Template:Taxonomy/Amphibia is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Template:Taxonomy/Amphibia is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
No, I think that was just my mistake. I forgot that the automatic taxoboxes won't display intermediates above the first formal unit. I was fearing an overly detailed taxobox. No, go ahead and add Tetrapoda! Petter Bøckman (talk) 08:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay. I figured this was something to do with that and was prepared to compromise. Actually, a week ago, that would have posed a serious problem, but Martin's updated the code now to handle 51 layers now instead of 12. I'll restore the Tetrapoda as the parent here. Lissamphibia...what was I thinking?Bob the Wikipedian(talk • contribs) 03:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
