User talk:Jc86035 (1)

User talk:Jc86035
This page is a soft redirect.

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Jc86035 (1)/Delete this page, now! has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Delete this page, now!, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 08:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Delete this page, now!.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Adjacent stations

Please check your recent edits, for example, at Module:Adjacent stations. There are a dozen articles with script errors due to some problem. Johnuniq (talk) 09:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: Sorry about that; it should be fixed now (I haven't purged all the pages). Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I just wanted to let you know! I'll purge them now. Someone purged them. Johnuniq (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jc86035 (1)! You created a thread called Problematic edits at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving of Arbitration Committee Pages

Hello! I'm Cameron11598 and I'm one of the arbitration committee's clerks. I noticed you recently archived a thread on an arbitration committee page. Please note we have a bot that handles archiving for us, and as such manual archiving is unnecessary. Thank you for your attention in this matter. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 21:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cameron11598 and AGK: Thanks for your message. The reason I archived this manually is because the bot archival (AFAIK) relies on there being at least one signed comment in the discussion (which leaves a timestamp in the section). If no one comments, then the bot doesn't know that the section is old and can be archived. The section is currently four months old. Jc86035 (talk) 12:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite right, of course. Apologies, Jc – as the talk thread was undated, I didn't notice. Coincidentally, it looks like Cameron11598 created the thread in the first place. Clerk procedure is to create all noticeboard talk headers with a subst-{{hes}}, which works around the "one signature" requirement you mention. @Cameron: perhaps you would re-archive? AGK ■ 18:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The wiki listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The wiki. Since you had some involvement with the The wiki redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB 03:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]