Template talk:WPVG icon
Appearance
{{WPVG icon direct}}
[edit]Isn't there some way to merge {{WPVG icon direct}} within this template? If the brackets are an issue, this template could just use the filename twice instead of relying on a subtemplate. Is there a benefit to keeping it separate and dealing with two different templates? czar 21:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- I made it separate because {{WikiProject Video games}} (and a few others) were using the bare image name rather than a "[[File:"-prefixed link; if there's an easy way to combine them I'm cool with it. The only other usage is for a few image links in portals that passing a "|link=" parameter which isn't correctly processed by this template, but that's an issue that's probably easy to fix. My knowledge of template syntax is limited, though. --PresN 21:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 1 May 2016
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please make the icon link to WP:VG, it is not CC-BY-SA, but CC-0 so you don't need to attribute to the file description page. Carl Fredik 💌 📧 21:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Carl Fredik 💌 📧 21:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Declined, it's not linking to anything- this template is literally just a shorthand for "[[File:WPVG_icon_2016.svg]]", so that if we change the image url it only has to be updated in one spot (it was a big pain tracking down everywhere we used the WPVG icon last time). --PresN 03:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- @PresN: That wikitext does link to something, specifically to File:WPVG icon 2016.svg (example: ). The request is to change the template to be shorthand for "[[File:WPVG_icon_2016.svg|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games]]" (example: ). In practice, you might want to make that
link={{{link|Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games}}}
in case someone has reason to override the target somewhere. - AFAIK there's no technical or legal reason not to do so since the current icon is CC0, so it's up to WP:VG if they want it that way. Note if in the future you use a CC BY-SA or other non-public-domain image, you'd probably have to remove that linking so as to allow the usual link to the file description page to comply with the terms of the non-PD license. Anomie⚔ 03:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, well, why not. Added. --PresN 03:46, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- @PresN: That wikitext does link to something, specifically to File:WPVG icon 2016.svg (example: ). The request is to change the template to be shorthand for "[[File:WPVG_icon_2016.svg|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games]]" (example: ). In practice, you might want to make that