Template talk:Routemap/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Centring maps

@Sameboat: Can a way to centre maps using the CSS margin: auto; (without any label text on either side) be added to the module (or does one exist in the module already)? I'm not exactly very good at Lua coding, so I wouldn't really try to add something like that myself. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 06:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done. Tested in module:Routemap/sandbox and {{Routemap/sandbox}}. Also fixed the issue which inline usage must begin with &#32 ; before the routemap template. Changes not yet applied on formal module. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 08:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

@Sameboat: Can you add a parameter that makes the maps centred (for non-inline maps)? Sorry if my initial request wasn't very clear. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 03:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@Jc86035: I would rather make it always align to center regardless of inline, this makes things much simpler. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 04:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

background color and {{BSsplit}}

The |bg= parameter does not load well with {{BSsplit}}. When I safe subst {{BS}} templates on Template:IRT Eastern Parkway Line, I got empty space instead of background color, and the BS split was also removed when I tried to put that in simultaneously. I put bg-color in, but this happened because the bg-color wouldn't render on the same line as the bs-split. Is there a way to fix this? epic genius (talk) 02:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Multiple diagrams

map1 asdasdasdasdasd

map2 qweqweqweqweqwe

@Sameboat: Is it possible to have multiple diagrams in the same template, like with {{BS-map}}? Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 08:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

I thought about it before, but my conclusion is that it's not worth to complicate the Lua code when this can be easily done by stacking the routemap templates in the same table. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 09:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Conversion function

@Sameboat: Can you make the conversion function substitute Template:BS[-2]n/safesubst instead if the pages exist? (See the bottom of WT:RDT.) Thanks, Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 11:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

This is very easy[1], it's just that {{BS1/safesubst}} caught me off-guard because I thought it would be {{BS/safesubst}} and BSn-2/safesubst don't seem ready yet. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 11:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

@Sameboat: Thanks. I've moved {{BS1/safesubst}} to {{BS/safesubst}}, because it is supposed to be a subpage of {{BS}}. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 15:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

PS I meant that because Pldx1 didn't make /safesubst for some of the templates (and removed the substitution function from some of the actual BSn and BSn-2 templates) it wouldn't work without checking if the subpage exists. I would use his scripts (on WT:RDT, as you probably saw) to make the subpages, but I don't know how to run the scripts. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 15:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent changes generating errors

The recent changes seem to be breaking some templates, such as Template:Adirondack Scenic Railroad and so dozens of pages they are used in. I don’t have a list of templates, it’s all the articles listed here, which are the articles in this category, which are almost all railways.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@JohnBlackburne: Fixed. (The articles using {{BSto}} and {{BSsrws}} with only one of the lines of text should now be contained in this tracking category.) Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding convert and spacing

I have recently seen that on the various Routemaps I have edited and added the parameter convert, I have seen that the icons have become spaced out and now create horrible looking maps, such as here Template:Channel Tunnel Rail Link. Please could this be addressed so all maps with this parameter are fixed? Nathan A RF (talk) 18:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@Nathan A RF: That was my mistake; it should now be fixed (the module now checks if a line has a <br/> tag inside). Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 04:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Additionally, you may want to use {{BScvt}} instead, as it avoids having to use {{Convert}} as well as {{BSsplit}}. ("Convert" is not a parameter; it's a separate template to the RDT series.) Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 04:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

I know about {{BScvt}} and I update Routemaps with that referring to tunnel and bridge distances in yards, however I do use {{Convert}} as it shows miles and chains, widely used by British railways, rather than 0.93 miles for example, which is not used in the UK. {{BSsplit}} is used for other things in my opinion, but I will continue to use {{Convert}} for miles and chains. Nathan A RF (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

@Nathan A RF: I've added conversion functionality for miles and chains to BScvt (example: {{BScvt|56; 13|in=mi; ch}} →

56 mi 13 ch

90.38 km

). Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 08:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Errors

Jc86035, the recent change seems to added hundreds of articles to Category:Pages with script errors, at least two different errors (line 740, line 791) in my limited checking.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 14:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

@JohnBlackburne: Y Should be fixed now. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 14:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Seems to have fixed it - I checked half a dozen articles in the category and they were OK, or OK after purging. The number in the category has already reduced by ~50, but it may take some time for it to return to normal with no articles.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Collapsible replacement row background

@Sameboat: I still don't really know how this thing works. I'm trying to give the table cells which hold the collapsible replacement text cells the CSS width:100%;, but I'm not sure where this actually is in the module. (This would fix {{GZM RDT/5}}, as "Proposed extension" is wider than "Huangniubu".) Could you help with this if you have time? Thanks, Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 13:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

I didn't actually take time to analyze YLSS's code but did a quick style value backtracking in Firefox page inspector for "vertical-align:middle;padding-left:3px;font-size:90" and ended up at "row-collapsible-right-button-fmt". Please test in testcase if my edit to sandbox works. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 16:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

@Sameboat: I was trying to solve something else, although that does help. I've tried editing the sandbox, but I don't really know how q.text_width is handled and it's not working. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 05:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Inline vs. Not

Is there any way to get a map set in its own template with inline for use in an infobox to display properly outside of an infobox without altering the code in the template? Lost on  Belmont ^3200N_1000W  (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Add |inline={{#if:{{{inline|}}}|1}} to the diagram; and use {{SomeMap RDT|inline=1}} when transcluding into an Infobox (otherwise just the normal {{SomeMap RDT}} format). Useddenim (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

A little question

What is the template of {{#invoke:Routemap|BSsplit}}*angys* (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

@*angys*: The template containing the above code is Template:BSsplit; the module is Module:Routemap. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 15:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Parameter collapsible?

I can't seem to be able to use the parameter collapsible in my routemap properly, and there is no example in the Template data section. I tried with collapsible=yes and collapsible=on but I still can't make my routemap to be collapsed in the article by telling it to collapse=yes. How should I use collapsible? --Matija (talk) 13:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

@Matija: If you're using the template in an infobox, it should have the parameter |inline=yes. I've made the infobox's table cell collapsed. |collapse=yes should work properly. The template is collapsible by default, so you don't need to add |collapsible=yes. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Thanks for fixing it in the infobox. However, I'd also like to use it in EuroVelo where I'd like it to also be collapsed by default, but with the frame and all (and not inline). Any advice? --Matija (talk) 08:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@Matija: Try using |inline={{#if:{{{inline|}}}|yes}} (along with |collapsed=yes) in the template. Then in the infobox you could use {{EuroVelo 6|inline=yes}}. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 08:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Well, it works now, thanks! Funny, when I first did it like this, the template appeared to be all inline (that's why I reverted the edit). I don't know how to explain that but the important thing is - it now works :) --Matija (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Text sidebar formatting

row 1 row 2 div right row 3 div right row 4 row 5 row 6 small text right cell row 7 row 8 (floated to left) small text div right

@Sameboat: Would it be possible to change the text sidebars, so that the text for the leftmost/rightmost two cells is contained in divs instead of table cells, without messing up collapsible sections? (This is primarily to make diagrams narrower; it used to work with a hack using {{right}} in diagrams such as {{4 (New York City Subway service)}} but now doesn't for some reason. I tried manually adding float tags for Bowling Green station in that diagram.) Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 09:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

The issue is largely due to div float has a tendency to induce line break when there is non-div object by its side... -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 11:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

@Sameboat: It seems to be solved if both the left side and the right side are divs with CSS float:[left/right];line-height:1.44 (with possible margins in the middle). I don't know how the code for |tw= and collapsible rows would be modified if this were to be added, though, or if the 6-value |tw= would still work afterwards. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 05:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Could someone help fix up a new routemap?

I recently created the Lysekil Line article, based loosely on the original in the Swedish Wikipedia. As part of that I copied the map found in that article's infobox and used it to create a routemap here.

However, it seems as if there are still some problems getting it to look right, and fixing them is beyond my capabilities (I suspect that some of the here-deprecated versions are still supported over there). Would someone with those capabiities be so kind as to take a look at it and fix them? I'd appreciate it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Typo

Should fix typo in module. default = '[[Cat1egory:Pages with errors of Module Routemap]]' should be

default = '[[Category:Pages with errors of Module Routemap]]'

Rowan03 (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

@Rowan03: Thanks, fixed. Jc86035 (talk) 04:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 23 September 2017

I wish to acess the template editing page so I can translate this template to my language, we still use the old BS-map template and I'm trying to modernize a bit of the portuguese wikipedia. Thank you. Ligaanet (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Click on "View Source" to take a copy. Cabayi (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Doesn't work because i don't have the right permissions: This page is currently protected so that only template editors and administrators can edit it. Is there a way i could get granted acess to it? Or maybe someone that has acess could simply copy it and send it to me? I don't know whats the actual "right way" to translate a template that is as important as that one. Thanks Ligaanet (talk) 05:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

The source is below the protection message. The relevant part is {{#invoke:Routemap|infobox}}. See Module:Routemap. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Ligaanet, I tried it while logged out before I replied. You don't need permissions to "View Source".

It should be possible to import the template & module directly to pt:. However, a glance at pt:Wikipédia:Usuários shows the import permission isn't granted to PT admins as part of their permissions package, and the list of users with the import permission is empty, so I'm not sure who would be able to help you. WP:Importers explains. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 08:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

I was able to bring it to the pt wiki, i asked for help from my side to gradually translate everything but the pt wiki bosses are unfortunately known for being a lil hostile. I simple made a few pages with the right templates and i hope they won't end up deleted because of some weird rule (believe it or not but the huge, days long work, i did across the Lisbon Metro pages - did the same at ptwiki and enwiki, just translated it from one another - got deleted from the ptwiki because for some reason we can't put the connected bus lines and all that because: "we ain't a travel agency" true moderator reply). Thanks for all your help here!Ligaanet (talk) 08:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

pass parameter to make collapsed outside infobox?

So at Transportation in Vancouver § Public transportation, I'm trying to get {{TransLink Major Route Diagram}} (which is not in an infobox) to start collapsed (because it's honking and dominates the page)... but only on that page. So I don't want to use |collapsed=<includeonly>yes</includeonly> in the template itself because that would make the template collapsed by default wherever it's included. I can't seem to figure out what parameter to pass to the call to {{TransLink Major Route Diagram}} to make that happen—what am I missing? Is it not possible without making "collapsed" the default state for all inclusions? —Joeyconnick (talk) 09:19, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

@Joeyconnick: Done; a |collapse= can now be passed to the template (any value enables collapsing on load). Jc86035 (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Oh cool... thanks! 👍 I'm still learning about templates and coding them, so I really appreciate the help! One more question... the second map (the "Legend") has this set: |map2-collapse=yes and I assume the intent (which I agree with) is for that part of the diagram to always start collapsed. But it doesn't. I can't find any documentation at {{Routemap}} that specifies adding multiple maps in one call to the template using |mapX...=... is it a case of the template failing as gracefully as it can but not quite working as I assume the original editors of the TransLink diagram intended? Or is it an incompatibility between what {{BS-map}} was able to do and what {{Routemap}} can, given this template used to be at: {{TransLink Major Route Diagram (pre-Evergreen with 97 B-Line)}} (long story as to why it was forked). —Joeyconnick (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

​ My error; I've fixed this (previously only map2-collapsed worked and not map2-collapse). There are a number of things which I should probably add to the documentation but haven't. Jc86035 (talk) 04:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Cool... thanks again! —Joeyconnick (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Possible bug

Link doesn't work, but at least the following code works properly STR!~uSTRq!~ACC!@Example Link still doesn't work, and now the code is messed up File:BSicon uSTRq!@Example.svg STR!~uSTRq!~ACC!@Example Link works STR!~uSTRq!@Example

I noticed that when I try to link an icon that has more than one overlay, the link doesn't work (as shown in the box). How can this be fixed? epicgenius (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: It looks like no one ever added the functionality for this (Sameboat and YLSS wrote this part of code, I think). I don't know if I have time to add it, or to clean up the icon parameter coding, but maybe someone at WT:Lua could help. Jc86035 (talk) 07:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Didn't discover this bug back then, but I really isn't capable of fixing it now. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 09:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

I posted at WT:LUA. Maybe someone can help me there. epicgenius (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

I just noted at WT:Lua#Linking to icons in Template:Routemap that I put a fix in Module:Routemap. Some articles should be purged and carefully checked. Johnuniq (talk) 01:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 18 March 2018

Test
Test

@Jc86035: Please modify local function base so that:

1. There is a parameter to override the default text colour;
2. |bg= will automatically pass the same value to {{{bg1}}} and {{{bg2}}}.

Thank you. Useddenim (talk) 11:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Jc86035 hasn't edited for a few weeks. Is there a reason why you need him/her in particular? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: No response and Jc86035 is currently inactive — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

@MSGJ: I pinged Jc86035 because he's been maintaining this template. I'd do it myself, except that I don't code Lua. Useddenim (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Me neither! Which means this request is not ready to be made. So I'll leave it marked as answered until you have found someone to code it. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim and MSGJ: For the text colour, I think it'd be easiest to just use |style=color: colour, since this is not really something that a lot of diagrams will need. I don't think changing the behaviour of |bg= is a good idea, since currently all |...1= parameters have aliases without 1 (e.g. |map1-collapsible= = |map-collapsible=). Just use all the parameters, or use |style=background: colour to change the background of the whole container table. Jc86035 (talk) 07:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

@Jc86035: |style=background: works (although without the elegance of {{{bg1}}} and {{{bg2}}}, because the padding has to be added manually); |style=color: doesn't. Useddenim (talk) 10:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim: It works for me (see diagram above); is there a part of the diagram table where it fails? (I'm ignoring the header text since if it were changed as well there might be contrast issues without a different colour for the header being explicitly specified.) Jc86035 (talk) 05:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Not sure where we are with this or what the parameter even does but it appears clear it needs to be coded first, then a request can be done if needed, so marked as answered. Can request slave labour help at Wikipedia_talk:Lua Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Disable tooltip

Is it possible to disable all tooltip? Arieschen62 (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

@Arieschen62: Not right now. Do you need this for something (e.g. do the tooltips contravene project guidelines)? Jc86035 (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Highlight

Example 1 Example 2

Is there a way to highlight only the individual cells, rather than the entire row, as shown in Example 2?

Or for that matter, format the text in individual cells, rather than the entire row? epicgenius (talk) 23:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Currently STR!_bg=#abcdef or tSTR2__bg=#abcdef!~uSTRq. I would like to make STR__bg=#abcdef possible and eliminate !_, but for now the first two should work. Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The other icon parameters are listed in the template documentation. Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Text size

@RexxS: Sorry; I didn't realize which part of the code you were editing. I think it would be better to fix it in a way which doesn't break the table, for example by allowing the sidebar table cells to have rowspan (and then manually fixing a lot of diagrams). Jc86035 (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

I've just dropped you a note on your talk page. Please compare Template:Wherry Lines with Template:Wherry Lines/sandbox. I can't see any broken tables there, but if you have examples of where there are problems, please let me know and I'll do my best to fix them. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 10:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

As noted, I would like to make the template compliant with the guideline while avoiding gaps between images. Because of the way that rows are generated it would be a bit difficult to allow for rowspan, but it would probably be the best option. Jc86035 (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at User talk:Jc86035

I'm afraid you're mistaken about my change to Module:Routemap/sandbox. It does do something, so I've reverted you because you made the text non-complaint again. MOS:FONTSIZE is not negotiable. If you think the edit did nothing, please compare Template:Wherry Lines with Template:Wherry Lines/sandbox. I think you'll find the difference striking. As far as I can see, there is no problem with line heights in that template, although the first line in BSto could be rendered slightly smaller if problems occur. Just reduce the '105%' in line 1100. --RexxS (talk) 10:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: Sorry about that (I've replied at the template talk page). It would be visually disruptive to introduce gaps between the rows of images. Try looking at the template in the mobile skin. I do remember spending quite a while to make the template function properly and not look terrible in Minerva. Jc86035 (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

I can see what you mean by looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wherry_Lines?useskin=minerva and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wherry_Lines/sandbox?useskin=minerva – Minerva uses a larger font (16px default) which makes it difficult to get three lines of text into 20px height. My inclination would be to simply use bigger images (around 23px should do it), but it might be possible to squeeze the three lines in if all three lines are at 85%. I'll make a test and see. --RexxS (talk) 10:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

My last changes decreased the overall fontsize to 95% of page fontsize, then increased the smallest font up to 85% of page fontsize. Unfortunately that left both lines of BSto at the same font size. The Minerva skin still has a gap in the images at the ante-penultimate row. I don't think it's possible to get two rows of text using the Minerva skin into a height of 20px. I'll have a look at the images then. --RexxS (talk) 11:28, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: Oh, and it should also work in {{BS-map}} and {{BS-table}} diagrams, both of which are a bit broken, have different CSS and don't display correctly in Minerva at all. Also the PDF renderer.

I think it would be better to wait until any of the following happen: (a) TemplateStyles is enabled; (b) the other two diagram types are replaced entirely, which probably won't happen in a while; (c) someone figures out how to cleanly add rowspan to Module:Routemap table cells. Jc86035 (talk) 11:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, in the meantime, if it's a choice between accessibility and aesthetics, then accessibility really has to take precedence. I'll ping @Redrose64: into this discussion, as he was the one who started me down this particular rabbit-hole. --RexxS (talk) 11:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: I'd always assumed that RDTs remained this way because it would be prohibitively difficult to make them usefully accessible to those with poor vision in any way. For example, the icons are currently displayed in triple-nested tables (one for each row, one for each diagram, one for each Routemap/BS-map) and overlaid above each other with position:absolute divs, and have no alt text, which means screen readers are completely out of the picture. I'm probably the only Lua-competent user around (Sameboat doesn't edit much any more), and I haven't had the time to write a module to generate alt text like {{BS-alt}} used to. There are almost 100,000 icons, so obviously the BS-alt switch parser function became impractical a while ago. The colors are also fairly difficult to distinguish: open and closed line colours (e.g. #BE2D2C and #D77F7E) have a 2.0 contrast ratio (test others). Right now, I still don't think making some of the text bigger is going to help in a particularly meaningful way, especially since the majority of the text is compliant with the guideline. Jc86035 (talk) 13:22, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

If something performs badly with a screen-reader, I don't accept that as a reason why it should also perform badly for all people with impaired vision. The discussions on text size at MOS were quite conclusive about the necessity to have a minimum acceptable size. That has nothing to do with screen readers and the problems of alt text. It's important to realise that poor colour contrast is improved by scaling up, so whatever contrast problems exist with 20px images can only be alleviated, not worsened, by moving to a larger image. --RexxS (talk) 13:53, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Images

@Jc86035 and Redrose64: An experiment with font-size and line-height leads me to this:

	First line of text Second line of text
	First line of text Second line of text
	First line of text Second line of text

Because Minerva has a default font size of 16px, the minimum allowable fontsize is therefore 85% of 16px = 13.6px. Any line-height greater than 0.8 breaks the line in the table, so that's the best we can do if we want to preserve both the line continuity and comply with MOS:FONTSIZE. The question then is does that text look acceptable, or do we need more line height? If so, then the size of the images will have to be increased to keep the lines continuous. Once that decision is made, then we can look at sorting out the module and templates. Thoughts? --RexxS (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: I think for now the font size should be made larger if only one of the table cells contains text. A lot of BSicons have been drawn specifically so that they don't look pixelated at 20px height (i.e. most rectangular objects adhere to a 20-by-20 grid), so it would be somewhat annoying if we had to switch to e.g. 30px as everything would look very blurry on low-pixel-density screens. Jc86035 (talk) 13:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jc86035: I'm not sure I understand you. We can't have font sizes less than 13.6px in Minerva because of MOS:FONTSIZE. There's clearly no problem when fitting just one line of text in to a 20px height, but keeping double lines of text at less than 85% of the page font size simply isn't an option. I can't understand why you think pixelation of larger images would happen because, as far as I can see, all of the BS icons available at c:BSicon/Catalogue are svg images, which scale up without pixelating. --RexxS (talk) 13:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: With the images rendered as PNGs, it does affect the display to some degree if objects don't correspond to pixels (especially at this resolution).

For higher-resolution displays 30px would be perfectly fine, but a lot of diagrams are currently drawn to be as narrow as possible to fit inside infoboxes and/or not clutter up the page (which is probably why {{BSsplit}} exists in the first place). I've also seen manually inserted divs just to fit more content in narrower spaces, such as the interchange icons for King's Cross St. Pancras in this old version of Template:Victoria Line RDT. Jc86035 (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Precisely. Useddenim (talk) 06:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The software eventually renders the images as PNGs, but does its best to scale the SVGs up cleanly. SVG images that render well at 20px rarely render worse at 30px and I don't agree that we have to make special allowances for very low resolution displays; readers will expect them not to perform as well as high-res ones. Here are a couple of icons at 20px / 30px:

• —
• —

Do you know of a device that shows the second row worse than the first? It's a mistake to cram so much information into a box that it is unreadable, so if we are to have these sort of routemaps, then we have to have them large enough to read. --RexxS (talk) 13:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

See East Coast Main Line diagram for why a 50% in icon size is a bad idea. Useddenim (talk) 06:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: I've tried using 28px in the module sandbox (the row height has to be a multiple of 4, because MediaWiki rounds image widths to the nearest integer and some icons have 1:4, 1:2, 3:4, 5:4, 3:2 and 7:4 aspect ratios). It doesn't look bad except for the text now being disproportionately small, but issues will definitely probably come up with parameter values which are in pixels, and maybe other things. (The module already converts |tw= values to ems from pixels; this will need to be fixed since it's basically another hack to make it not break in Minerva.)

There will also probably be people who hate the change. Jc86035 (talk) 14:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Looking at Template:Wherry Lines/sandbox and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wherry_Lines/sandbox?useskin=minerva I must say I like them a lot. Everything is clearer for me; I especially find the text more obviously associated with the corresponding feature in the image. I think that basing it on 24px would be just about usable, but all of the text would need to be almost the same size, so it's less ideal. It needs testing in some real templates to see what problems (if any) will arise. You're right, of course, that the biggest obstacle will be folks who dislike any change, but you've done all you can to satisfy MOS:FONTSIZE, so you can be proud of your efforts. --RexxS (talk) 16:22, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: What's wrong with using a browser's (device's) zoom function to examine smaller text? One has to do that anyways to see fine detail in images on mobile devices. Useddenim (talk) 06:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim: For your comment about the ECML diagram, I actually used it as a test. The original was already quite long, but the test diagram taking up more space isn't necessarily a bad thing. (Even with the current templates and text sizes, a lot of diagrams don't really fit into the space in infoboxes.) A lot of people might not know that they can zoom in, especially on desktop browsers.

Changing to 24px might also allow some more flexibility in rendering diagonal parallel lines, since they are currently spaced at intervals of 1⁄3 along the icon edge. I don't know what 24px will look like, though. Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 09:21, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

OK, I took a look at your test, and 30px icons have lines that are too thick, and the whole thing looks unbalanced vis-a-vis lines to text to white space. @Tuvalkin:? Useddenim (talk) 15:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Compared with Template:East Coast Main Line diagram it has exactly the same balance vis-a-vis lines to white space. The text is less cramped in the sandbox version, of course, as the 28px image version has more room for the double text lines (like "Waverley Route" | to "Brunstane"), but the sparsity of text in the leftmost column is identical in both cases. --RexxS (talk) 18:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim: In theory, we can say that both our BS icons (SVG files) and type (TTF, OTF) have a vectorial basis, and therefore this can all be scaled limitlessly (long time ago I tried to implement a zoom function in RDTs, by the way). In practice, and in my humble opinion, here expressed solely because I was pinged, MOS is crap. Tuvalkin (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim: Older folk and those who are visually impaired are only able to comfortably read a relatively smaller range of text sizes. So they will have already set resolution and browser zoom to whatever is most comfortable for them. It is disconcerting to have to keep on changing from one zoom to another just to be able to read some tiny text. When you restore your previous zoom to go back to reading normal text, you will often have lost your place in the article. Simply put, having text below about 85% of what is "normal" size will make the experience much less comfortable for a significant sector of our readership. --RexxS (talk) 09:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

OK then; first an explanation on why I have been quiet. As I remarked to RexxS more than a week ago (and demonstrated using a SMS text from my manager that conveniently arrived whilst we were talking), I'm working pretty much full time these days (week ending 27 May I clocked 45 hours) and have a serious watchlist backlog. Tomorrow (29 May) is my first free day since that SMS.

Now to what started this: it was my request to RexxS here. Put simply: I cannot read the two-line text in Template:Wherry Lines (except in one instance: Haddiscoe Junction). My eyesight is not brilliant: but I defy anybody to state that all of the two-line text is perfectly readable at normal zoom in MonoBook skin. Since this is an accessibility issue, it must be fixed - we have no choice in the matter. WCAG is not something that you can opt out of.

We need to increase the font size. Period. This causes other issues and for me the simplest next step is to eliminate two-line text and put it all on one line. This will of course increase the width of the RDT; but that in turn suggests that we should ask "do we really need all this text?" Originally, RDTs had station names and little else, we didn't dress them up unnecessarily. So let's cut the crap. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

As regards the idea for increasing the icon size: Dutch Wikipedia use 30px, see for example nl:Spoorlijn Amsterdam - Rotterdam, and their two-line text is perfectly readable. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@Redrose64: You're right; you are ranting. Also, your accusation of 'refactoring of somebody else's post' completely removes the context of my comment. And we really don't need a note from your boss excusing you from editing on Wikipedia; you're a responsible adult who can make his own decisions about what to do with your time. Good Night. Useddenim (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

This edit was in direct violation of WP:TPO which says "you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving your own replies to individual points".

Is it really wrong for me to explain my silence? Other people take wikibreaks for various reasons, many of them say why that is. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@RexxS: The template which I mentioned last Sunday is Template:BSpx and its purpose was two-fold: there was no need to hard-code image sizes into any of the RDT templates, and it allowed other Wikipedias to set their own sizes, compare nl:Sjabloon:SP-Iconbreedte. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:59, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@Redrose64 and Useddenim: I think increasing the image size in Routemap and BSpx to 24px or 28px, and then changing BSsplit etc. to use div/br tags and larger text, might be better than instantly eliminating the split rows entirely. Otherwise things like labels for objects split between two rows and multiple objects in the same row (e.g.  (WBRÜCKE1-WBRÜCKE1)) might be broken. (Currently it is a bit difficult to change image size in {{Routemap}}. I or some other Lua-competent editor will have to fix that at some point.) Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 11:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Also, there are text cells and images of text which we might want to make larger. (In making Routemap's text cells I tried to squeeze the font so a digit would fit onto the grey part of  (cBS-), so the font size is half of the icon height and the characters are transformed to be 10% narrower than usual. This size is still larger than that of the characters in the images, which currently have an effective font size of about 8px.) If the font size of the text cells is kept at 50% of the height, then 28px icon height would be necessary to comply with MOS:FONTSIZE in Minerva (13.6) and Timeless (12.92), although for 24px we could ignore those skins because they aren't mentioned in the guideline change the line height and horizontal scaling of the text. Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Using this template in another Wiki

I've done many edits using this template and find it very useful. I also edit Wikipedia in other languages and would like to use it there as well.

How can I use this template in another language? Is there a way to copy it?

Thanks

--Chocom (talk) 08:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Useddenim (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Chocom: Assuming you only want to add this to WMF wikis, you will need to import (ask an admin on your wiki) Module:Routemap and Template:Routemap at a minimum, although you will also need Module:Color contrast, Module:Navbar and Module:Arguments if they do not already exist. Importing is restricted on most wikis so you will want to ask an administrator to help you, although sometimes I just copy and paste the pages and link to the original page/revision in the edit summary text (as you should do when updating a page based on another wiki's version). You will probably want to import and translate the documentation pages but it is not strictly necessary. The Routemap module itself also has some text strings (in the i18n table at the top) like the "Legend" text which you should translate. (You don't need to translate the text after double hyphens, because those are hidden comments and should remain in English.) The other templates which rely on the module are listed in the module documentation, but you don't need to import them. There are also several templates in Template:Routemap/doc which other wikis probably don't have all of, and you might want to import those as well. Jc86035 (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Followed your advice and it looks like it's working nicely. Thanks! I still need to translate lots of the documentation and the legends, but that is a WIP. One thing I'm still stuck on, the V T E links at the top of the infobox, where are they defined? In my version the row is "deformed" (broken onto 3 rows, the brackets being one row above and below the letters) and I would also like to change them to the correct letters for this language. Any ideas? --Chocom (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

The v-t-e links are defined by the |navbar= parameter. This should normally be set to the pagename of the template - for example, in Template:Bakerloo line RDT we have |navbar=Bakerloo line RDT. If such a template is subsequently moved, the |navbar= param must be updated to suit, like this. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

@Redrose64: I don't think Chocom was asking about that. If you want to change how the navbar template looks you should probably edit Module:Navbar on the Hebrew Wikipedia. It has displayed badly for me on some browsers in the past; it's probably either an issue with the module not being updated (to match the English Wikipedia version) or an issue related to the switch from HTML Tidy to RemexHtml.

If you've run into issues with the right-to-left text, it's probably fairly complicated to change the template to a natural sort of order but you could try adding text direction attributes and see what happens. There's a Routemap on arwiki, I think, but it doesn't seem to have been modified. Jc86035 (talk) 11:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

@Redrose64:Thanks for the info. @Jc86035: It looks a bit more complicated than I want to deal with right now. For the moment I just removed the navbar parameter so it's not showing. Just wanted to say thanks for the help and support! On the Hebrew Wikipedia I've so far only received negative comments, they're discussing deletion of the work I've been doing in this area, based mainly on the fact that I don't have 1000s of posts like they do. Needless to say, I prefer editing here. --Chocom (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 28 July 2018

Please, add after line 133 a new line deepsky = '00BFFF', ex_deepsky = '7FDFFF', Костякин Филипп (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

@Костякин Филипп: I'll do so in Module:Routemap. Jc86035 (talk) 10:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Multiple collapsible sections

I am trying to rewrite Template:Bridgewater Canal map, currently a BS map, as a Routemap. One of the problems with the existing version is that when you expand the collapsed sections, the alignment goes to pot.

I have a version at User:Murgatroyd49/sandbox2 that works for three out of the five collapsible sections. Currently the 2nd and third sections have the <collapsible> mark-up commented out and it works, if I uncomment either of those sections, the whole thing breaks again. What am I doing wrong? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

All of the sections (both collapsible and at least one segment of the main) must be exactly the same number of icons wide. It's been fixed. Useddenim (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks very much, I thought it was something simple! Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 22 March 2019

Please remove the line <noinclude>{{pp-protected|reason=1500+ transclusions|small=yes}}</noinclude>, since it is handled automatically by the documentation page.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Link to template

Hi! I'm wondering whether it is possible to link icons using !@ to templates like {{stl}}. --WMSR (talk) 03:10, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

@WMSR: I think it's technically possible if you pass the {{stl}} output through Module:Redirect, but I don't think you should bother. There are actually only 66 diagrams (out of several thousand) that use the !@ function in the first place. It'd be possible to modify Module:Adjacent stations to allow {{stl}} to output just the page title, but someone would need to write the code for that to happen. Jc86035 (talk) 16:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Misalignment for dual text sidebar collapsible

For me, the second example in section Dual text sidebar collapsible is misaligned. Here's a copy of it:

{{Routemap |map-title=Example 6.2: Only main text cell applied |style=width:380px |text-width=,120,,,120, |map= -startCollapsible commuter terminus! !uKBHFa\\KBHFa~~regional terminus River Boris! !uhKRZWae\WASSERq\hKRZWae~~bridge -endCollapsible station! !uINT\LDER\LSTR commuter terminus! !uKBHFe\\KBHFe~~regional terminus }}

Example 6.2: Only main text cell applied commuter terminus regional terminus River Boris bridge station commuter terminus regional terminus

For me, the top "commuter terminus" (when collapsed) and "River Boris" (when expanded) is a couple of pixels to the right compared to "station" and the bottom "commuter". If "commuter terminus" is replaced with shorter text, the top part is misaligned to the left, but only in collapsed state:

{{Routemap |map-title=Example 6.2: Only main text cell applied |style=width:380px |text-width=,120,,,120, |map= -startCollapsible first terminus! !uKBHFa\\KBHFa~~regional terminus River Boris! !uhKRZWae\WASSERq\hKRZWae~~bridge -endCollapsible station! !uINT\LDER\LSTR second terminus! !uKBHFe\\KBHFe~~regional terminus }}

Example 6.2: Only main text cell applied first terminus regional terminus River Boris bridge station second terminus regional terminus

Version with shorter text is aligned properly in expanded state. Checked in Firefox browser. Issue is present on all zoom levels between 100% and 200% for the first example, and on 100%–190% on the second example. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Appears all right in Safari. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:41, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

My first test was on Firefox in Kubuntu. Firefox on Windows look more or less OK (only saw one issue on 90% zoom). Chrome on Windows looks fine on all zoom levels—it seems to employ a different strategy to zooming compared to Firefox. Will try to check on newer version of Firefox in Kubuntu later. —⁠andrybak (talk) 10:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

@Andrybak: This is partially dependent on your browser's default fonts, because some fonts are wider than others. If your browser uses Helvetica, Arial, San Francisco, Roboto or Liberation Sans as the default sans-serif font, then the table should be wide enough (assuming the CSS works properly). However, if your browser uses Verdana or Bitstream Vera as the default sans-serif font, then it's possible that some diagrams will not be wide enough simply because >99% of users don't have this configuration and no one noticed.

You can usually fix this by changing |text-width= until the table cells are wide enough. However, I think it would be inadvisable to test this with any font wider than Bitstream Vera, since there's always going to be some other typeface that has wider characters, and the (fragile and slightly invalid) collapsible table structure necessitates fixed column widths. Jc86035 (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Add DejaVu Sans to the list of bad fonts. Switching to Liberation Sans fixed the issue in Firefox in Kubuntu. Jc86035, thanks for clarifying! —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Text overlay

@Useddenim: Further to the revert, the reason overlay is needed a lot of the time is because the transform function applied makes some of the characters just slightly over 5px wide in Helvetica/Arial at that font size, which means that they'll often mess up the row unless they're put in an overlay cell. I do think this should probably be explained at some point in the documentation. (The way you added the overlay in the example diagram was also incorrect because you didn't add d on the bottom layer.) However, there are not a lot of sans-serif fonts where numerals are wider than they are tall, and most people should be seeing a fairly normal font as the default sans-serif font in their browser, so I don't think the example as it currently is should be problematic. Jc86035 (talk) 08:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Collapse function does not appear to work on m.wikipedia

As of August 2019, RDTs that are set with collapse=yes (and do collapse in "normal" wikipedia) do not collapse when visited via m.wikipedia. (Compare, for example, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Coast_Main_Line with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Coast_Main_Line ). The effect of this fault is that visitors on mobile (cell-phone) can be confronted with pages and pages of detailed track layout and will probably turn away.

I suspect that I am reporting this in the wrong place, because I observe that the rolling stock detail from the infobox at West Coast Main Line is also showing as expanded in the mobile version. Could anyone advise? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@John Maynard Friedman: All collapsing within the page content is disabled on mobile, because the relevant JavaScript is not loaded. (While the mobile site does collapse every level 2 section on the page, this is a separate function.) There's nothing we can really do about this unless there's a convincing case for enabling it across the board. Jc86035 (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

XML Format?

Why isn't this markup to create the icons and all that in XML format? It'd be much easier to learn for my brain. Jimj wpg (talk) 23:53, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Because that would be yet another syntax to learn. It's bad enough with the two we have at present, one based on Wikimarkup, the other not. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Documentation

I am finding this very difficult to learn. For starters, is there a complete (or largely complete) list of the icons somewhere? I'll probably have a bunch more questions. - Jmabel | Talk 22:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jmabel: Wikipedia:Route diagram template and the navigation links at {{Bsicon}} are a good place to start. It's not a complete list, but it covers almost all use cases. Mackensen (talk) 22:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! Should I have been able to find those from the help text for the template? Because I sure didn't. - Jmabel | Talk 22:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

I get some of this, but I still don't seem to have my head around it. Could someone take a look at User:Jmabel/sandbox? I think it should be clear what I'm trying to do, and where I'm failing. If someone could fix it, I'm sure I'd learn a lot from seeing the diff. - Jmabel | Talk 22:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jmabel: done, see Special:Diff/910000216. Firstly: give more room for junctions vertically. Example: for "Coal Creek" I moved BS2+r one row down, and simple STR acts like a vertical spacer, same thing for "Taylor". Second: don't try to remember codes. I just stare intently at Commons:BSicon/Catalogue until I see the icon I need. Navbox at the bottom can be especially useful, click through to subpages. Every time I edit route maps I need to re-learn how corners are numbered, for example. Third: the only tricky part is the three-way under "Black Diamond". At first, I tried using kABZg23, but I couldn't figure out icons for corners for right and left branches to Franklin and Bruce. So started looking at Commons:BSicon/Catalogue/junctions/3-way, where I found ABZg23 ("Branch straight, to corners 2 and 3"). The next row after that is very straightforward — it consists only of STR code icons (although some are overlapped using !~) with different modifiers. The particular versions of STR I found at Commons:BSicon/Catalogue/branchings. With regard to documentation of Template:Routemap — it needs a section about icon separators. Information about slash, tilde-tilde, exclamation mark-tilde (is this all of them?) is spread across several sections and is hard to find. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

If you're not a fan of vertical spacers, other layouts are possible. Note, how STR+4 and KBHFe merged into KBHF4. I haven't figured out how to do the same for "Coal Creek" and "Taylor" though. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@Andrybak: I would say remembering the codes (especially the simple ones) is definitely a good way of drawing diagrams if you already know all of the icon types, although I'm probably biased since I've uploaded and renamed quite a lot of BSicons.

I've added an overview section to the documentation, which hopefully helps. I've also realized that the collapsible section code is a bit hacky, which is why I've commented out part of the overview table. Jc86035 (talk) 01:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jmabel: There should probably be a guideline written down somewhere for how to draw diagrams, but there isn't. Which sort of makes sense, since most of the complex diagrams have been drawn up by the same few users, but it's still kind of detrimental since we've probably discouraged a couple of new users by reverting them for not following various unwritten conventions (e.g. use {{Jct}} sparingly, omit level crossings for mainline railways).

While the current diagram would already be acceptable, there's probably a lot of missing detail that would be useful and there are some conventions that we'd need to follow. I think first you would have to decide whether you're drawing a service diagram (i.e. details like bridges and tunnels are omitted) or a line diagram (i.e. details like bridges and tunnels are shown).

Off the top of my head:

• Since part or all of the railway has been closed, for a line diagram it would be best to show either (a) which parts of the railway still exist and which don't, by using  (exSTR) icons instead of  (STR) icons, or (b) which parts of the railway still existed at a particular point in time (or multiple points in time, if necessary, usually by using multiple maps in the same container).
•  (INT) is usually reserved for large or intermodal interchange stations. If you just want to indicate relatively important stations, you should probably use  (BHF) and  (HST).
• If the railway has a main route – it seems to have one – then it would be better to indicate this by drawing the main route as a straight line through the whole diagram. Allowing it to curve out for branches is usually unnecessary unless the diagram is already really wide or there isn't a single "main" line at a certain point.
• If you want to save space, you can often overlay icons over junctions (e.g. d!~KRWgl\d!~lHST\KRW+r or KRWgl!~lHST~L\KRW+r!~lHST~R) or use icons with stations on curves like  (HST+4).

Jc86035 (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Alternate

Also, these might be useful for your particular diagram. I haven't edited your sandbox but you should be able to just paste these in directly if desired. Jc86035 (talk) 02:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks so much to all who helped, and especially to User:Andrybak! - Jmabel | Talk 03:36, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

And yes, I realize I'm a long way from ready to add this to an article, which is why it is in a sandbox! - Jmabel | Talk 03:39, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

You can also take a look at User:Useddenim/RDT MOS which, although still at the draft stage, contains a lot of styling information. Useddenim (talk) 09:46, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks again for your help. I cleared the sandbox, it is now at Template:Columbia & Puget Sound routemap. - Jmabel | Talk 14:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Asking for help on another

Template:Seattle & Montana Railroad routemap: almost there. One corner glitch I can't work out how to fill in; someone more experienced can probably do this easily. - Jmabel | Talk 21:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Done. This is the same as curved line above Franklin in Special:Diff/910000216. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! - Jmabel | Talk 06:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Unstated naming requirement for templates?

Take a look at Template:Seattle, Lake Shore and Eastern Railway (eastern) routemap. The V·T·E links don't work. I'm guessing this involves some unstated naming requirement for such templates. (I've had similar problems on a couple of others I've tried creating.) - Jmabel | Talk 06:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

The actual template name needs to be in |navbar= (sometimes it's the same as the header, but this is not usually the case). I've fixed it. Jc86035 (talk) 07:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Can’t we add a "skip button" that just leads to the next section? A diehard editor (talk) 23:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)