Template talk:Taxonomy/Angiosperms

Template:Taxonomy/Angiosperms is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Template-protected edit request on 4 April 2015

This edit request to Template:Taxonomy/Gymnosperms has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

It seems the USDA (a very relied-upon source) has utterly RECLASSIFIED allium cepa. Request wikipedia correlate such information: DIVISION, CLASS, SUBCLASS, ORDER, AND FAMILY have all changed.

http://www.plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=ALCE

Rank Scientific Name and Common Name Kingdom Plantae – Plants Subkingdom Tracheobionta – Vascular plants Superdivision Spermatophyta – Seed plants Division Magnoliophyta – Flowering plants Class Liliopsida – Monocotyledons Subclass Liliidae Order Liliales Family Liliaceae – Lily family Genus Allium L. – onion Species Allium cepa L. – garden onion

76.120.86.101 (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: notification posted on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life - I'll leave further actions to more experienced content and taxobox editors to discuss. GermanJoe (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The USDA page referred to above is hopelessly out of date. USDA GRIN is correct: search for "Allium cepa" here. No change is required. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 17 September 2017

This edit request to Template:Taxonomy/Gymnosperms has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Clade would preferably be replaced by 'phylum' in Clade:Gymnosperms -> Phylum: Magnoliphhytaor Angiospermae Royal Society Biologist (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Royal Society Biologist: These may be desired to be kept as different entries, rather than one versus the other. I've disabled the editprotected request pending further input. Have pinged WP:TOL, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life#Clades versus or in addition to phyla, etc., in "Ancestral taxa" navboxes, to get said input; this might also affect Template:Taxobox, etc. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 11:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The feedback at WT:TOL is "For angiosperm classification, we follow the APG IV system which has near universal consensus among botanists. APG doesn't recognize any ranked taxa above orders, solely clades." So, there is definitely not consensus for the proposed change. If you think that consensus should shift, please take it up at WT:TOL. We can't be making random changes to specific templates; all Angiosperm templates with taxonomic information should be consistent, and if they're to change it should be done across-the-board, not piecemeal. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 18:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 7 April 2018

This edit request to Template:Taxonomy/Gymnosperm has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I request you to allow me to edit this page as it has wrong information. Hibiscus is a gymnosperm and not an angiosperm. Please see to it, and accept my request as soon as possible. Vatsal2507 (talk) 05:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This is not the right page to request additional user rights.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 11:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 31 May 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Angiosperms are a child of Spermatophyta, not a direct child of Plantae. Please change. <RetroCraft314 talk/> 03:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit template-protected}} template. You can get a consensus at WT:TOL that the change is correct per the classification system we use. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 14 July 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The correct scientific classification order for ALL plants, animals, and minerals in the entire universe, is: Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, then Species. In this listing you have the Class listed for all 3 of the Phylum, Class, and Order. This is a HUGE error, it's how we define our entire lives. I wonder how many other listings have missing or incorrect classification categories?? 67.189.113.30 (talk) 23:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done please include a "complete and specific description of the request" or just mark up your change in the sandbox first - then reactivate your edit request. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dicotyledon Is not the same

The taxonomy they use in Dicotyledon isn’t Dicotyledon taxonomy it’s of all flowering plants. Evan though Dicotyledon isn’t all of the flowering plants because of monocots. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlas Þə Biologist:, dicots aren't recognized in recent classifications of plants. Monocots evolved from dicots (as they were traditionally defined), but the "dicot" lineages that diverged before monocots arose are rather atypical of most dicots. Magnolias and water lilies have a large number of petals, not 4 or 5 as is typical of dicots. Typical dicots are now classified as eudicots, and the earlier diverging lineages are now placed in other groups such as magnoliids. Plantdrew (talk) 01:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]