User:Abd/2009 contributions/April

18:19 30-04-09 [1] Talk:Cold fusion Another fine source: mention the links at the bottom of the PRI article: newenergytimes.com and lenr-canr.org.
18:14 30-04-09 [2] Talk:Cold fusion Another fine source: excellent find, LSD.
17:55 30-04-09 [3] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Park book: diamonds may be forever, but not the authority of sources if the subject has advanced. Sources review what was available, and sometimes not even all that.
11:03 30-04-09 [4] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence normally requires at least two editors to blacklist: extended consideration of this.
01:50 30-04-09 [5] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Park book: extend
01:44 30-04-09 [6] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Park book: fmt
01:42 30-04-09 [7] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of Park book: Park isn't needed for what is there. But, hey, suit yourself.
01:00 30-04-09 [8] Talk:Cold fusion Confirmation?: yes, the SPAWAR results confirm earlier findings.
20:31 29-04-09 [9] Talk:Cold fusion Relation to theory: comment on theory.
18:35 29-04-09 [10] Rashad Khalifa source is given. source has not been impeached. Source is Tucson citizen, not convenience copy shown. Want to be useful? Find the disposition of the case.
17:05 29-04-09 [11] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Viridae instructed: extra words out!
17:04 29-04-09 [12] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Viridae instructed: reject utterly.
16:59 29-04-09 [13] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Viridae never meant his pledge: respond to disruptive wikilawyering over what would be *at worst* minor failure to recuse.
16:36 29-04-09 [14] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Viridae deblacklisted newenergytimes: clarify fact
16:29 29-04-09 [15] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG blacklisted newenergytimes: sign
16:28 29-04-09 [16] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG blacklisted newenergytimes: correct misapprehension that appears common.
16:24 29-04-09 [17] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold Fusion: Clerks, please reserve comment section for parties to comments by parties; respond to MastCell.
16:14 29-04-09 [18] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Request to narrow initial focus: request clerk to close and collapse request as having failed for lack of a second.
04:57 29-04-09 [19] Talk:Cold fusion Neutron radiation: new section
04:53 29-04-09 [20] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: clarify a little
04:38 29-04-09 [21] Cold fusion Neutron radiation: period
04:37 29-04-09 [22] Cold fusion Neutron radiation: "the main" was quoted from Storms, actually, but this is more neutral. Then connect with MB's report, clearly well above background) See Talk.
04:34 29-04-09 [23] Cold fusion Neutron radiation: no implication was made re mainstream view, though I'm not sure who Main Stream is and if we can quote him. But try this.
04:02 29-04-09 [24] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Request to narrow initial focus: sigh. I tried.
03:23 29-04-09 [25] Cold fusion Neutron radiation: The Mosier-Boss findings confirmed earlier work, some of which is cited in the Mosier-Boss paper, plus other sources.
03:11 29-04-09 [26] Cold fusion Bibliography: Add Hoffman (1995)
02:37 29-04-09 [27] Cold fusion Undid revision 286627664 by Abd (talk)2009 was correct for print publication. 2008 was on-line pub.
00:12 29-04-09 [28] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Verifying link addition statements: that was a radical misunderstanding.
23:53 28-04-09 [29] Talk:Cold fusion Revert over alleged copyvio: about the abstract. Seeing an abstract is greatly inferior to seeing a paper.
23:49 28-04-09 [30] Talk:Cold fusion Revert over alleged copyvio: I'm backing off from asserting the link, it may indeed be a problem.
21:43 28-04-09 [31] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold Fusion: Unless Hersfold and MastCell would like to become parties to this arbitration, I think this belongs here. Please revert me if I'm wrong.
19:13 28-04-09 [32] Talk:Cold fusion Revert over alleged copyvio: thanks for clarifying. This is the same issue as was raised with lenr-canr.org.
17:42 28-04-09 [33] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold Fusion: Unfortunately, the evidence shows a likelihood of recurrence, not with Cold fusion, but with some new involvement.
17:09 28-04-09 [34] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist: sign
17:08 28-04-09 [35] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist: This issue wasn't ripe for ArbComm, I suggest this case only establish some basic limits.
16:42 28-04-09 [36] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: copy edt
16:39 28-04-09 [37] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: fmt
14:53 28-04-09 [38] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Tools exist to sanction behavior, not content: this has been discussed at great length. we have ideas about better process.
11:29 28-04-09 [39] Cold fusion Bibliography: fix year.
11:26 28-04-09 [40] Talk:Cold fusion Revert over alleged copyvio: new section
11:16 28-04-09 [41] User talk:Abd University of Atlanta: put it here
11:15 28-04-09 [42] User talk:Abd Groundrules and accepted background: move comment
04:26 28-04-09 [43] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Fresh block, during Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: make it clear
04:18 28-04-09 [44] Cold fusion Lack of neutron radiation: arrgh. fix ref
04:17 28-04-09 [45] Cold fusion Lack of neutron radiation: who's been writing this article, anyway. Add proper reference to Mosier Boss. Accepted as plausible? By whom? Remove dubious Park reference, redundant triple-miracle comment.
03:59 28-04-09 [46] Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: remove material not substantiated in source, or entire book used without page nos.
03:58 28-04-09 [47] Cold fusion Bibliography: add convenience link for Mosier-Boss neutron finding paper.
03:36 28-04-09 [48] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: OMG, I could be reverted? I suppose I won't bother editing, then. LeadSongDog, thanks for fixing the tag.
01:34 28-04-09 [49] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: rant. Oh well, Talk page, maybe a friend will collapse and summarize,or I will.
21:20 27-04-09 [50] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: WTF? I tried to agree, then I read it again. Dangerous.
20:37 27-04-09 [51] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: respond to Enric. How to avoid undue weight: follow peer-reviewed reliable source.
20:19 27-04-09 [52] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: edits must have crossed.
20:17 27-04-09 [53] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: POV tag added.
19:48 27-04-09 [54] Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: section misrepresents sources, violates WP:SYNTH
19:42 27-04-09 [55] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: how do we determine due weight? Ask question again about "correlation."
19:22 27-04-09 [56] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Protected page edited (Spam-blacklist): don't know where "quite" came from.
19:20 27-04-09 [57] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Protected page edited (Spam-lacklist): add comment about whether actions were "right" or not. Will add diffs.
19:08 27-04-09 [58] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: new section
18:50 27-04-09 [59] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Request to narrow initial focus: fix link
17:49 27-04-09 [60] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Response to Hipocrite's evidence: new section
17:43 27-04-09 [61] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Template: Requst to narrow focus.
17:25 27-04-09 [62] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: will go ahead as a Request.
17:20 27-04-09 [63] Talk:Majority criterion Weaker than the Condorcet critereon?: fmt) (top) [rollback]
17:19 27-04-09 [64] Talk:Majority criterion Weaker than the Condorcet critereon?: the problem is a certain ambiguity in definition, which, though obvious, I have no reliable source on. Just mailing list discussions with experts.
16:57 27-04-09 [65] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents A question: just to make it clear, AMIB's behavior, even if he made a mistake, was quite proper.
14:49 27-04-09 [66] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Verifying link addition statements: disentangle this, hopefully.
11:03 27-04-09 [67] User talk:A Man In Black Ikip: answer question about what to do about spewed venom. Step aside and don't take it personally.
04:40 27-04-09 [68] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: conversation with Miles et al.
04:09 27-04-09 [69] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: fmt
04:08 27-04-09 [70] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: what's in reliable secondary source? Glad you asked? Storms, 2007.
02:56 27-04-09 [71] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG used admin tools while involved: add editing of protected blacklist page
02:41 27-04-09 [72] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Spam blacklist: support J.'s proposal.
02:38 27-04-09 [73] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop JzG and Cold Fusion: not terribly relevant.
02:32 27-04-09 [74] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Abd and dispute resolution: how could I possibly disagree with this?
02:24 27-04-09 [75] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Dispute resolution: no doubt you have some valid points, Durova, none.
02:15 27-04-09 [76] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: add link, tighten a little.
02:02 27-04-09 [77] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: bold it so that it's not so easily missed, since J. thinks it important.
02:01 27-04-09 [78] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Policy and point of view: oppose, perhaps I just don't see the purpose of saying this here.
01:50 27-04-09 [79] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Dispute resolution: add 2.2, explain.
01:39 27-04-09 [80] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Dispute resolution: comment on threats against me. They've been there, but I basically wasn't deterred. Someone else might have been.
01:27 27-04-09 [81] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Dispute resolution: general acceptance of Jehochman's proposed principle. Maybe not the best wording yet, but 2.1 is close.
01:00 27-04-09 [82] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: and furthermore....
00:42 27-04-09 [83] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: Thanks, Jehochman. Next?
00:32 27-04-09 [84] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Blocks related to Cold fusion, CF editor: fix section heading
00:30 27-04-09 [85] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: whittle, dealing with arbitrators who will actually look at diffs.
00:15 27-04-09 [86] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Fresh block, during Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: specify
00:15 27-04-09 [87] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG used admin tools while involved: Blocks and Fresh block.
23:26 26-04-09 [88] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG used admin tools while involved: Deletion
23:15 26-04-09 [89] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG used admin tools while involved: one level less
23:15 26-04-09 [90] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG used admin tools while involved: use subsection
23:14 26-04-09 [91] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG used admin tools while involved: links that won't change.
23:09 26-04-09 [92] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG used admin tools with respect to Cold fusion and editors involved.: page protection
22:54 26-04-09 [93] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Proposed motion that could simplify all this: new section
22:46 26-04-09 [94] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.
22:22 26-04-09 [95] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Spam blacklist guideline: about that guideline and my approach.
22:13 26-04-09 [96] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Verifying link addition statements: it can be done, but why? Even if those numbers are accurate (they might well be!), so what?
21:57 26-04-09 [97] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Durova's remark to me (Beetstra): Gee, I thought so too!
21:43 26-04-09 [98] Cold fusion External links: add video note
21:42 26-04-09 [99] Cold fusion External links: add updated URL and date.
21:40 26-04-09 [100] Talk:Cold fusion New URL for CBS video on cold fusion.: new section
21:03 26-04-09 [101] Infinite Energy (magazine) Definitely, Infinite Energy has been willing to explore deep fringe or even beyond. So-termed? Where did that neologism come from?
20:54 26-04-09 [102] Talk:Infinite Energy (magazine) Merge Infinite Energy (magazine) to Eugene Mallove: cite recent reference to Infinite Energy.) (top) [rollback]
20:37 26-04-09 [103] Talk:Cold fusion Some more relevant info?: collapse extended discussion.
20:29 26-04-09 [104] Talk:Cold fusion Some more relevant info?: review CR-39 early history
18:35 26-04-09 [105] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: please, someone close this.
18:25 26-04-09 [106] Cold fusion See also: great idea, Verbal.
18:21 26-04-09 [107] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: ref the use of Gall
17:53 26-04-09 [108] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: respond re EL, etc.
17:43 26-04-09 [109] Cold fusion External links: add highly notable newsletter covering the field.
17:42 26-04-09 [110] Steven B. Krivit set up redirect of notable editor name.) (top
17:39 26-04-09 [111] New Energy Times moved User:Abd/New Energy Times to New Energy Times: move draft to article space) (top
17:39 26-04-09 [112] User:Abd/New Energy Times moved User:Abd/New Energy Times to New Energy Times: move draft to article space
17:37 26-04-09 [113] New Energy Times External links: add ext link now that site no longer blacklisted.
17:29 26-04-09 [114] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: cut to the chase
17:28 26-04-09 [115] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: sign and add original timestamp.
17:25 26-04-09 [116] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: per editor request. No problem.
17:22 26-04-09 [117] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: comment tossing in a certain level of dissent within the CF community
16:29 26-04-09 [118] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: add summary statement.
16:01 26-04-09 [119] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Durova's remark to me (Beetstra): Suggest you review your evidence, Beetstra, and make sure it's really important for ArbComm review.
15:53 26-04-09 [120] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: respond to Beetstra with appreciation for his efforts.
15:43 26-04-09 [121] User talk:Abd Comment at WP:AN: s with original timestamp
15:41 26-04-09 [122] User talk:Abd Barnstar: ce
15:39 26-04-09 [123] User talk:Abd Barnstar: thanks, Ikip
15:34 26-04-09 [124] User talk:A Man In Black Ikip: about recusal and how to proceed to possibly avoid future conflict.
15:21 26-04-09 [125] User talk:A Man In Black Ncmvocalist's questions: sign it
15:20 26-04-09 [126] User talk:A Man In Black Ncmvocalist's questions: r to NCMV
15:16 26-04-09 [127] User talk:A Man In Black Ikip: It's now moot, except that you could, if you choose, clean up a bit.
15:06 26-04-09 [128] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Blocked Ikip for canvassing: not resolution of discussion and archive
14:56 26-04-09 [129] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Blocked Ikip for canvassing: suggest unblock to AMIB as a fast-resolution move, laudable.
14:50 26-04-09 [130] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Blocked Ikip for canvassing: r. to NCMV
14:43 26-04-09 [131] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Blocked Ikip for canvassing: Thanks, AMIB
14:40 26-04-09 [132] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: proposing external link to NET
14:30 26-04-09 [133] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Lewis (10th Kingdom) Virginia Lewis (10th Kingdom): Merge without prejudice
14:20 26-04-09 [134] User talk:A Man In Black Ikip: please unblock or recuse
14:15 26-04-09 [135] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Blocked Ikip for canvassing: unblock immediately, no cause for block has been shown, and there has been adequate discussion.
05:30 26-04-09 [136] User talk:Viridae Question: point out that acting admin (previous closer) was Beetstra, not JzG.
05:27 26-04-09 [137] User talk:Viridae Question: thanks again, Viridae.
05:10 26-04-09 [138] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: new section
04:55 26-04-09 [139] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: so a report issued in 1999 is a critique of a DoE presentation in 2004?
04:44 26-04-09 [140] User talk:Coppertwig providing summaries of Abd's comments: Coppertwig quite welcome to summarize.
04:19 26-04-09 [141] Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Durova's remark to me (Beetstra): comment
03:29 26-04-09 [142] User talk:Abd/Sandbox Here's a little link to keep: new section) (top) [rollback]
17:22 25-04-09 [143] User talk:Abd Comment at WP:AN: Thanks for the kind thoughts. My considerations.
15:41 25-04-09 [144] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: okay, gotta be a URL!
15:35 25-04-09 [145] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: replace current wikilinks with permalinks
14:47 25-04-09 [146] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Evidence presented by Abd: expand first section. will collapse to diffs alone, later.
13:58 25-04-09 [147] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Thanks, MastCell and Verbal.
13:00 25-04-09 [148] User talk:Abd http://newenergytimes.com delisted: of course I don't mind, that's how Wikipedia works.
03:46 25-04-09 [149] User talk:Abd http://newenergytimes.com delisted
03:42 25-04-09 [150] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Continued discussion of delisting request: note regarding closure by Viridae
03:37 25-04-09 [151] User talk:Viridae Your close of the delisting request for newenergytimes.com: new section
03:29 25-04-09 [152] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Thanks!
03:27 25-04-09 [153] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence Evidence presented by Abd: Just an outline for today. See the RfC and original RfAr statement.
03:13 25-04-09 [154] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: new section
02:57 25-04-09 [155] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: fmt
02:55 25-04-09 [156] Talk:Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: new section
01:42 25-04-09 [157] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: discussion begin on Shanahan Talk.
00:55 25-04-09 [158] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 285958266 by Abd (talk)small iPhone, big fingers.
00:22 25-04-09 [159] Talk:Cold fusion Reverted edits by Abd (talk) to last version by Objectivist
20:10 24-04-09 [160] Talk:Cold fusion Some more relevant info?: sp
20:09 24-04-09 [161] Talk:Cold fusion Some more relevant info?: on groundreport.com and the toxic (to science) climate; how things have shifted over the last ten to fifteen years.
18:28 24-04-09 [162] Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: separate what is sourced and what isn't.
15:46 24-04-09 [163] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: respond to further statements, since this hasn't been closed or a case opened.
04:58 24-04-09 [164] User talk:Abd An aside: fmt
04:58 24-04-09 [165] User talk:Abd An aside: same arguments would apply.
04:49 24-04-09 [166] Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: match what is in source. The comment about difficulty appears to be WP:SYNTH.
04:27 24-04-09 [167] Talk:Cold fusion An Overlooked Book?: fix link, use nowiki because of blacklist. Hope you don't mind, V.
02:53 24-04-09 [168] User talk:Abd An aside: thanks.
02:27 24-04-09 [169] User talk:Ss06470 A question for you: add more specific link.) (top) [rollback]
02:22 24-04-09 [170] User talk:Abd delisting of newenergytimes.com: here's why delisting first for newenergytimes.com
22:51 23-04-09 [171] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 23 Support/Oppose flagged revisions: add note re non-usage and not canvassed.
22:50 23-04-09 [172] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 23 Support/Oppose flagged revisions: strong keep.
22:43 23-04-09 [173] User talk:Alansohn Warning: recommending DR was good advice.
22:41 23-04-09 [174] User talk:Alansohn Warning: dislike repression.... notifying members of a category may be legitimate.
22:21 23-04-09 [175] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests Really good idea from Guy: about self-published works.
22:09 23-04-09 [176] User talk:Abd ADHD dispute: caution
22:05 23-04-09 [177] User talk:Abd ADHD dispute: no, I did not research your involvement. You could be right as rain or as wrong as possible, except that people who are that wrong don't usually ask for advice.
17:47 23-04-09 [178] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests Really good idea from Guy: hmmm. not sure this is approriate here, but I'm not willing to take out the comment I'm responding to!
17:30 23-04-09 [179] User talk:Abd ADHD dispute: a bit more.
17:25 23-04-09 [180] User talk:Abd ADHD dispute: okay, some tips.
13:14 23-04-09 [181] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Fringe?: note of intention to request neutral review.
11:40 23-04-09 [182] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests Really good idea from Guy: some good, as far as it goes.
23:57 22-04-09 [183] User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments clean) (top) [rollback]
21:58 22-04-09 [184] User:Abd/Sandbox draft review of RfAr response) (top) [rollback]
20:21 22-04-09 [185] User talk:Durova For better accuracy: I interpret it differently.
18:59 22-04-09 [186] User talk:Durova For better accuracy: you are right about thick skin, Durova.
18:24 22-04-09 [187] User talk:Durova For better accuracy: try again.
18:05 22-04-09 [188] User talk:Kirk shanahan Begin to narrow discussion: new section
17:42 22-04-09 [189] User talk:Spartaz Your statement at RfAr about a discussion we had.: new section
17:01 22-04-09 [190] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: Don't see the "challenge," there are some questions mixed in with noise.
16:13 22-04-09 [191] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: On Rothwell and Shanahan and my approach to understanding the topic.
16:06 22-04-09 [192] User talk:Abd April 2009: sp
16:05 22-04-09 [193] User talk:Abd April 2009: Thanks, Jehochman, but I woujld like to know what edit Verbal is talking about.
13:00 22-04-09 [194] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests A comment for public consumption: respond to SBHB
12:32 22-04-09 [195] User talk:Abd April 2009: color me impaired, please provide a diff.
05:51 22-04-09 [196] User talk:Abd/Pre-arbitration/Whig Clarification request: respond to very old question that was overlooked.) (top) [rollback]
05:40 22-04-09 [197] User talk:Durova Your comments at the RfAr for Abd and JzG: I was referring to Mathsci, whose comment was predictable. How am I doing, Durova?
05:30 22-04-09 [198] User talk:Durova For better accuracy: sorry, Durova, I hope you don't mind the screed on your Talk page.
04:53 22-04-09 [199] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests A comment for public consumption: respond.
04:28 22-04-09 [200] User talk:Jehochman Meta admins and discussions: details. I hope this is useful.
03:55 22-04-09 [201] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: respond to Shanahan, asking him to provide criticism, even if it is OR and can't be directly used in the article.
03:42 22-04-09 [202] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: challenge Shanahan to pursue consensus. Probably off this page. Out back? Seriously, my talk or his or a user page would be better.
03:23 22-04-09 [203] User talk:Durova For better accuracy: BTW, some really useful stuff the two of you have been writing.
03:20 22-04-09 [204] User talk:Durova For better accuracy: dropping into the middle of a nice discussion or is it a cat fight? forgive my clumsiness.
02:56 22-04-09 [205] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: thanks, Jehochman, I think you missed a few things.
02:30 22-04-09 [206] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: response re meta discussions.
01:53 22-04-09 [207] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: oops, fix a possible error.
01:49 22-04-09 [208] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: reply to Shanahan, a published expert in the field, by the way.
01:26 22-04-09 [209] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: respond to Newyorkbrad
18:53 21-04-09 [210] Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder Dispute resolution: suggest RfC if dispute still exists. Please, all sides, seek consensus.
18:32 21-04-09 [211] User talk:Durova Your comments at the RfAr for Abd and JzG: new section
18:19 21-04-09 [212] User talk:Abd Please trim your statement on requests for arbitration: thanks, KnightLago.
18:14 21-04-09 [213] User talk:Abd RFAR: more comments about the RfAr
17:52 21-04-09 [214] Talk:Cold fusion New paper out: comment on new paper and New Energy Times
17:21 21-04-09 [215] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: how about biological transmutation? Fringe enough? I'm not making that edit today!
16:56 21-04-09 [216] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of comments from this page: article content is stricter than Talk, not less restrictive. Mention RfAr and involvement of those who comment there.
16:37 21-04-09 [217] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: emphasize, given contrary claims elsewhere.
16:19 21-04-09 [218] User:Abd/Majority POV-pushing copy edit) (top) [rollback]
16:14 21-04-09 [219] User:Abd/Majority POV-pushing ital
16:12 21-04-09 [220] User:Abd/Majority POV-pushing begin essay
15:24 21-04-09 [221] User talk:Abd RFAR: Thanks again, Jehochman.
15:01 21-04-09 [222] User talk:Abd ADHD: fmt
15:01 21-04-09 [223] User talk:Abd ADHD: I'll look if I have time.
14:51 21-04-09 [224] User talk:Abd Page of Shibdas Ghosh, Linked to SUCI: be very careful about sockpuppet charges.
13:18 21-04-09 [225] User talk:Mr.Z-man Please undelete User talk:JedRothwell: new section
02:32 21-04-09 [226] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Fringe?: inspired by Durova's apostrophe demon.
02:25 21-04-09 [227] User talk:Abd/Archive 9 add section to archive early
02:21 21-04-09 [228] User talk:Abd Strike 3?: remove section to archive manually. editor going ballistic, interpreting words losing AGF, communication breaks down.
02:05 21-04-09 [229] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: edit per request by clerk.
01:25 21-04-09 [230] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: The most important issue is recusal. If there was no recusal failure, *then* my behavior was outrageous. Complainants against me should be parties to an arbitration over my behavior.
19:33 20-04-09 [231] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of comments from this page: no position asserted here that edits of banned editors can't be removed. Don't misrepresent the problem.
19:28 20-04-09 [232] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: wrong one!
19:27 20-04-09 [233] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: fix nowiki link.
19:25 20-04-09 [234] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: link to discussion of report.
19:20 20-04-09 [235] User talk:Abd Strike 3?: let's see where the discussion goes.
17:03 20-04-09 [236] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: restate
16:22 20-04-09 [237] User talk:Abd RFAR: weird
16:16 20-04-09 [238] User talk:Abd RFAR: Fasten seat belts. Here we go.
16:11 20-04-09 [239] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by Abd: add statement as involved party
15:58 20-04-09 [240] User talk:Abd Strike 3?: and what? I'm out? answer Beetstra's questions.
15:13 20-04-09 [241] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Fringe?: link was asserted as an example showing both sides. There is quite valuable information there, and also editorial comment and some selective presentation of fact.
15:05 20-04-09 [242] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: sp
15:05 20-04-09 [243] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: Actually, I asked Krivit.
14:55 20-04-09 [244] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add diff of removal by Verbal.
14:51 20-04-09 [245] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: well-established that editors may restore useful edits from banned editors.
14:14 20-04-09 [246] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: haven't seen the actual report, I think. I'll ask those who should know.
14:04 20-04-09 [247] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: stopped, whether right or wrong. Now, the topic here?
14:01 20-04-09 [248] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: r to Bilby.
04:42 20-04-09 [249] Talk:Cold fusion one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: add a source from a nuclear physicist who gives much more commentary.
04:10 20-04-09 [250] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Fringe?: make link visible.
04:06 20-04-09 [251] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add ref to Talk page.
04:05 20-04-09 [252] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: separate Verbal's fantasy from my comment.
03:38 20-04-09 [253] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: full program link
23:40 19-04-09 [254] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Fringe?: The link was redundant.
21:25 19-04-09 [255] User talk:Fritzpoll Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: thanks, Fritzpoll, I'll ask the bot operator.
16:39 19-04-09 [256] User talk:Fritzpoll Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: actually, wikitext isn't enough at all.
16:35 19-04-09 [257] User talk:Fritzpoll Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: sorry, clarify one point and I presume we are done, thanks for considering this.
16:30 19-04-09 [258] User talk:Fritzpoll Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: answer question raised, thanks for considering the matter, sorry to bother you.
16:09 19-04-09 [259] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Sockpuppetry case: friendly warning to Radhakirshnansk.
15:59 19-04-09 [260] User talk:Verbal Abd again: are you sure you want to stand on an oxymoron?
15:49 19-04-09 [261] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of comments from this page: why this instead of AN/I?
15:46 19-04-09 [262] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of comments from this page: what violation of WP:TALK?
15:35 19-04-09 [263] Cooper Brown a bit clearer that this is a totally unverified assertion, probably part of the spoof.) (top) [rollback]
13:46 19-04-09 [264] Talk:Cold fusion Removal of comments from this page: new section
13:17 19-04-09 [265] User talk:Verbal Abd again: please suggest mediator.
13:06 19-04-09 [266] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: okay: I'm not the moose and I'm not the train. What you see is only my face.
05:23 19-04-09 [267] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: point to NET article on CBS documentary
05:12 19-04-09 [268] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Fringe?: example of NET reporting.
04:55 19-04-09 [269] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: thanks, Franamax, go in peace.
04:46 19-04-09 [270] User talk:Verbal April 2006: new section
04:35 19-04-09 [271] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 284671040 by Verbal (talk)preposterous reason given for removal.
04:22 19-04-09 [272] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: respond to Beetstra with apology for possible misrepresentation. So confusing now that I'm not sure.
04:10 19-04-09 [273] User talk:Fritzpoll Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: history and reason for request
03:46 19-04-09 [274] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: you may consider there is a ban if you like, and we may consider there is none if we like. It's moot, in fact.
17:34 18-04-09 [275] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: remove redundant secition, smalltext comment about it.
17:28 18-04-09 [276] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: perhaps, Beetstra, I'll check. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, ....
17:27 18-04-09 [277] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: perhaps, Beetstra, I'll check. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, ....
17:12 18-04-09 [278] User talk:Fritzpoll Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: new section
17:06 18-04-09 [279] User talk:Fritzpoll Barnstar: great work, Fritzpoll.
17:05 18-04-09 [280] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: okay, I apologize, Beetstra, you are at least technically correct, once I examined the highlighted words.
16:54 18-04-09 [281] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: to continue on the substance.....
15:59 18-04-09 [282] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: tighten
15:57 18-04-09 [283] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: fix ital, add not about block.
15:56 18-04-09 [284] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: I don't get it, what "twist"?
15:29 18-04-09 [285] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: respond to Noren's misunderstanding of my text. Address MastCell involvement.
14:14 18-04-09 [286] User talk:Abd Misinterpretations: reply beginning
13:28 18-04-09 [287] User talk:Coppertwig enabling banned users: fix link
13:28 18-04-09 [288] User talk:Coppertwig enabling banned users: examination of ban argument. This is a poster boy for WP: "Community decisions" are not made except by a neutral close, closer becomes responsible.
13:06 18-04-09 [289] User talk:Abd Discussion with Jed Rothwell moved from Talk:Cold fusion: comment
12:57 18-04-09 [290] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: fix permanent link to more complete transfer.
12:54 18-04-09 [291] User talk:Abd Discussion with Jed Rothwell moved from Talk:Cold fusion: fuller content, I missed the earlier revert by Enric Naval.
12:48 18-04-09 [292] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: Thanks, Verbal, much better than collapse or link to history.
12:43 18-04-09 [293] User talk:Abd Discussion with User:Jed Rothwell| moved from Talk:Cold fusion: new section
12:38 18-04-09 [294] User talk:Spartaz Thanks, I'm flattered.: new section
12:29 18-04-09 [295] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: no, there were three basic reasons given: "promotion" which wasn't, copyvio which didn't exist, and fringe *site*.
12:20 18-04-09 [296] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: reference User:Abd/JedRothwell and note emerging process.
12:13 18-04-09 [297] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: fmt
12:10 18-04-09 [298] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: issues. and go away, Enric, just to make that clear for the record.
05:06 18-04-09 [299] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: ref to removed discussion, so that remaining discussion has context.
04:49 18-04-09 [300] Talk:Cold fusion Enric, you can revert Rothwell, not Coppertwig
04:44 18-04-09 [301] User:Abd/JedRothwell create page reviewing edits of Jed Rothwell) (top
03:24 18-04-09 [302] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: Thanks, Noren. That reminds me of how to proceed.
03:19 18-04-09 [303] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: discussion was not as described. I did not voice any opinions other than my own, and I can bring in notable opinion from an expert, fringe or not.
22:53 17-04-09 [304] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: one more, apparently.
22:52 17-04-09 [305] Talk:Cold fusion Sheesh, how many times does it take?
22:49 17-04-09 [306] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: fmt
22:49 17-04-09 [307] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: the ACS seminar was a turning point, but it might have slipped below the radar. The CBS documentary is sealing the shift, quite likely, barring some spectacular refutation.
22:43 17-04-09 [308] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: collapse discussion, it's long
22:41 17-04-09 [309] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: intention to respond.
22:34 17-04-09 [310] User talk:Abd not exactly on break, though editing may be spotty.
22:33 17-04-09 [311] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: what actions, exactly, were offensive?
22:12 17-04-09 [312] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: of course I'll stop because of the warning, but will pursue dispute resolution.
22:10 17-04-09 [313] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: respond, cite presentation by Kitamura et al.
21:27 17-04-09 [314] Talk:Cold fusion thanks, Verbal, I'll take responsibility for the freedom from abuse of this edit.
20:27 17-04-09 [315] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: respond.
20:15 17-04-09 [316] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: no bet, because this nitwit will erase the gratuitous paragraph, leaving the rest, which is of interest. The comment is still in history, of course.
17:31 17-04-09 [317] User talk:Ronnotel Thanks for your comments on the blacklist page: new section
16:50 17-04-09 [318] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: agree with Ronnotel and be specific about it
15:52 17-04-09 [319] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add NET report
15:44 17-04-09 [320] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist fringe?: new subsection for newenergytimes.com
15:29 17-04-09 [321] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add ack of possibility of not-palladium.
15:18 17-04-09 [322] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: thanks, Jed. No longer "fringe" but "cutting edge," still, I'm sure, controversial.
14:38 17-04-09 [323] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Motion to close: agree with NCMV
02:41 17-04-09 [324] Talk:Cold fusion CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: new section
22:19 16-04-09 [325] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment Proposed solutions section in RFC/U: question probably moot at this time.
22:11 16-04-09 [326] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Should the new possible "block while involved" be moved to the RfC page?: thanks, Fritzpoll, but I think the closing trumps this.
22:06 16-04-09 [327] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Motion to close: agree, close.
22:03 16-04-09 [328] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: please don't create more useless discussion
22:01 16-04-09 [329] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Remove Proposed solutions section. I'm supporting Spartaz here, because I don't see further discussion here as serving a purpose. The time for this would have been a week ago.
21:54 16-04-09 [330] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: Thanks, Ronnotel, I agree. At one time, I even would have agreed with "not RS," but I now see the matter as more complex.
21:41 16-04-09 [331] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: there wasn't abuse going on when the sites were blacklisted.
17:58 16-04-09 [332] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: *isn't reliable source* is not a legitimate reason for blacklisting in the absence of linkspam.
17:41 16-04-09 [333] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: sign
17:41 16-04-09 [334] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: sp
17:36 16-04-09 [335] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: a separate Proposed resolution section is not needed, in fact.
17:24 16-04-09 [336] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: respond to Verbal's flap.
17:01 16-04-09 [337] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Claim of canvassing re certification: JzG's comment was misleading, but not wrong. Dtobias did certify, as the fourth certifier. Really moot.
16:41 16-04-09 [338] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: Bilby is correct.
16:30 16-04-09 [339] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Should the new possible "block while involved" be moved to the RfC page?: not quite consensus yet, my opinion.
16:25 16-04-09 [340] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 New use of tools while involved.: create subsection for question
16:23 16-04-09 [341] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 move to subsection of question asked by Rlevse
16:19 16-04-09 [342] User talk:Abd User:Abd/Notices#Advice_solicited_re_likely_appeal_to_ArbComm: respond to Coppertwig
16:17 16-04-09 [343] User talk:Abd Sigh: respond to FP and Verbal.
14:16 16-04-09 [344] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 New use of tools while involved.: any objections to making a new RfC section on this?
14:07 16-04-09 [345] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Claim of canvassing re certification: Thanks, Coppertwig. Why the comments about RfAr are appropriate here.
13:55 16-04-09 [346] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 New use of tools while involved.: no objection to speedy close.
13:43 16-04-09 [347] User talk:Abd Sigh: sigh, indeed.
13:36 16-04-09 [348] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 New use of tools while involved.: Thanks, Fritzpoll. More explanation of why it's here and why not in the RfC project page itself.
13:20 16-04-09 [349] User talk:Abd Sigh: Thanks, Fritzpoll, but I think you are incorrect, and that efforts should be directed in the other direction, asking JzG to resolve this quickly by acknowledging the obvious.
11:25 16-04-09 [350] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: talk about dead horse.
11:14 16-04-09 [351] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 New use of tools while involved.: including could be seen as harassment, Spartaz
11:03 16-04-09 [352] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Comment on Jehochman's view: why I took out the desired outcome of apology.
02:39 16-04-09 [353] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent JzG edit: it may not be as you see, Bilby
02:34 16-04-09 [354] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 New use of tools while involved.: No, not to be added to the RfC itself.
02:20 16-04-09 [355] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 New use of tools while involved.: new section
00:18 16-04-09 [356] User talk:Peregrine Fisher Your delisting request at MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist for aceshowbiz.com: new section
23:28 15-04-09 [357] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist aceshowbiz.com: I'll advise the editor on editor's Talk.
23:14 15-04-09 [358] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent JzG edit: Maybe you could do something useful, Spartaz.
23:02 15-04-09 [359] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Claim of canvassing re certification: wikilink
23:01 15-04-09 [360] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Claim of canvassing re certification: fmt
23:00 15-04-09 [361] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: see "Desired outcome." add new section re canvassing claim.
21:55 15-04-09 [362] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent JzG edit: the summarization is legitimate and appreciated.
19:12 15-04-09 [363] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent JzG edit: no claim that JzG broke a rule with this, just his own promise, relied upon by some for useless arguments here.
19:06 15-04-09 [364] User talk:Abd Lenr-canr.org: detailed response to Beetstra
17:19 15-04-09 [365] User talk:Coppertwig distastefullness: Great, MM, good response.
17:04 15-04-09 [366] User talk:Abd compliments: talk is cheap, and therefore should be spent, in a good way, freely
11:08 15-04-09 [367] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: it's *our* fault for not restraining JzG.
10:28 15-04-09 [368] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: mudshield.
02:27 15-04-09 [369] User talk:Coppertwig distastefullness: well, I tiptoed in, stood up on a soapbox, and made a long speech before remembering where I was.
01:41 15-04-09 [370] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: long, unfortunately. It usually takes more words to counter deceptive arguments, and I don't have time to abstract this tonight.
00:04 15-04-09 [371] User talk:Abd the blacklisting at meta: lenr-canr.org subsection on the original meta blacklisting at JzG's request
21:49 14-04-09 [372] User talk:Abd Lenr-canr.org: long. Sorry, Beetstra, if you need abstracts, I'll write them. About my involvement with cold fusion at the moment.
19:11 14-04-09 [373] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: Thanks, Guy. Kooks? Who was edit warring except for yourself, against consensus?
18:19 14-04-09 [374] User talk:Abd newenergytimes.com: specific arguments.
17:42 14-04-09 [375] User talk:Abd Lenr-canr.org: let's look at what you wrote, then, and correct any misunderstanding.
14:44 14-04-09 [376] User talk:Abd Lenr-canr.org: this gets into the content issue, big time.
13:55 14-04-09 [377] User talk:Abd newenergytimes.com: time to empty the can of worms and take a good look?
11:09 14-04-09 [378] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: copy edit
11:06 14-04-09 [379] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: thanks for being clear about your position, Beetstra
10:55 14-04-09 [380] User talk:Abd New Energy Times article: thanks, I've been thinking so myself
02:24 14-04-09 [381] User talk:Coppertwig distastefullness: peep!
01:52 14-04-09 [382] New Energy Times misc. citations, etc.
01:18 14-04-09 [383] New Energy Times acronym not needed
22:21 13-04-09 [384] N ray more accurate and complete.
21:35 13-04-09 [385] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: Arbcomm was mentioned as *not* making content decisions. That's what I wrote, you repeated it as if it contradicted me. Why?
18:39 13-04-09 [386] User talk:Rlevse Your question at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section
18:21 13-04-09 [387] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: the expanded use of the blacklist puts far-reaching content decisions into the hands of a small group of administrators that even ArbComm would not touch.
18:14 13-04-09 [388] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: examples of abuse such that the blacklisting was appropriate? And is undue weight really an argument for blacklisting? That has to do with particular edits, in balance. Cutting out one side is not likely to result in balance!
17:38 13-04-09 [389] New Energy Times match other reference from article on alternating columnist at Analog
17:31 13-04-09 [390] New Energy Times a
15:48 13-04-09 [391] New Energy Times add news.science.com reference
15:26 13-04-09 [392] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: agree, except that if content arguments are the reason for blacklisting, then blacklisting becomes a content decision.
13:53 13-04-09 [393] User talk:Abd/Notices/Comments link to archived discussion: Thanks, helpful.) (top) [rollback]
12:21 13-04-09 [394] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: Thanks, Beetstra. Links will be highly scrutinized at the relevant articles, as with prior whitelisting for lenr-canr.org.
11:27 13-04-09 [395] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: Point me to the decision.
01:46 13-04-09 [396] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: fmt
01:45 13-04-09 [397] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: sorry Cla68, I think I wasn't clear.
01:35 13-04-09 [398] User:Abd/Cold fusion Considerations: add Hoffman quote re calorimetry.) (top) [rollback]
01:23 13-04-09 [399] User:Abd/Cold fusion essay at this point.
23:42 12-04-09 [400] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: only one complaint in this RfC, not the multiplicity of mirrors Phil flashes to distract
19:40 12-04-09 [401] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Law Support: support
18:26 12-04-09 [402] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist newenergytimes.com: delist because there was and is no basis for listing.
15:31 12-04-09 [403] User talk:Abd User:Abd/Notices#Advice_solicited_re_likely_appeal_to_ArbComm: new section
15:24 12-04-09 [404] User:Abd/Notices Advice solicited re likely appeal to ArbComm: re proceeding to AC with the JzG charges.) (top) [rollback]
13:50 12-04-09 [405] Nikola Tesla doesn't say "Military Border." Croation Krajina was a part of the Military Border region. More specific. Please discuss in Talk before making this removal again.
04:01 12-04-09 [406] New Energy Times comma
03:56 12-04-09 [407] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: not worth debating.
03:30 12-04-09 [408] User:Abd/Lyrikline poets mark links placed) (top) [rollback]
03:25 12-04-09 [409] Durs Grünbein External links: lyrikline.org) (top) [rollback]
03:21 12-04-09 [410] Richard Huelsenbeck Audio: lyrikline.org
03:18 12-04-09 [411] Norbert Hummelt External links: lyrikline.org page
02:57 12-04-09 [412] John Bockris Cold fusion: correct year to 1989, and research continued at least well into the 1990s.
01:42 12-04-09 [413] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: The issue of administrative recusal has not been considered in any other forum where a decision was made on it.
19:50 11-04-09 [414] New Energy Times sp
19:38 11-04-09 [415] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Recent abuse: respond to Rlevse, Skinwalker, and Spartaz
15:49 11-04-09 [416] User talk:Abd newenergytimes.com: add ref to draft article and delisting request
15:42 11-04-09 [417] User talk:Abd Wikibreak.: fmt
15:40 11-04-09 [418] User talk:Abd Wikibreak.: No, I haven't walked away. I'm busy.
15:18 11-04-09 [419] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Proposed removals: newenergytimes.com
14:38 11-04-09 [420] New Energy Times don't need the full name again.
14:35 11-04-09 [421] New Energy Times add new scientist source
14:19 11-04-09 [422] New Energy Times NEI is nonprofit.
14:18 11-04-09 [423] New Energy Times add Houston Chronicle source. page has vanished, but it was in the cache.
13:56 11-04-09 [424] New Energy Times journalist, capital
13:54 11-04-09 [425] New Energy Times begin stub
12:25 11-04-09 [426] User talk:ScienceApologist Link to AE request re ScienceApologist: why I fully support SA's work on this revision and the community's effort to accomodate it.
03:17 11-04-09 [427] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Reply to Fritzpoll's view: lenr-canr.org blacklisting was not reversed.
03:03 11-04-09 [428] User talk:Abd newenergytimes.com: this is redundant, will confuse links
02:59 11-04-09 [429] User talk:Abd newenergytimes.com
02:47 11-04-09 [430] User talk:Abd Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: collapse extended discussion
11:18 10-04-09 [431] User talk:Abd I have to admit: thanks for the pretty drawing, may I borrow your crayons? My mommy says, though, that you have to go away, she won't let you harass me any more.
03:58 10-04-09 [432] Talk:Cold fusion recent RS reviiewing the topic of cold fusion: link
03:56 10-04-09 [433] Talk:Cold fusion recent RS reviiewing the topic of cold fusion: fmt
03:55 10-04-09 [434] Talk:Cold fusion recent RS reviiewing the topic of cold fusion: new section
17:03 09-04-09 [435] User talk:Abd I have to admit: Thanks, Coppertwig. You are correct.
16:34 09-04-09 [436] User talk:Abd Wikibreak.: Thanks, Ikip, for moving the off-topic comment to the RfC/JzG talk page. Considerations. At length. Beware of dog-vomit slime mold.
13:19 09-04-09 [437] User talk:Abd Please check your email: okay, I will.
12:28 09-04-09 [438] User talk:Abd no hounding, but thanks.
12:07 09-04-09 [439] User talk:Abd Wikibreak.: new section
12:03 09-04-09 [440] User talk:Abd wikibreak template
02:06 09-04-09 [441] User talk:Off2riorob True colors: True color: clean and clear, the color of a perfect mirror.
01:33 09-04-09 [442] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by User:Ronnotel: clarify. The "linkspamming" claimed isn't prevented by the blacklist, you can see that here. There was no http://
01:18 09-04-09 [443] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Stay on target: Rothwell is indeed an expert, and I intend to prove it. But not today and not here. It's not central.
01:03 09-04-09 [444] User talk:Jehochman Subheader: fmt
01:03 09-04-09 [445] User talk:Jehochman Subheader: With apologies, Jehochman, as always, it's your call what takes place on your Talk page.
00:36 09-04-09 [446] Talk:Optics Simple decision. Which is better, right now, Wikisource article or this one?: I'm not seeing any claim that the article there is not better.
21:02 08-04-09 [447] Talk:Optics By way of explanation: SA deserves full and open credit for good work.
20:39 08-04-09 [448] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Stay on target: explain mention of sysop bit.
20:36 08-04-09 [449] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Stay on target: if Hipocrite read the RfC, he didn't retain it. 2 websites, not one. 2 editors, not one.
20:21 08-04-09 [450] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 On the closing of this RfC: "not standard"? Of course it's not standard! "Standard" isn't likely to resolve this short of ArbComm. But it's not my decision. I propose, you dispose.
18:09 08-04-09 [451] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 On the closing of this RfC: Yes, Durova. However ....
18:05 08-04-09 [452] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Stay on target: JzG is not required to respond. He is merely allowed to. If he does not, there are natural consequences that are not punishment.
17:57 08-04-09 [453] User talk:Fritzpoll Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll
17:50 08-04-09 [454] User talk:Jehochman Elegent, but useless: speak of the devil.
17:37 08-04-09 [455] User talk:ScienceApologist Link to AE request re ScienceApologist: I don't think it should wait for the, what, five months?
17:19 08-04-09 [456] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Guy, where are you?: thanks, Jehochman. Maybe it will work. It's getting late, though, the delay is itself a concern. Consider this disruption!
17:04 08-04-09 [457] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 On the closing of this RfC: inadequate. Your move, community and TIA.
16:54 08-04-09 [458] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Limits on RfC: Agreed completely. But then .....
16:35 08-04-09 [459] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 On the closing of this RfC: have it your way: Community, it's up to you.
16:26 08-04-09 [460] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding: Administrators, absent emergency, must recuse themselves where involved.: new section
16:24 08-04-09 [461] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding: JzG unilaterally and without notice at Cold fusion blacklisted two web sites relating to Cold fusion, supporting his own edits.: add long term. This was not mere routine removal of blacklisted links.
16:23 08-04-09 [462] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding: JzG protected an article in his preferred version into a redirect to Cold fusion.: new section
16:20 08-04-09 [463] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding: JzG unilaterally and without notice at Cold fusion blacklisted two web sites relating to Cold fusion, supporting his own edits.: new section
16:17 08-04-09 [464] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding:JzG used administrative tools affecting Cold fusion and its editors: Get rid of this one for the moment, make more specific.
16:16 08-04-09 [465] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding:(re block of editor while in dispute
16:12 08-04-09 [466] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding:JzG used administrative tools affecting Cold fusion and its editors: new section
16:06 08-04-09 [467] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Proposed finding:JzG was involved with Cold fusion: new section
16:02 08-04-09 [468] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 On the closing of this RfC: new section
15:32 08-04-09 [469] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Comment on Jehochman's view: Done.
15:30 08-04-09 [470] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Limits on RfC: new section
15:16 08-04-09 [471] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 use strikout for removal per request by Jehochman, showing original text. Apology would be nice, but is not necessary.
15:13 08-04-09 [472] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Comment on Jehochman's view: Sure, I'll check that.
15:10 08-04-09 [473] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Guy, where are you?: Thanks, Jehochman. I hope he listens.
14:57 08-04-09 [474] User talk:Abd Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: Welcome, Rfwoolf, to Abd Talk. Beware my pet dog-vomit slime mold in the corner, but have some coffee or tea. Take your time.
14:48 08-04-09 [475] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Cla68: replace subsection of Clas68 comment. This is not threaded reply, but extended comment within a comment section.
14:45 08-04-09 [476] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Comment on Jehochman's view: explain my edit that will follow to the project page.
14:36 08-04-09 [477] User talk:Abd I have to admit: if what I write is too long, simple solution: don't read it. It's not an article edit or a warning! (it might contain a warning, but if I bury a warning, it's ineffective.
14:32 08-04-09 [478] User talk:Abd reference to old self-RfC is no longer needed. If it reopens, I'll put it back.
14:30 08-04-09 [479] User talk:Abd Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: fmt
14:30 08-04-09 [480] User talk:Abd Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: Thanks, Fritzpoll, you are always helpful.
13:59 08-04-09 [481] User talk:Abd Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: Thanks for the shocking information, Dr. Blofeld, I need to adjust my medication.
11:05 08-04-09 [482] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Stay on target: there is no consensus. I'm not in charge.
10:52 08-04-09 [483] User talk:Abd I have to admit: Thanks.
04:03 08-04-09 [484] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: this was an error. fix it.
03:15 08-04-09 [485] User talk:LirazSiri RFC on JzG: fmt
03:15 08-04-09 [486] User talk:LirazSiri RFC on JzG: fmt
03:15 08-04-09 [487] User talk:LirazSiri RFC on JzG: why this is different.
02:49 08-04-09 [488] User talk:Abd I have to admit: Go away. I suspect that's clear.
02:45 08-04-09 [489] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Undid revision 282428951 by Mathsci (talk)This is so preposterous, I'm reverting. Please do not remove my additions, I did not change your header, you removed my content.
02:40 08-04-09 [490] Talk:Cold fusion Major lead problems: respond to Noren, mischaracterization of my prior Talk statement.
02:09 08-04-09 [491] User talk:Abd I have to admit: So rude, I'm afraid. My talk page. No obligation to read. So ... why not ignore it if it was too long? Something is drastically wrong wtih this place.
02:00 08-04-09 [492] User talk:PJHaseldine Your self-reverted edits at Pan Am Flight 103: new section
01:45 08-04-09 [493] User talk:Abd I have to admit: fmt
01:43 08-04-09 [494] User talk:Abd I have to admit: glad I brightened your day.
01:29 08-04-09 [495] Talk:Optics Simple decision. Which is better, right now, Wikisource article or this one?: new section
01:14 08-04-09 [496] User talk:Abd On topic: beware of ABF
01:00 08-04-09 [497] User talk:Fritzpoll Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll
00:46 08-04-09 [498] Talk:University of Atlanta UNVEILED: about using the work of Mistro12
00:27 08-04-09 [499] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement Discussion concerning ScienceApologist: SA did not violate his ban, and is allowed to suggest anything he wants off-wiki. It's moot at this point.
00:17 08-04-09 [500] User talk:ScienceApologist Link to AE request re Science Apologist: fix username and promise supportive comment at AE
00:15 08-04-09 [501] User talk:ScienceApologist Optics: give notice subhead, while this isn't worthy of SA's attention, it's his right to see it or remove it.
00:13 08-04-09 [502] User talk:ScienceApologist Undid revision 282443930 by KP Botany (talk)remove baiting, keep link to AE
23:59 07-04-09 [503] User talk:98.240.215.87 General note: Editing tests on Talk:Egypt (disambiguation). (TW)) (top
23:57 07-04-09 [504] Talk:Egypt (disambiguation) Revert to the revision prior to revision 282451284 dated 2009-04-07 23:55:44 by 98.240.215.87 using popups
23:55 07-04-09 [505] User talk:76.5.25.239 General note: Vandalism on Winternats. (TW)) (top
23:52 07-04-09 [506] Winternats Reverted edits by 76.5.25.239 (talk) to last version by Julianhope
23:34 07-04-09 [507] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Hipocrite: remove argument against comment in comment section. Don't like this? Please revert me, taking responsibility for it. Hipocrite could clearly do that.
23:31 07-04-09 [508] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Jehochman: bold acknowledgement about "apology" and removal from Desired Outcome.
23:30 07-04-09 [509] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Comment on Jehochman's view: Acknowledgment of the error has been crucial in the past to ArbComm "forgiving" admin action while involved. #
23:24 07-04-09 [510] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Stay on target: Thanks, Jehochman.
23:12 07-04-09 [511] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Stay on target: no objection to rapid close, but some may, indeed, object, and for good reason.
23:01 07-04-09 [512] User talk:Abd RfC talk page: respond to Mathsci
22:26 07-04-09 [513] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Or, why is Abd allowed to edit Cold Fusion pages, exactly?: Done, and start to clean up a little of the shit.
21:47 07-04-09 [514] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Or, why is Abd allowed to edit Cold Fusion pages, exactly?: link
21:45 07-04-09 [515] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Subsection: I believe I can preface my comment with a section it's own subsection header. When editors ask for something silly but harmless, give it to them.
21:40 07-04-09 [516] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Subsection: refactor per polite Mathsci request. Anything else?
19:17 07-04-09 [517] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Subheader: give it a name
19:09 07-04-09 [518] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Subheader: if we want to know consensus, a modest proposal.
18:59 07-04-09 [519] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Subheader: Mathsci, stop trying to derail this user RfC with incivility and debate over content
18:49 07-04-09 [520] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: link to discussion of additional history of blacklisting
18:38 07-04-09 [521] User talk:Abd Arbitration: Ignoring the RfC results is not an option for me, but even a landslide at RfC has no right to sanction or even discourage appeal to ArbComm, only ArbComm decides that.
18:24 07-04-09 [522] User talk:Abd Arbitration: if there is error in the evidence, now might be the time to point that out!
18:05 07-04-09 [523] User talk:Abd Advice: It was sincere and honest, not sarcastic at all, not belittling. And a story.
17:43 07-04-09 [524] User talk:Abd Arbitration: respond in detail to Spartaz
14:56 07-04-09 [525] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Subheader: Yes, Coppertwig, you got it right. Implications regarding ArbComm and inflammatory comments here.
13:33 07-04-09 [526] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Subheader: on concise vs. extended.
03:26 07-04-09 [527] Cold fusion Methods that rely on the particular characteristics of lattice: simplify
03:24 07-04-09 [528] Cold fusion Proposed explanations: attribute POV, it maybe should come out entirely, it's bullshit, but, hey, RS isRS. This should be updated, actually.
03:08 07-04-09 [529] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Jehochman: clarify that "not been perfect" is inadequate. It was blatant violation.
03:04 07-04-09 [530] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Jehochman: extra # not allowed.
03:03 07-04-09 [531] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Jehochman: wherein User:Abd admits sekrit fringe doo-doo project while nefariously endorsing Jehochman comment to present appearance of reasonableness.
02:51 07-04-09 [532] User talk:GoRight Don't poke the bear: minor) (top) [rollback]
02:48 07-04-09 [533] User talk:GoRight Don't poke the bear: fign and format
02:47 07-04-09 [534] User talk:GoRight Don't poke the bear: depression is the bitter part of valerian root of all evil, and it is obviously late, too little sleep.
02:30 07-04-09 [535] User talk:GoRight Don't poke the bear: On Bears. An Unexpected Suggestion?
01:56 07-04-09 [536] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Desired outcome: apology would be nice, but not necessary. Per Jehochman.
01:42 07-04-09 [537] User talk:Abd Advice: I understand the issue. "Apology" isn't the issue, really, it's an assurance that he *understands the problem.*
19:45 06-04-09 [538] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 In response to JzG's comments: pop media coverage, peer-reviewed coverage is overwhelmingly on the low-energy nuclear reactions side.
19:42 06-04-09 [539] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 In response to JzG's comments: I suppose I should answer this straight and to the point.
19:18 06-04-09 [540] User talk:Abd Advice: respond to Jehochman. I've been trying for months to encourage a friend of JzG to give him good advice.
18:50 06-04-09 [541] User talk:Abd Lyrikline.org: subsections
18:48 06-04-09 [542] User talk:Abd Lyrikline.org: add Beetstra original
18:46 06-04-09 [543] User talk:Abd Lyrikline.org
17:40 06-04-09 [544] User talk:Abd University of Atlanta: I think we agree quite closely on this specific case, we still have work to do on overall policy or practice.
13:40 06-04-09 [545] User talk:Abd University of Atlanta: level
13:39 06-04-09 [546] User talk:Abd University of Atlanta: start subsection
13:32 06-04-09 [547] User talk:Abd Groundrules and accepted background: fmt
13:30 06-04-09 [548] User talk:Abd Groundrules and accepted background: comment on "unresolved disagreements. Example of original lenr-canr.org delisting closure.
13:14 06-04-09 [549] User talk:Abd My thoughts on this
11:26 06-04-09 [550] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Cla68: Endorse. Over the line, head and shoulders, torso and feet.
11:02 06-04-09 [551] User talk:Abd Advice: Arbcomm did not rule on JzG's request. The claim of Arbitration enforcement was rejected.
05:13 06-04-09 [552] User talk:Abd Advice: I wouldn't object.
04:42 06-04-09 [553] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Certification by Durova: Isn
04:12 06-04-09 [554] User talk:Abd Advice: Thanks, Jehochman. But that wasn't sarcastic. I meant it.
03:08 06-04-09 [555] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Certification by Durova: Admin recusal is not optional. It's the most reliable way to lose an admin bit.
02:40 06-04-09 [556] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Certification: fmt
02:03 06-04-09 [557] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Recusal when involved is not optional, some silly detail.
01:30 06-04-09 [558] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Is certification invalid if a certifier is involved in a dispute?
01:08 06-04-09 [559] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Certification by Durova: certification based based on specific attempt to address admin recusal. I do know what I'm doing, even though I'm not Kim Bruning.
00:48 06-04-09 [560] Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3 incomplete timeline of blacklisting of lenr-canr.org: the other items are not relevant to the RfC.
00:43 06-04-09 [561] User talk:Abd MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Guy, You really know how to shoot yourself in the foot. Consider the other MfD you filed, the RfC was caused by that.
00:30 06-04-09 [562] User talk:Abd Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: you don't like me verbose, you will *really* not like me brief.
00:13 06-04-09 [563] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by User:Ronnotel: endorse
23:46 05-04-09 [564] User talk:Abd Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: beware, reading this may be dangerous to your mental health.
19:49 05-04-09 [565] Talk:Cold fusion DOE reviews question: inconclusive mechanism versus [promising?] observations?: okay, let's look at this.
19:29 05-04-09 [566] Talk:Cold fusion DOE reviews question: inconclusive mechanism versus [promising?] observations?: format
19:26 05-04-09 [567] Talk:Cold fusion DOE reviews question: inconclusive mechanism versus [promising?] observations?: The latest DOE review clearly considered the matter worthy of further research.
18:34 05-04-09 [568] User talk:Ikip RFC JZG 3: See below. I agree, Spartaz. Especially about "smartened up."
18:32 05-04-09 [569] User talk:Ikip Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section
18:20 05-04-09 [570] User talk:GoRight Don't poke the bear: and apologize.
18:16 05-04-09 [571] User talk:GoRight Don't poke the bear: WARNING, for your wikihealth, do not make one more edit before you redact and apologize.
16:05 05-04-09 [572] User talk:Fritzpoll Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll, and clarify one point.
15:31 05-04-09 [573] Cold fusion This is much more accurate. There was no "long series of replication failures," and how could the consensus of 1989 be based on such? The text here contradicted the article.
15:06 05-04-09 [574] User talk:Abd Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: Thanks for the warning, Fut. Perf. It's actually helpful.
14:56 05-04-09 [575] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: clarify: JzG was not sufficiently involved as of December 7, 2007, to require admin recusal.
14:19 05-04-09 [576] User talk:Wfaxon On the fence about Cold fusion: new section
13:37 05-04-09 [577] User talk:Beetstra Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: point by point, about right here, right now.
04:28 05-04-09 [578] User:Abd/Lyrikline poets here I was all hot for this Portuguese Cutie, but it was just an Excel screw-up
04:25 05-04-09 [579] User:Abd/Lyrikline poets itals for done links
04:23 05-04-09 [580] User:Abd/Lyrikline poets itals for done links
04:22 05-04-09 [581] Mascha Kaléko External links: lyrikline.org) (top) [rollback]
04:18 05-04-09 [582] Ernst Jandl External links: add lyrikline.org link) (top) [rollback]
04:13 05-04-09 [583] Marie Luise Kaschnitz External links: lyrikline.org
04:08 05-04-09 [584] Michael Lentz expand reference text) (top) [rollback]
04:08 05-04-09 [585] Michael Lentz External links: not needed
04:06 05-04-09 [586] Michael Lentz cite reference
03:58 05-04-09 [587] Michael Lentz External link: lyrikline.org
03:51 05-04-09 [588] Paul Maar External links: actualy add link!
03:49 05-04-09 [589] Paul Maar External links: lyrikline.org
03:41 05-04-09 [590] User:Abd/Lyrikline poets add a standard link text
03:23 05-04-09 [591] User talk:Beetstra Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: clarify
03:22 05-04-09 [592] User talk:Beetstra Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: your choice, Dirk.
03:13 05-04-09 [593] User talk:Fritzpoll Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section
01:42 05-04-09 [594] User talk:66.253.210.220 Warning: Userpage vandalism on User:Fritzpoll. (TW)) (top
01:41 05-04-09 [595] User talk:Fritzpoll Reverted edits by 66.253.210.220 (talk) to last version by Tiamut
01:36 05-04-09 [596] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Prior RfC regarding JzG: separate present RfC summary from prior RfC, may have caused some confusion.
01:17 05-04-09 [597] User talk:LirazSiri Be calm, be patient: congratulations, LS
01:01 05-04-09 [598] User talk:Abd RFC JZG3: maybe it's something about limerick.
01:00 05-04-09 [599] User talk:Abd RFC JZG3: don't worry about it, Enric, but do be careful about how you present sources and for what purpose.
16:31 04-04-09 [600] User:Abd/Notices MfD for User:Abd/JzG: This notice is covered by a later one, remove.
16:30 04-04-09 [601] User:Abd/Notices Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new certification by Durova and Petri Krohn appeared.
16:13 04-04-09 [602] User talk:Durova A suggestion: support the initiative by SA and Durova.
16:05 04-04-09 [603] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Cold fusion publication decision: add note from later reading.
14:36 04-04-09 [604] User talk:Beetstra Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: add link
14:31 04-04-09 [605] User talk:Beetstra Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: well, that was unfortunate. Sorry.
05:51 04-04-09 [606] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Users certifying the basis for this dispute: I think this can come out now, okay, Spartaz?
05:44 04-04-09 [607] User talk:Abd RFC JZG3: No problem, Enric. Makes things clearer anyway. Nice try.
05:25 04-04-09 [608] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct JzG 3 now certified again. Thanks, Spartaz.
05:21 04-04-09 [609] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 View by Durova: endorse
05:20 04-04-09 [610] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by DGG: endorse
03:37 04-04-09 [611] User talk:Beetstra Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section
02:43 04-04-09 [612] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: date deletion of CMNS Talk page, this was not old.
02:39 04-04-09 [613] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: date archiving of Talk page
02:03 04-04-09 [614] User talk:Petri Krohn Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section
01:59 04-04-09 [615] User:Abd/Notices Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: certification withdrawn, RfC will be deleted if not certified.
01:57 04-04-09 [616] User talk:Durova Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section
01:48 04-04-09 [617] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Users certifying the basis for this dispute: Agree with Spartaz re restarting clock for cert.
01:35 04-04-09 [618] User talk:Enric Naval JzG RFC: you can withdraw certification, Enric, though it merely will increase wikidrama.
01:00 04-04-09 [619] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports (arbitrary break 2): something is happening and I don't know what it is, or do I, Mr. Jones?
20:26 03-04-09 [620] User talk:Abd RFC JZG3: 99.999% of Wikipedia editors do not agree with you. Is that the claim?
20:23 03-04-09 [621] User talk:Abd RFC JZG3: fix name
20:22 03-04-09 [622] User talk:Abd RFC JZG3: Thanks, Spartaz. Please be specific as to "crusade."
20:18 03-04-09 [623] User talk:Beetstra Your comment in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section
18:29 03-04-09 [624] User talk:Enric Naval JzG RFC: I was surprised, myself. Apparently, though, he considers there to be a real dispute here, regardless of "side."
18:08 03-04-09 [625] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Outside view by Coppertwig: Endorse
17:29 03-04-09 [626] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Prior RfC regarding JzG: Gentle reminders have not worked. Hopefully, my last edit to this RfC beyond possible endorsements.
17:01 03-04-09 [627] Talk:Cold fusion IP edit about: finish the section head!
17:00 03-04-09 [628] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports (arbitrary break 1): Science News is RS, but that doesn't mean that we drop common sense!
16:39 03-04-09 [629] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports (arbitrary break 1): please don't ask for the use of non-RS to source article text here. We have enough trouble wtih RS!
16:23 03-04-09 [630] Talk:Cold fusion IP edit about: more clear?
16:18 03-04-09 [631] Talk:Cold fusion IP edit about: new section
16:05 03-04-09 [632] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": a memoir of a notable person is usable no matter how much later it was written, if attributed.
14:28 03-04-09 [633] Talk:University of Atlanta UNVEILED: thanks, Mistro12.
04:20 03-04-09 [634] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: about the Petit article.
03:58 03-04-09 [635] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": Fleischmann's recollections, even though later, are usable.
03:38 03-04-09 [636] User:Abd/Notices /* Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3 filed.
03:21 03-04-09 [637] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 JzG long involved with Cold fusion: remove old snippet
03:19 03-04-09 [638] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct Approved pages (users): duh, you mean you put da bold outside o da brackets?
03:17 03-04-09 [639] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct add Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3
03:14 03-04-09 [640] User talk:JzG Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: new section
03:09 03-04-09 [641] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 timestamp
03:02 03-04-09 [642] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 moved User:Abd/JzG/RfC to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: file RfC
03:02 03-04-09 [643] User:Abd/JzG/RfC moved User:Abd/JzG/RfC to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: file RfC
03:01 03-04-09 [644] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 not a draft any more. a gale? or a breeze? or just dead air? we'll see.
03:00 03-04-09 [645] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Prior RfC regarding JzG: what happened to the first JzG RfC? not certified? What?
02:59 03-04-09 [646] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Community attempt: prior RfCs
02:51 03-04-09 [647] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Community attempt: copy edit
02:41 03-04-09 [648] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Applicable policies: ref Misuse of adminstrative tools policy
02:36 03-04-09 [649] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Desired outcome: ask for affirmation of action while involved.
02:33 03-04-09 [650] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Community attempt
02:31 03-04-09 [651] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Attempt by Abd: move RfAr section
02:30 03-04-09 [652] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Attempt by Abd: finish up
00:52 03-04-09 [653] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: clarify to make sure it's not misunderstood, these sections not written by the editors -- except mine.
00:46 03-04-09 [654] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: stuff stuff
00:39 03-04-09 [655] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: add some stuff. fix stuff.
00:04 03-04-09 [656] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: interesting set of sources, please read them carefully. Simon, not Shamoo.
22:55 02-04-09 [657] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": I wouldn't suggest covering both in the same article, there need to be two articles. But ...
22:35 02-04-09 [658] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: bold one principle
22:33 02-04-09 [659] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: how the guideline treats fringe. It is not the way fringe has been treated by many editors at Cold fusion.
21:34 02-04-09 [660] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: open secret. look again, Enric, please reread and reflect, it may help you.
16:29 02-04-09 [661] User:Synergy/Durova clarity
16:25 02-04-09 [662] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: respond re claims about outside editor communications.
15:49 02-04-09 [663] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: hmph! Okay, Verbal show me your editorial skill.
15:28 02-04-09 [664] Talk:Cold fusion one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: Dog bites man.
15:01 02-04-09 [665] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: address the issue specifically
14:49 02-04-09 [666] User talk:Abd User:Abd/Cold fusion controversy: fmt
14:46 02-04-09 [667] Talk:Cold fusion Variations on "pathological science": short collapse was not useful and contentious.
14:43 02-04-09 [668] User talk:Sarcasticidealist Glad you're gone: Yeah, the password could be quite useful.
14:42 02-04-09 [669] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: format
14:39 02-04-09 [670] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: respond to Enric.
14:09 02-04-09 [671] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: I'm proposing that we prefer peer-reviewed publication over other reliable sources, not that we exclude anything in reliable source.
13:12 02-04-09 [672] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: evidence for anomalous inertia in fingers from excessive editing of Wikipedia.
04:11 02-04-09 [673] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: extend ital
04:10 02-04-09 [674] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: fmt
04:08 02-04-09 [675] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: explicit
04:07 02-04-09 [676] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: 46 edits
04:04 02-04-09 [677] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Users certifying the basis for this dispute: two certs, will move to RfC space tomorrow. (need to stop now, want to make proper notification, etc.)
04:02 02-04-09 [678] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: okay, I think it's all here now.
03:49 02-04-09 [679] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 JzG long involved with Cold fusion: add 140 edits to Talk:Cold fusion
03:45 02-04-09 [680] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 JzG long involved with Cold fusion: add list of 64 edits to Cold fusion
03:40 02-04-09 [681] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 JzG long involved with Cold fusion: librarian
03:39 02-04-09 [682] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Statement of the dispute: stuff
03:35 02-04-09 [683] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: minor
03:19 02-04-09 [684] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: shorten wikilink display
03:14 02-04-09 [685] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Statement of the dispute: edit per suggestions
02:37 02-04-09 [686] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: fmt
02:34 02-04-09 [687] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: gude for the perplexed
02:00 02-04-09 [688] User talk:Abd User:Abd/Cold fusion controversy: yeah, interesting. Rothwell is a writer, sometimes it's tragic what Wikipedia does to writers. It's the old battle, writer vs. editor.
20:07 01-04-09 [689] Instant-runoff voting Usually allows one ballot to determine a majority winner: example of majority and monotonicity failure
19:48 01-04-09 [690] User talk:Abd User:Abd/JzG
18:36 01-04-09 [691] User talk:CambridgeBayWeather Your close of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abd/JzG: sign it
18:36 01-04-09 [692] User talk:CambridgeBayWeather Your close of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abd/JzG: About your deletion of the page.
18:25 01-04-09 [693] User:Abd/JzG fmt) (top) [rollback]
18:25 01-04-09 [694] User:Abd/JzG note re deletion of page.
18:19 01-04-09 [695] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 by Abd: add attempts to resolve by Petri Krohn and Durova.
16:15 01-04-09 [696] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: add AN/I discussion of abuse of admin powers.
15:59 01-04-09 [697] Mad scientist Undid revision 281096966 by Abd (talk)oops! random mouse click in the wrong place!
15:58 01-04-09 [698] Mad scientist Reverted 1 edit by JzG identified as vandalism to last revision by 65.242.170.253. (TW)
15:48 01-04-09 [699] User talk:Fritzpoll Request for userification of Cold fusion controversy: Thanks. Was there a Talk page attached?
15:46 01-04-09 [700] User talk:Abd User:Abd/Cold fusion controversy: Thanks.
15:42 01-04-09 [701] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: V is basically correct.
15:32 01-04-09 [702] User talk:Fritzpoll Request for userification of Cold fusion controversy: new section
13:32 01-04-09 [703] Talk:Rashad Khalifa Disposition of the "sexual misconduct" case.: new section
11:23 01-04-09 [704] Rashad Khalifa Criminal Charges: oops! fix reversal of meaning
11:21 01-04-09 [705] Rashad Khalifa Criminal Charges: get rid of conjunction 'however' since no contradiction.
11:20 01-04-09 [706] Rashad Khalifa Criminal Charges: English
04:33 01-04-09 [707] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": remove collapse. I'll refactor this tomorrow if I have time, friendly" and selective collapse welcome.
04:31 01-04-09 [708] Talk:Cold fusion CR-39 and positive and negative results.: remove inappropriate collapse of discussion with erroneous hatnote.
04:27 01-04-09 [709] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: remove half paren
04:26 01-04-09 [710] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: be careful Phil. You want comment, you might get it. Try WP:DR, it works. Change hatnote to neutral.
04:10 01-04-09 [711] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: fun. Got some book reports to write. So much reliable source, so little time.
03:58 01-04-09 [712] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: sorry for the unnecessary work, Enric. What made you think you needed to do that?
03:46 01-04-09 [713] User talk:Abd looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: I just hate it when people present conclusive evidence for the obvious as if it were a contradiction to what I've said, when it confirms it.