User:Abd/2009 contributions/January

22:03 31-01-09 [1] User talk:Enric Naval Your comment in the RfAr on Cold fusion topic bans: long, but .... reading certainly isn't obligatory, Naval isn't being warned!
18:50 31-01-09 [2] Talk:Cold fusion Reliability of patent authorship for purposes of to-do item 1?: maybe usable in some way.
18:47 31-01-09 [3] Talk:Cold fusion Condensed Matter Physics Gets Stranger: Yes, strange. Like, uh, "cold fusion."
18:24 31-01-09 [4] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: fix some minor stuff
18:20 31-01-09 [5] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: yes, back to discussing this article, please!
16:51 31-01-09 [6] User talk:Abd Hi: sad, but not unexpected
16:42 31-01-09 [7] User talk:PHG Reconsider: or trusted by the user
16:41 31-01-09 [8] User talk:PHG Reconsider: good luck; a possible alternative.
16:18 31-01-09 [9] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Proposed decision I think I am leaving: sad. comment on the implications.
14:40 31-01-09 [10] User talk:Abd Commentary by Fritzpoll: Thanks, Dtobias
14:30 31-01-09 [11] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: fmt
14:29 31-01-09 [12] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: it's relevant here.
13:21 31-01-09 [13] User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Taking arguments back to the Dispute page: Great work, both of you.) (top) [rollback]
21:49 30-01-09 [14] User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Taking arguments back to the Dispute page: new section
21:36 30-01-09 [15] User talk:Abd reverting banned editors: did you read the evidence page, User;Abd/JzG?
21:31 30-01-09 [16] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: Agree with Roger Davies
21:00 30-01-09 [17] User talk:Abd Commentary by Fritzpoll: reply to Fritzpoll
20:57 30-01-09 [18] User talk:Abd reverting banned editors: on this.
17:30 30-01-09 [19] User talk:Abd reverting banned editors: complete this a bit.
17:29 30-01-09 [20] User talk:Abd reverting banned editors: respond to EN.
17:20 30-01-09 [21] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: ArbComm didn't rule. That means that individual arbitrator opinions, issued before evidence was in place, are dicta.
13:46 30-01-09 [22] User talk:Abd reverting banned editors: how would you suggest we resolve this dispute, Enric.
07:24 30-01-09 [23] User talk:Abd What's your read so far?: the fringe science arbitration seems to be going well, if slowly.
07:12 30-01-09 [24] User talk:Abd What's your read so far?: block of JedRothwell. My, my, it's Dead Horse Day.
06:46 30-01-09 [25] User talk:Jehochman About your comment in JzG's RfAr: Ah, darn it! You got me started.... sorry.
06:22 30-01-09 [26] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: link to JzG talk page before archiving, with discussion of this.
06:08 30-01-09 [27] User talk:Gen ato comments from banned editors: good luck.
06:00 30-01-09 [28] Talk:Cold fusion Meaningless Break: comment on Rothwell and JzG.
05:48 30-01-09 [29] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 267298977 by JzG (talk)JzG, you should not be the one to do this if it's going to be done.
04:28 30-01-09 [30] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: refer to evidence page re JzG's involvement in dispute with Rothwell and over Cold fusion in general, abuse of admin tools.
23:08 29-01-09 [31] Talk:Cold fusion Three Wikipedia's Pillars that don't seems respected at the voice "Cold fusion": with apologies to Gen ato
19:37 29-01-09 [32] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: No, not hounding. I was done. JzG, I regret any difficulties this may have or may cause you.
19:01 29-01-09 [33] User talk:Dtobias your comment at RfAr: new section
18:24 29-01-09 [34] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: Rothwell is already blocked, that's the status quo.
17:31 29-01-09 [35] Talk:Cold fusion Meaningless Break: fmt
17:30 29-01-09 [36] Talk:Cold fusion Meaningless Break: fmt
17:29 29-01-09 [37] Talk:Cold fusion Meaningless Break: very dangerous
17:12 29-01-09 [38] Talk:Cold fusion The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: Puzzled. Apparent misunderstanding.
17:04 29-01-09 [39] User talk:Enric Naval Your comment in the RfAr on Cold fusion topic bans: fix error
17:02 29-01-09 [40] User talk:Enric Naval Your comment in the RfAr on Cold fusion topic bans: new section
16:31 29-01-09 [41] User talk:Jehochman About your comment in JzG's RfAr: new section
16:11 29-01-09 [42] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: about the SPA charges. Remove redundant comments from introduction.
15:30 29-01-09 [43] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: Rothwell did not publish Pcarbonn's article.
15:26 29-01-09 [44] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: respond to suggestion of "apply the topic ban."
15:06 29-01-09 [45] Talk:Cold fusion Meaningless Break: JzG escalated to ArbComm, not clear why. There wasn't an AN report, wasn't anything but a request to unblock.
14:20 29-01-09 [46] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Jehochman: Statement by User:Abd
13:44 29-01-09 [47] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: tad premature?
13:40 29-01-09 [48] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: Just to note that Guy's !vote is redundant.
13:38 29-01-09 [49] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: add Merge option
13:34 29-01-09 [50] Talk:Cold fusion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: the implications of the AfD here.
13:21 29-01-09 [51] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of CR-39 image: image captions don't have to be sentences.
13:08 29-01-09 [52] Talk:Cold fusion The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: image easy to replace, but what we need is more difficult: better cooperation
02:45 29-01-09 [53] User talk:GoRight Argument with JzG: new section
02:15 29-01-09 [54] User talk:Abd Interesting secondary sources: pyroelectric fusion is hot fusion. Very hot. Very small.
00:37 29-01-09 [55] Talk:Cold fusion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: my, my, my.
00:03 29-01-09 [56] User talk:Abd Interesting secondary sources: Oxford University Press.
23:40 28-01-09 [57] User talk:Abd Interesting secondary sources: about the sources. Thanks for looking. Let me know what you find.
22:37 28-01-09 [58] Talk:Cold fusion Improving the outline: There are really two different subjects, one is about history, the other about current science.
22:25 28-01-09 [59] Talk:Cold fusion The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: added section on CR-39 image
22:22 28-01-09 [60] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of CR-39 image: new section
21:43 28-01-09 [61] Talk:Cold fusion The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: rubbing salt in his wounds?
16:53 28-01-09 [62] Talk:Cold fusion The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: The V word is unnecessary. Be nice.
16:46 28-01-09 [63] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: sign it!
16:45 28-01-09 [64] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: respond to Phil153: yes, the decision should be made by editors at Cold fusion.
16:39 28-01-09 [65] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: respond to Enric Naval
16:32 28-01-09 [66] Talk:Cold fusion The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: new section
15:44 28-01-09 [67] User talk:Abd Arguing with JzG: more reply to Dan
14:52 28-01-09 [68] Cold fusion return inage of CR-39 with faint smell of weasel cleaned out.
14:45 28-01-09 [69] User talk:Noren CF Images and Copyright: no problem.
14:12 28-01-09 [70] Talk:Cold fusion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: new section
14:01 28-01-09 [71] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: Keep
13:52 28-01-09 [72] User talk:Aitias/archive 3 Your deletion of Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: Thanks.
13:48 28-01-09 [73] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: An expert (fringe or not) on the topic makes many posts to Talk and signs with his title? This is not linkspam, but it's also not relevant.
05:03 28-01-09 [74] User talk:Noren CF Images and Copyright: can the grant of copyright made with upload be revoked?
04:50 28-01-09 [75] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: add Physchim62 arbitration.
04:42 28-01-09 [76] User talk:Abd Topic Ban: I'm working on it, Phil.
04:27 28-01-09 [77] User talk:Abd Arguing with JzG: fmt
04:27 28-01-09 [78] User talk:Abd Arguing with JzG: don't understand the reference to BADSITES
04:22 28-01-09 [79] User talk:Abd Arguing with JzG: not arguing: making a due process request, hopefully adequately expressed. It's his choice how to respond.
04:10 28-01-09 [80] User talk:Abd Pseudoscience, Fringe science, or Questionable science: what do readers expect to find?
03:55 28-01-09 [81] User talk:Abd Pseudoscience, Fringe science, or Questionable science: I have no magic solution.
01:17 28-01-09 [82] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: I think you blocked the wrong IP in December. Not Rothwell.
01:01 28-01-09 [83] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Arguments of Rtol: remove the signature; does everyone agree that these are arguments of Rtol?) (top) [rollback]
01:00 28-01-09 [84] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Arguments of Skipsievert: move discussion to Talk. Thanks for starting, Skip.
00:57 28-01-09 [85] User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics move Skip Sievert discussion from Dispute page; summary listing arguments should be taken back.
00:46 28-01-09 [86] User talk:Fritzpoll are you allowed to delete people's comments to avoid responding to criticism?: Flagged Revisions? that's important!
00:42 28-01-09 [87] User talk:Gen ato Inserting Material into Cold Fusion: about the questions and censorship
00:39 28-01-09 [88] User talk:Gen ato Inserting Material into Cold Fusion: Welcome, sorry it might seem unfriendly. Back up, read the history, become familiar; it will make more sense.
00:28 28-01-09 [89] Talk:Cold fusion copy of edit by Gen ato: Welcome, Gen ato. Yes, there may be some improvements needed. Discuss. Be patient.
00:10 28-01-09 [90] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: add not about IP editor's immediate self-reversion
00:07 28-01-09 [91] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: well, no diffs, but a list of IP contribution pages.
23:23 27-01-09 [92] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: don't say I didn't ask.
19:45 27-01-09 [93] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 266767212 by Enric Naval (talk)do not remove Talk comments that have been responded to.
19:41 27-01-09 [94] User talk:JzG Your block of 208.89.102.50: new section
19:33 27-01-09 [95] Talk:Cold fusion Meaningless Break: Topic ban on one person applied to another with no evidence of meat puppetry? Novel, for sure.
19:22 27-01-09 [96] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: wording
16:30 27-01-09 [97] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: please approve or deny this whitelist request, it's been more than a week.
18:19 26-01-09 [98] User talk:Abd Pseudoscience, Fringe science, or Questionable science: respond to GoRight
15:40 26-01-09 [99] User talk:Abd Topic Ban: I understand.
15:25 26-01-09 [100] Talk:Cold fusion copy of edit by Gen ato: Arata not some backyard bozo.
15:22 26-01-09 [101] Talk:Cold fusion copy of edit by Gen ato: respond to JzG.
15:08 26-01-09 [102] Talk:Cold fusion arbitrary section break: good demonstration of why we don't do synthesis
14:49 26-01-09 [103] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics explain better, hopefully
14:45 26-01-09 [104] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Arguments of Firebladed: move discussion to Talk, solicit summary to come back here.
14:42 26-01-09 [105] User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics moved from Disputes page as being of the nature of a discussion.
14:28 26-01-09 [106] User talk:Abd Did you post to my page as an IP: Yes, I did. Damn autologout! Something isn't working right. Anyway, thanks Fritzpoll. (removing, not needed here.)
14:25 26-01-09 [107] User talk:Fritzpoll are you allowed to delete people's comments to avoid responding to criticism?: Yes, it was me.
06:04 26-01-09 [108] Cold fusion Undid revision 265762555 by StevenBKrivit (talk)Hmmph! I think it looks nice.
05:53 26-01-09 [109] Talk:Cold fusion Revert by TS of substantial new material in lead: I agree with the reversion.
05:42 26-01-09 [110] Talk:Cold fusion Meaningless Break: don't harass the poor Guy!
05:34 26-01-09 [111] Talk:Cold fusion arbitrary section break: denying massive program and encouraging research under existing programs are not an error.
02:49 26-01-09 [112] User talk:Aether22 Male Urination: BTW, take that IP out of your signature!
02:47 26-01-09 [113] User talk:Aether22 My comment: good move, Aether22.
02:38 26-01-09 [114] User talk:Aether22 Male Urination: I agree.
02:35 26-01-09 [115] User talk:Rtol January 2009: Thanks, Richard.
02:30 26-01-09 [116] User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Please don't sign comments or write in the first or second person on the user page, except for "we" referring to what "we" should do, for example, under arguments.
02:28 26-01-09 [117] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Arguments of Rtol: This is an NPOV consensus page. Put in third person; here, it is under Tol's arguments, so it refers to what he thinks we should do. Don't sign contributions here.
02:18 26-01-09 [118] Talk:Cold fusion Topic ban reminding: Ah, leave it to Rothwell. He hasn't been banned, but it could be arranged.
02:03 26-01-09 [119] Talk:Cold fusion Topic ban reminding: Right, Enric. Be my guest. Let me know if I'm mentioned so I can hide under a rock. Or not.
01:58 26-01-09 [120] User talk:Abd Hi: Right, Coppertwig
01:21 26-01-09 [121] User talk:Noren CF Images and Copyright: about the image that *was* deleted.
00:52 26-01-09 [122] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: respond to Tony. More tea?
23:42 25-01-09 [123] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: Okay, you've got my interest!
23:34 25-01-09 [124] Talk:Cold fusion Topic ban reminding: detailed response to claims of a ban.
22:51 25-01-09 [125] User talk:Abd Hi: obsessively correct date stamp (signed late)
22:49 25-01-09 [126] User talk:Abd Hi: sign it.
22:46 25-01-09 [127] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: Welcome to my Talk, Tony.
20:50 25-01-09 [128] User talk:Abd Hi: look at the results. You lost a little, but you also gained quite a bit. Watch.
20:28 25-01-09 [129] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics What text relating to Thermoeconomics is appropriate in Energy economics?: fmt
20:27 25-01-09 [130] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics What text relating to Thermoeconomics is appropriate in Energy economics: question mark
20:27 25-01-09 [131] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics Instructions on the use of this page by Abd: set the tone!
20:26 25-01-09 [132] User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics start page for dispute description
20:07 25-01-09 [133] Talk:Energy economics Proposed additions to the article on related fields: how to approach the stronger disagreements
19:53 25-01-09 [134] Talk:Energy economics Proposed additions to the article on related fields: thanks for pursuing consensus
15:12 25-01-09 [135] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: a witch hunt is to be rigorously avoided.
01:40 25-01-09 [136] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: fmt
01:35 25-01-09 [137] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: okay, what's wrong with the Pcarbonn ban? The basis is astonishingly unclear, I've seen little worse from ArbComm.
17:16 24-01-09 [138] Talk:Energy economics Proposed additions to the article on related fields: Good, Skip; Rtol, what could you accept?
17:11 24-01-09 [139] Talk:Energy economics Proposed additions to the article on related fields: format as new section. turn over a new leaf.
17:05 24-01-09 [140] User talk:Abd cold fusion report recommendation: please remember to assume good faith. I have requested undeletion from the closing admin.
17:01 24-01-09 [141] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop General discussion: this may not be the right format, please correct if appropriate
17:00 24-01-09 [142] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop Comment by Abd
16:58 24-01-09 [143] User talk:Aitias/archive 3 Your deletion of Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: new section
16:50 24-01-09 [144] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: Yes, there was. I linked to it!
14:13 24-01-09 [145] User talk:Abd Standing Offer/Request: Thanks, GoRight.
14:05 24-01-09 [146] User talk:Abd Question: Excellent that you sought help.
13:52 24-01-09 [147] User talk:Jehochman Question: About Rtol and dangers involved in judging edit warring.
13:27 24-01-09 [148] User talk:Jehochman Question: I'm on it, Jehochman.
12:50 24-01-09 [149] User talk:Rtol January 2009: new section
12:41 24-01-09 [150] Talk:Energy economics Edit warring on this article, please stop. This is a friendly warning.: Good, Skip.Thanks for backing down.
01:07 24-01-09 [151] Talk:Energy economics what belongs: Slow down. Discuss, don't continue reverting. Ask for help and independent comment. Both of you have done that, which is why I'm here.
00:59 24-01-09 [152] Talk:Energy economics Edit warring on this article, please stop. This is a friendly warning.: new section
00:44 24-01-09 [153] Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests energy economics: I'm investigating the situation and expect to advise the involved editors.
00:29 24-01-09 [154] User talk:Abd Question: okay, I'll look at it.
21:20 23-01-09 [155] Talk:Cold fusion Topic ban reminding: Rothwell not banned. Irritating, perhaps, but not banned.
19:56 23-01-09 [156] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: add a word to emphasize credibility, which the weight of the evidence elsewhere shows
19:46 23-01-09 [157] User talk:JzG Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: Of course I'll watch the article as I can. Let me know if I miss something.
19:41 22-01-09 [158] User talk:Abd Your request: thanks, Sarcasticidealist
19:36 22-01-09 [159] User talk:Sarcasticidealist Request for copy of deleted page.: damn autologout! sign it!
19:24 22-01-09 [160] User talk:Phil153 A response to the messages you archived: my condolences, Phil
19:04 22-01-09 [161] User talk:JzG Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: thanks for recusing yourself.
16:53 22-01-09 [162] User talk:JzG Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: Thanks, JzG
15:54 22-01-09 [163] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Balance, Shanahan, as a published author on this, deserves respect.
04:55 22-01-09 [164] User talk:JzG Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: correct. Not COI, but "involved"
04:43 22-01-09 [165] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: it's not actually linkspam.
04:20 22-01-09 [166] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: I'd say it isn't spam. Yet these posts were the weak evidence cited in the blacklisting.
20:22 21-01-09 [167] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: fmt
20:21 21-01-09 [168] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Please be more helpful, Rothwell, and less confrontive. It might look like it to you, but this isn't a battle with sides.
18:39 21-01-09 [169] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: be careful, Kirk.
18:16 21-01-09 [170] Talk:Cold fusion reply to first KS comment
17:49 21-01-09 [171] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: move Shanahan comment do re-unite my own.
17:45 21-01-09 [172] MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist lenr-canr.org: no credible allegation of copyright violation. Unreliability is a complex editorial judgment which should be made by editors of involved articles.
16:39 21-01-09 [173] User talk:Pavlov2009 no conflict with privacy policy
16:27 21-01-09 [174] Talk:Urination Semiprotected: Aether22 blocked for two weeks now.
16:25 21-01-09 [175] Talk:Urination Semiprotected: sad case
16:18 21-01-09 [176] User talk:Aether22 IP not blocked: successful IP edit shortly before the "will this possibly work" edit.
16:13 21-01-09 [177] User talk:Aether22 IP not blocked: wikilawyering: Wikipedia isn't a court and rule of law (as we ordinarily think of it) doesn't apply here. Raising technicalities falls on its face.
15:56 21-01-09 [178] User talk:Aether22 Please copy to Urination Talk: arrgh. I tried, and, I suppose, this is one last try.
15:22 21-01-09 [179] User talk:JzG Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: "fringe" isn't really a cause to delete an article Talk page: what was the necessity?
14:42 21-01-09 [180] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Calorimetry subarticle userfied. Kirk, your help is greatly appreciated.
04:07 21-01-09 [181] User talk:Abd Your request: no harm in asking.
03:57 21-01-09 [182] User talk:Phil153 Where is this going?: reply to Rothwell
02:56 21-01-09 [183] Talk:Cold fusion The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Shanahan's explanation is background.
02:43 21-01-09 [184] User talk:Abd FYI: Removing sourced material: I didn't quote ArbComm. Here, in fact, you did.
23:41 20-01-09 [185] User talk:Sarcasticidealist Request for copy of deleted page.: request another.
23:26 20-01-09 [186] User talk:Abd FYI: Removing sourced material: Your point, Phil?
23:24 20-01-09 [187] User talk:Abd FYI: Removing sourced material: Allegations. We should base article balance on them?
19:14 20-01-09 [188] User talk:Phil153 My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: responses to Phil, but mostly to Jed Rothwell.
15:39 20-01-09 [189] User talk:Aether22 Jimmy Wales vision: assume good faith.
15:24 20-01-09 [190] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelist: the link was helpful, Rothwell, the rest wasn't.
15:22 20-01-09 [191] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelist: about the blacklisting, and a whitelist proposal.
15:18 20-01-09 [192] User talk:Abd/IP Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: respond to Rothwell.
14:55 20-01-09 [193] User talk:Abd cold fusion report recommendation: about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments
14:39 20-01-09 [194] User talk:Abd FYI: Removing sourced material: about Robert M. Carter
14:23 20-01-09 [195] User talk:Abd FYI: Removing sourced material: thanks, Phil153.
14:21 20-01-09 [196] User talk:Abd FYI: Removing sourced material: thanks, GoRight.
21:32 19-01-09 [197] User talk:Phil153 My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: Phil, you lost me with "wanker." This is the thinking behind your editing?
20:56 19-01-09 [198] User talk:Abd Your request
20:20 19-01-09 [199] User talk:Sarcasticidealist Request for copy of deleted page.: new section
19:13 19-01-09 [200] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: summary: there was no linkspamming; there was usage by legitimate editors; therefore blacklisting was an error.
19:11 19-01-09 [201] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: summary.
05:17 19-01-09 [202] Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: if implemented in a stupid way, it would be stupid.
05:12 19-01-09 [203] Talk:Cold fusion Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: Jed has answered the question: he has permission for what he hosts.
05:02 19-01-09 [204] Talk:Cold fusion/Archive 19 Undid revision 264690813 by Verbal (talk)this discussion went back to Talk.
05:01 19-01-09 [205] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 264712636 by Noren (talk)moved back to Talk
05:01 19-01-09 [206] Talk:Cold fusion/Archive 19 Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: move Noren comment from archive to here.
04:55 19-01-09 [207] Talk:Cold fusion Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: It was Verbal
04:38 19-01-09 [208] User talk:Phil153 CF discussion: asking about your skepticism, Phil. Really, can you point me to some cogent and recent criticism?
04:13 19-01-09 [209] User talk:Phil153 My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: Rothwell asserts both publisher and author permissions.
04:04 19-01-09 [210] User talk:Phil153 My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: format and minor error
04:01 19-01-09 [211] User talk:Phil153 My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: abuse of the blacklist.
03:44 19-01-09 [212] Talk:Cold fusion Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: not off topic.
03:22 19-01-09 [213] Talk:Cold fusion Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: Jed, please use your registered account.
03:05 19-01-09 [214] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 264690626 by Verbal (talk)This is an important discussion. I'm pulling it all in, may put a collapse box on it.
03:00 19-01-09 [215] Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: reverting is editing, not sighting.
02:56 19-01-09 [216] User talk:LeadSongDog whitelisting of lenr-canr.org bibliography.: No evidence that the bibliography is biased. Rothwell has for a long time invited critical papers.
02:45 19-01-09 [217] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: about NET and the RSN discussion, very old edits, and the absence of linkspamming
01:54 19-01-09 [218] Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: worried? so don't do it!
19:49 18-01-09 [219] User talk:Aether22 Jimmy Wales vision: not useful, Aether22
19:39 18-01-09 [220] User talk:Aether22 Blocked for 1 week: basic mistake: attachment to being right. Even if you are right! Attachment clouds your judgment.
17:21 18-01-09 [221] Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: new section
16:26 18-01-09 [222] Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions/Trial/Votes Supports 301-400: support. essential for scale and reliability, maintains freedom but channels it.
22:45 17-01-09 [223] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: no adequate reason for blacklisting has been given, only arguments over matters which should be left to editorial consensus in articles.
19:17 16-01-09 [224] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: on work on CR-39
18:34 16-01-09 [225] User talk:Aether22 Blocked for 1 week: The IP edits wouldn't be a basis for the block.
18:13 16-01-09 [226] User talk:Aether22 Blocked for 1 week: well, I tried.
18:00 16-01-09 [227] User talk:LeadSongDog ultimately scorn: there was and is scorn and derision. "Ultimately" is definitely wrong. The jury is out.
17:55 16-01-09 [228] User talk:LeadSongDog whitelisting of lenr-canr.org bibliography.: and evidence of selection bias in the bibliography?
17:34 16-01-09 [229] User talk:Abd cold fusion report recommendation: Of course. We could point to the recent research, if we could agree on it and how to frame it. But I'm not proposing that yet.
02:58 16-01-09 [230] User talk:LeadSongDog whitelisting of lenr-canr.org bibliography.: new section
02:55 16-01-09 [231] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: "fringe" is irrelevant to blacklisting. The decision as to whether or not a source is usable is an editorial decision, not generallhy an admin one.
02:16 16-01-09 [232] User talk:JzG Confused??: thanks anyway.
02:02 16-01-09 [233] User talk:Aether22 Blocked for 1 week: okay, advice.
01:26 16-01-09 [234] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: the quoted material is from about a page before the quoted "conclusions," in the "summary."
01:12 16-01-09 [235] User talk:Abd Confused: here we are in the real world of Wikipedia, some sort of hybrid of dream, fantasy, and nightmare. And an encyclopedia.
00:52 16-01-09 [236] User talk:Abd Aether22 block: respond to Tryptofish.
17:54 15-01-09 [237] User talk:GoRight Thanks and warning: be nice, don't take any wooden nickels.
17:43 15-01-09 [238] User talk:JzG Confused??: Aether22 was blocked.
17:29 15-01-09 [239] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: fix link
17:27 15-01-09 [240] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: Noren reverted.... sigh.
17:21 15-01-09 [241] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: not cherry picked.
16:57 15-01-09 [242] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell: pay attention, folks, the air is full of smoke and some mirrors, hosts of irrelevant and inaccurate arguments about this.
16:35 15-01-09 [243] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell: This really has nothing to do with Jed Rothwell, it's about Wikipedia guidelines.
16:13 15-01-09 [244] Talk:Urination Appropriateness of photo: Aether22 blocked for a week.
16:05 15-01-09 [245] User talk:Aether22 Blocked for 1 week: strike prior response, I did more research. slow down, Aether. One step at a time.
15:28 15-01-09 [246] User talk:Aether22 Blocked for 1 week: that's excessive for a naive editor who hasn't been warned about the alleged misbehavior.
15:21 15-01-09 [247] User talk:JzG Confused??: here's the explanation, Aether22.
04:46 15-01-09 [248] User talk:Aether22 General note: Refactoring others' talk page comments on User talk:JzG. (TW)
04:41 15-01-09 [249] User talk:JzG Undid revision 264179238 by Aether22 (talk)
04:40 15-01-09 [250] User talk:JzG Undid revision 264179577 by Aether22 (talk)user revised content not his contribution
04:39 15-01-09 [251] User talk:JzG undo Durova edit temporarily to rollback improper restoration of content that had been archived by JzG
23:51 13-01-09 [252] Cold fusion Further developments: try again with modification based on Talk.
23:36 13-01-09 [253] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: my history with this topic.
19:39 13-01-09 [254] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: about NPOV and sourcing.
15:37 13-01-09 [255] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: respond to Phil
15:26 13-01-09 [256] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: about admin abuse and our need for community.
15:14 13-01-09 [257] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: on Mr. Krivit's comment.
08:03 13-01-09 [258] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard GoRight community discussion (cont'd): about that supposedly most-supported comment in the GoRight RfC....
07:30 13-01-09 [259] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard GoRight community discussion (cont'd): respond to Raul654
06:45 13-01-09 [260] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard GoRight community discussion (cont'd): GoRight, as the Family Dog said, may the baby Jesus shut your mouth and open your mind.
06:13 13-01-09 [261] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: about the 1989 report and balance and some dicta
04:59 13-01-09 [262] User talk:Durova Response: now that we've finished that, about JzG.... can you advise or mediate?
04:13 13-01-09 [263] User talk:Abd lenr-canr.org: the plot thickens, Petri and Dtobias
03:33 13-01-09 [264] User talk:DGG Advice requested re the spam blacklist: thanks again, DGG.
03:22 13-01-09 [265] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: point to specific page for quote
23:42 12-01-09 [266] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org: add link to related request.
23:37 12-01-09 [267] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: Thanks for asking, Durova.
23:14 12-01-09 [268] User talk:Durova Response: whose blood? Will mine do?
20:07 12-01-09 [269] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop PHG improved sourcing methods: add point about error rate.
20:05 12-01-09 [270] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop PHG improved sourcing methods: the source substantiates what was said here, and that isn't contradicted by other facts in the source.
19:54 12-01-09 [271] User talk:Durova Response: be nice, kids!
19:44 12-01-09 [272] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: It's not, actually a true "fringe" field. It's a minority field, largely rejected, but still open for research.
19:26 12-01-09 [273] User talk:JzG lenr-canr.org: briefly, was your addition to the blacklist a legitimate use of your admin tools?
19:16 12-01-09 [274] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: the history of the blacklisting and what edits preceded it.
19:03 12-01-09 [275] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: explain how the blacklisting took place.
18:38 12-01-09 [276] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org (original thread): add note re fixing link.
18:36 12-01-09 [277] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org (original thread): fix link, subject changed.
18:07 12-01-09 [278] User talk:Petri Krohn Notable Gaels: comment on lists.
18:04 12-01-09 [279] User talk:Petri Krohn belated condolences and welcome back.: new section
16:42 12-01-09 [280] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop PHG improved sourcing methods: respond to Latebird and to Septentrionalis
16:25 12-01-09 [281] Talk:Cold fusion Balance in the 2004 DOE report: new section
15:44 12-01-09 [282] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell: format link: JzG, why no user page?
15:42 12-01-09 [283] Talk:Cold fusion Jed Rothwell: on Jed Rothwell, IP contributions, and spin.
14:50 12-01-09 [284] User talk:Abd cold fusion report recommendation: format
14:49 12-01-09 [285] User talk:Abd cold fusion report recommendation: thanks for your note, Enric. *The controversy is open,* that is obvious from recent sources.
02:02 12-01-09 [286] Instant-runoff voting Changes for voters: remove space
02:01 12-01-09 [287] Instant-runoff voting Is IRV better than other winner-take-all systems?: moved back to lead
02:00 12-01-09 [288] Instant-runoff voting it was a settled consensus that this belonged in the lead (debated extensively). It's wordy, but it definitely didn't belong in the section where it was moved.
01:53 12-01-09 [289] Instant-runoff voting IRV will eliminate some of the spoiler effect: restore this, it was improperly removed in December.
01:43 12-01-09 [290] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Evidence Evidence deadline: is this about winning arguments or about seeking and finding consensus?
01:32 12-01-09 [291] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop PHG is encouraged to keep working with his mentor: Support, but ....
01:29 12-01-09 [292] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop PHG makes high quality contributions: he's asking for praise and he deserves it. Why not give it to him?
01:27 12-01-09 [293] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop Mentor invitation: support
01:19 12-01-09 [294] User talk:Abd/IP add messages below this section header: reply to Fredrick day
01:09 12-01-09 [295] User talk:DGG Advice requested re the spam blacklist: developments
00:46 12-01-09 [296] User talk:Abd lenr-canr.org: LENR learner.
00:42 12-01-09 [297] User talk:Abd Hi Abd!: good to stay out of it. Let others work it out. What, me worry?
00:18 12-01-09 [298] Cold fusion Further developments: add conclusion of the 2004 DOE report re further research.
23:48 11-01-09 [299] User talk:Abd Hi abd!: ugh, saw AN today.
23:30 11-01-09 [300] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard GoRight community ban: arggh.
21:59 11-01-09 [301] User talk:Abd Account Creation Tool Confirmation: is there a record of the IP from which the request was made?
20:44 11-01-09 [302] User talk:Abd Hi abd!: thanks.
17:44 11-01-09 [303] User talk:JzG lenr-canr.org: thanks.
17:32 11-01-09 [304] User talk:Abd Account Creation Tool Confirmation: it wasn't me, I believe.
17:31 11-01-09 [305] User:Abd/PHG arbitration ArbComm erred in the original arbitration) (top) [rollback]
18:18 10-01-09 [306] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org: add note to closed discussion
18:15 10-01-09 [307] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org: JzG's response doesn't seem to show a reading of the letter from the webmaster.
17:58 10-01-09 [308] User talk:JzG Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: We can pursue whitelisting, sure, and we will, I'm sure, if the improper blacklisting isn't lifted. But why make it hard? What's the harm?
17:39 10-01-09 [309] User talk:JzG JzG's multiple roles: more accurate, diff'd
17:34 10-01-09 [310] User talk:JzG Again on Cold Fusion: enough?
17:07 10-01-09 [311] User talk:DGG Advice requested re the spam blacklist: thanks, I'll see what's been up.
18:06 08-01-09 [312] User talk:DGG Advice requested re the spam blacklist: new section
17:46 08-01-09 [313] User talk:JzG Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: the blacklist is not for possibly useful sites, but for clearly inappropriate ones. lenr-canr, on the face, is useful.
17:35 08-01-09 [314] User talk:JzG Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: bottom line, Guy, you have a POV and enforced it with your tools. Please undo it.
17:26 08-01-09 [315] User talk:JzG JzG's multiple roles: apparently you wish to continue to discuss this directly. Fine. I suppose it might work.
05:07 08-01-09 [316] User talk:JzG Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: please make this objection moot.
04:46 08-01-09 [317] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org: I, too, wish JzG would recognize the COI involved in his use of his admin tools to enforce his own opinion.
04:23 08-01-09 [318] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Evidence Request for evidence, if it exists: some comments
01:02 07-01-09 [319] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org: objection to listing.
00:51 07-01-09 [320] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org: sp
00:50 07-01-09 [321] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lenr-canr.org
00:35 07-01-09 [322] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: maybe something relevant to the Fringe science arbitration.
00:33 07-01-09 [323] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: can of worms, Jehochman. Maybe I should take your Talk page off my Watchlist.....
23:57 06-01-09 [324] User talk:JzG Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: are we done? would you consent to another administrator's removal of the listing?
23:46 06-01-09 [325] Talk:Martin Fleischmann restoring description of experiment to article: fmt
23:44 06-01-09 [326] Talk:Martin Fleischmann restoring description of experiment to article: thanks for replying, JzG. Please delist as the listing was improper.
19:47 06-01-09 [327] User talk:JzG Again on Cold Fusion: requested removal of lenr-canr from blacklist
19:44 06-01-09 [328] User talk:JzG Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: date fix
19:43 06-01-09 [329] User talk:JzG Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: new section
19:34 06-01-09 [330] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: some more
19:19 06-01-09 [331] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: sign
19:13 06-01-09 [332] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: There is indeed a problem here, Jehochman. Don't know if you want to get involved, but ....
18:48 06-01-09 [333] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Fleischmann-Pons experiment: restoring experiment description to article
18:08 06-01-09 [334] Martin Fleischmann Fleischmann-Pons experiment: cut back on section, details are in main article. Could be cut further.
15:21 06-01-09 [335] Martin Fleischmann Fleischmann-Pons experiment: I don't see discussion on Talk.
15:20 06-01-09 [336] Martin Fleischmann Undid revision 259755962 by Cardamon (talk)this experiment was very important; remedy at this point is not to remove.
15:09 06-01-09 [337] User talk:JzG Again on Cold Fusion: comment on spam filter.
14:58 06-01-09 [338] User talk:Jehochman Misuse of spam filter to enforce POV: one step at a time
13:52 05-01-09 [339] User:Abd/PHG arbitration create
16:51 04-01-09 [340] User talk:PHG Your Arbcomm proceeding, a suggestion. Stop defending yourself, entirely. Let others do it, or not.: new section
15:26 04-01-09 [341] User talk:Gwen Gale Speedy deletion of Anthony Chinn: Good work,
03:36 03-01-09 [342] Anthony Chinn I'd say, leave the stub alone, appears notable.
03:23 03-01-09 [343] User talk:Hemanshu Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Hemanshu: It was, indeed, edit warring, quite plainly; "goals" can't be enforced without an enforcer. Who interprets the goals?
02:51 02-01-09 [344] Rod Serling Reverted to revision 261198701 by 151.198.128.88; unreferenced claim, found no verification. (TW)
02:35 02-01-09 [345] User talk:Hemanshu Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Hemanshu: It's not 2004 any more. Wikipedia grew.
21:32 01-01-09 [346] Talk:Voting system Comment about Bucklin removed from article.: new section)