry for my previous "please don't make unreasonable edits" and I see you support our side now. I still don't think it's right to tell members there banned from editing (or just editing one thing in particular), but everybody makes mistakes. Yojimbo501 (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Friday

It's "III" and not "3" because the film itself presents it as "III". The poster is the only thing that uses the numerical number over than roman numeral.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The irony is, Part 2 is the same way, but the opposite. The poster uses a roman numeral, but the film itself uses the numerical value.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Deep Space 9

It DOES air on Spike at 1am Central Tues. - Thurs. occasionally. YOU deal with it. Yaoming7511 (talk) 01:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:You are now forbidden from editing the List of Desperate Housewives episodes ever again!!!

You are forbidden from editing the List of Desperate Housewives episodes ever again!!! Do you hear me?!! FORBIDDEN!! AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

LMAO!!! Tell me something, who do you think died and made you wikiboss? Ward3001 (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:Please leave the quotes where they are, OK?

While I respect the fact you asked nicely, WP:NOT, WP:EMBED, and WP:TRIVIA dictate that "Quotes" sections are completely unnecessary and frowned upon by policy. They need to be removed. ♣ Klptyzm Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ 01:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this edit

Dude, be civil, don't bite. You don't own Wikipedia or any of its articles. If you don't like edits that other people make, explain to them why you feel they are wrong and fix the pages, don't yell at the person. And use edit summaries so everyone knows why you're doing what you're doing to articles. For example, what was the point of removing a valid link in this edit? Have a nice day! 128.253.228.176 (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Edie Britt

Oh. I am so sorry. I deleted some content by mistake. I just wanted to add the plot tag {{plot|Article|date=May 2008}}. I don't know how that happened. I would certainly not delete content like that. Friendly, Magioladitis (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


Ok, I know it sounds odd but I didn't remove paragraphs from the article. I just removed "last episode" since "it's not certain" according to the article. I reported the story in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Edie Britt is confirmed to be COMING BACK. Read: http://www.dotspotter.com/news/892879_Nicollette_Sheridan_s_Desperate_Housewives_Departure_Confirmed Deluxe (talk) 04:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The 100th episode of DH

Sorry, but this episode will be the 13th of the season 5! You are now forbidden from editing that! Get it? Don't Change THAT anymore!

Old Incivility

I have recently come across this edit you made to an IP a while back. I want to make sure you know that you know that you do not own articles. If the edits were vandalism, a simple template would have sufficed. If it was not vandalism, bringing the issue up in a civil manner would have been more appropriate. Please do not address anyone on wikipedia in that manner. Thanks. Qb | your 2 cents 16:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary -- Sixth request

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. It is considered rude not to use an edit summary. Edits without an edit summary are subject to being reverted or deleted. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Nick GAS' Recent 24/7 Schedule

Nick GAS maybe still on Dish until Jan. 2009 but the entire schedule been look the same since November 2005 when Pumping GAS, Family Double Dare & some other programs left and September 2006 when Finders Keepers left & replaced with another airing of Legends of the Hidden Temple @ 2am ET/1am CT and Figure It Out @ 5am ET/4am CT. Double Dare 2000 is sole verison of Double Dare series while Double Dare, Super Sloppy Double Dare & Family Double Dare not airing, Nickelodeon GUTS still airing on GAS, but Global GUTS hasn't aired since 11/1/05 and Nick Arcade has been aired twice in early morning hours since Late Nov. 2004 and Get the Picture have been played 4 times in afternoon since Nov. 2005. The bad news is if Get the Picture is removed from the GAS schedule, 5 shows would remain on the network (Double Dare 2000, Legends of the Hidden of Temple, Nickelodeon GUTS, Nick Arcade & Figure It Out). The good news is that GAS be expected to bring back shows who haven't played on Nick GAS in a while: Finders Keepers, Double Dare, Super Sloppy Double Dare, Family Double Dare, Wild and Crazy Kids & Global GUTS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.237.205.159 (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Why did you change "was" to "is" on the Edie Britt page?

I can reply this!! This is a change I made! Well, this is because according to WP:FICTION articles should be written in present continuous. The character always "is". Because people will still be watching DH in 5 years from now. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

US -> U.S.

I noticed you moved The Moment of Truth (US game show) to The Moment of Truth (U.S. game show) with the edit summary, "U and S have initials." That's fine, but it took me some searching to find the relevant guideline that spells this out: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (abbreviations)#Acronyms as disambiguators. When doing such a move in future, could you wikilink that MOS in the edit summary so other users can easily verify that what you're doing is correct? Thanks. --Geniac (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Episodes of DH

You don't understand that is a mistake ! Season 1 has 23, Season 2 has 24, Season 3 has 23 and Season 4 has 17 ! For the season 4, there is a two-hour season finale too ! And, it's though 2 different episodes ! So, for the season 2, it's similar ! SO, STOP EDITING !!!

Can what ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.207.180.31 (talk) 14:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

You wrote : If you can agree that the episode Remember is Part 1 (2-23) and Part 2 (2-24), so can I. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

So, You agree with me ??? O_O It's fabulous ! Thanks, you have understood ! It's great ! =) Because I hate argue with people ! Thanks you ! (86.207.180.31 (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC))

So, on the official site, on ABC, there is written "You can't judge a book by its cover" on "episodes recaps" ! So it's not "Can't judge a book by its cover" ! DOn't you think ? (14:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.207.180.31 (talk)

Excuse-me, but I would like to know, why do you change so quickly ? (86.207.180.31 (talk) 14:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC))

Adam, remember what we established? The official ABC website says that "Remember" was only one episode. I will have to change it back. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 05:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but it's not me who changes the episodes numbers ! (86.207.180.31 (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2008 (UTC))

You're sick!

I've been watching your comments on Wikipedia for quite some time now. And it's clear to me that you obviously have some kind of mental disorder. You're extremely rude to other people and seem to think that you're always right - some kind of super-human. If somebody disagrees with you, you offend and insult them and aren't able to see something from other's point of view. If someone uses an argument against your edits you don't come with an argument for your edits but just write to others to shut up like this message you have written to me:

Look, buster, get this through your head: Edie Britt is gone and she's not coming back!! OK?!! So stop editing the Edie Britt page with lies!! AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JayFS89"

I really think you should see a psychiatrist who could help you managing your disease so you could become a rational person. I also recommend you to stay away from Wikipedia untill your issues are solved. JayFS89 (talk) 22:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sick. I just misunderstood. I didn't mean to insult you with that last comment. Please accept my apologies. I take back everything I said about Edie Britt. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, thank you. I might have overreacted with that "you're sick" message but I really got annoyed at you for the reasons listed above. In the future would you please consider listening to others before you just insult them and revert their edits. Thank you (: JayFS89 (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Edie Britt

FYI, I have a source. You can say what you want, but I hope you have a fun time reverting my edits everytime. Good luck!--Whadaheck (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

After that brief stunt I pulled, I'll be very careful not to revert anymore edits. All right? AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Desperate Housewives

Hi. Sorry for keep reverting your edits. Please understand that the fact a character is a protagonist cannot rely on a short scene but for many factors. As far as I know the actor doesn't still have a contract similar to the other protagonists and there is not poster or other promomotional material to indicate that the character is a protagonist. You may be proven right but let's be patient until the next season begins. This will eliminate speculations. Remember that Wikipedia is not a crystalball. I appreciate your point of view and I think your instinct is correct but we have to be 100% sure before making this change. Friendly ans with respect to your contributions to Wikipedia, Magioladitis (talk) 22:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk:George W. Bush

You've been editing here long enough to know your posts on Talk:George W. Bush are inappropriate. Please stop trying to use Wikipedia talk pages as a forum to solicit votes for Barack Obama. - auburnpilot talk 15:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Valentine, Inc.

Please do not be insulted, but I tagged this stub as speculative. Bearian (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

TV Articles

On new page patrol, I've seen you create a few articles about upcoming television shows. You may want to consider using template:future television on these articles as I have done. —Latischolartalkcontributions 22:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saleen (Aladdin)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Saleen (Aladdin), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cirt (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with the proposed deletion of Saleen (Aladdin) because she's my favorite villain that I just love to hate. OK? So that's the reason why I am removing the deletion notice from the page. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if she's your favorite villian. It matters if the article has reliable sources that show it's notability. Schuym1 (talk) 08:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ghost Cat

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ghost Cat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Cat. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

AfD nomination of Saleen (Aladdin)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Saleen (Aladdin), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saleen (Aladdin). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Cat

Please don't post on AfD discussion that have already been closed. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 20:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


Admin Noticeboard

Since you have been spamming for two years:

Hello, AdamDeanHall. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 04:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to WWE Friday Night SmackDown!, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. D.M.N. (talk) 09:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Impact On Demand

A tag has been placed on Impact On Demand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary -- Seventh request

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. It is considered rude not to use an edit summary. Edits without an edit summary are subject to being reverted or deleted. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of When Women Rule the World

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article When Women Rule the World, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 15:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Housecat Housecall

Where did you learn that Housecat Housecall was cancelled? I read your talk page and saw you put up alot of unsourced statements and "original research" so until you link me to a reliable source I won't believe you and I'll leave the page for HH in the present tense (i.e. make it look like its on the air). Please don't put untrue, unsourced statements on my pages again. Tomcat4680 (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Those sites say nothing about it being cancelled.

There's still no proof it was cancelled. Animal Planet probably just moved it to a different time slot.

I checked the Animal Planet website for a different time slot to the show Housecat Housecall. There is no different time slot for that show. I checked twice just to make sure. Good Dog U will air Saturdays at 9AM/8AM Central and It's Me or the Dog will air Sunday mornings at 7AM/6AM Central only on Animal Planet. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

You haven't presented any solid evidence of that so I'm not going to believe you. Stop making up things. Go watch The Sci Fi channel.

You mean SCI FI, don't you? AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
ya whatever. Until the Animal Planet site explicity states "we have cancelled Housecat Housecall", I will continue to not believe you. They re-arrange the schedule all the time. Season 2 is probably in production and they haven't picked a time slot for it yet.

24/7

Not a single one of thise cites pass WP:V. Find a cite that passes WP:V.«»bd(speechify BOLO) 13:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Removing tags and templates

Please do not remove legitimate "citation needed" tags from articles, as you did here. It is considered vandalism. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

SHUT UP !!!

YOU'RE VERY SILLY TO CHANGE EPISODE NUMBERS WHENEVER !!! IT'S OUR BUSSINESS ! NOT YOURS ! GOD !!!! WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO GIVE UP THAT ??? WE'RE RIGHT ! OK ??? AND YOU ARE VERY STUPID BECAUSE SEASON 2 HAS 24 EPISODES !!! SO, THERE IS 87 REGULAR EPISODES NOT 86 !!! WHEN ARE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE WRONG !!! I'M NOT THE ONE WHO TRIES TO CHANGE THE EPISODE NUMBERS BUT I WON'T DO LIKE THEM ! OK ? YOU WANT TO PLAY ? OK ! WE'LL PLAY TOGETHER ! BUT I SWEAR YOU THAT WIKIPEDIA AND YOU, IT'S OVER ! I'LL TELL AT AN ADMINISTRATOR THAT YOU ARE SELFISH AND IT'S NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE IN DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' PAGE WITH YOU !!! IT'S OVER !!! AND ALL THE MEMBERS WHO AGREE WITH THE 24 EPISODES OF SEASON 2 WILL DO SOMETHING ! IT'S SURE !!! IT'S THE END OF YOUR DAYS ON WIKIPEDIA !!! STOP ADAM ! STOP ADAM ! STOP ADAM !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.49.9.32 (talk) 22:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not tell me to shut up. I just misunderstood about the number of episodes of Desperate Housewives. I apologize for my outburst. And please don't tell the administrator about me. OK? AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Sorry for my last message but you make me angry ! And I'm not the only one ! So, what I said it's justified beacuse you have to understand that you was selfish for a long time ! So, a lot of people was very angry against you ! I know I'm not a member of wikipedia but I must tell you what a lot of people wanted to say about the episodes numbers of wikipedia ! Now, we hope you're understand and don't remember that wikipedia is not a website which you are alone ! I don't tell anything to an administrator. Bye 81.49.9.32 (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.203.118.59 (talk)

September 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Disney XD. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Please stopping adding the Incredible Hulk to the Disney XD without also including a reference from a reputable source that this is going to be the case. The rest of the planned shows are taken from sources given in the article. KelleyCook (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Ownership

ur acting like u own the article WWE Friday Night SmackDown. You don't...try WP:OWN on for size.--72.186.90.174 (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


[3] - In future, do not change it pretending that you know it when you clearly did not. Having watched SmackDown!, I knew it wasn't "I Dare You". In my view, your actions were a violation of WP:OWN as the above IP said. D.M.N. (talk) 07:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Please ADD reliable sources to episodes of Desperate Housewives (season 5). Due to your history of reverting to unsourced info, you are in jeopardy. Please ADD reliable sources. Ay (Reply!,Contribs!) 20:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Desperate Housewives (season 5), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A talk 18:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives)

I have nominated Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. A talk 23:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC) A talk 23:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Please don't delete Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives). Please leave it alone. All right? AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Unless you find genuine sources, it fails our policy. A talk 21:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I've included the source in Mirror, Mirror (Desperate Housewives). Now will you please remove the episode from your Articles for Deletion list? Thank you very much. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
See the discussion page. A talk 21:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Which discussion page? I don't see it. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Please stop it; the article was meant for deletion, and its been decided it doesn't follow any policy. A talk 20:55, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
AdamDeanHall, please do not re-create material deleted as a result of an AfD, without properly addressing the concerns that led to its initial deletion. Most likely, it will be deleted again, and if you continue to re-create the page without a justified reason to do so, creation protection might be necessary. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
I find it hard to believe that you would delete the Desperate Housewives episode "Mirror, Mirror". This episode is on ABC this Sunday, so would you please recreate the page yourself so that I don't have to interfere? Please let me know right now. Thank you. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Just because the subject exists doesn't mean there has to be an article on it. Also, what do you mean by "interfere"? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:16, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, believe it buddy because even though it airs THIS Sunday, it fails several policies and no one vouched to save the article but you. Sorry, A talk 21:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
That depends; if, after it airs, it becomes notable add receives significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources, re-creation might be warranted. However, I'm hardly familiar with the subject at hand, so you might want to ask someone else about this episode's notability. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

On a seperate note, I find it alarming the amount of warning signs/AFD notifications/general warnings on this page. D.M.N. (talk) 21:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

What do you want me to do with the amount of warning signs/AFD notifications/general warnings on this page? AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Have you considered archiving some of them? –xeno (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Would you please show me how to archive the amount of warning signs/AFD notifications/general warnings right now? AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
See Help:Archiving a talk page. D.M.N. (talk) 19:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AdamDeanHall/Archive_1&oldid=1047059842"