Template talk:Navbox track gauge

Please correct

Template:RailGauge

1668 is really (5 ft 52⁄3 in)

Peter Horn 22:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3000 or 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+1⁄8 in) is really (9 ft 101⁄8 in)

121.102.47.39 (talk) 12:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3000 or 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+1⁄8 in) is really 3,000 mm (9 ft 101⁄8 in)

121.102.47.39 (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1980 is really 1,980 mm (6 ft 519⁄20 in)
1981 is really 1,981 mm (6 ft 6 in)
6 ft 6 in (1,981 mm) is really 6 ft 6 in (1,981 mm)

220.210.143.190 (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

10 ft (3,048 mm) or 9ft10.11in is really 9 ft 101⁄8 in (3,000 mm)

220.210.143.190 (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rail gauges → Template:Track gauge – Per Talk:Track_gauge#Requested_move. HTML2011 (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Why does it not work?

Why does Imperial work i.e. lead to "Summary" and Imperial not work i.e. not lead to "imperial (762 mm/2 ft 6 in)"? Peter Horn User talk 01:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial does work. Peter Horn User talk 18:41, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial should have read Imperial. Peter Horn User talk 05:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2' isn't minimum gauge

2' and 600mm are generally considered to be narrow gauge. 18" to 10¼" are considered, and referenceable via Heywood, as minimum gauge,but not above this. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian gauge

Bosnian gauge compare 760 and 760 mm (2 ft 5.92 in). It should perhaps be 2 ft 515⁄16 in. Peter Horn User talk 05:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Limiting the list?

Currently, Peter Horn is adding more gauges to this box [1]. Now the whole #List_of_defined_track_gauges has 248 entries. Would it be really helpful if all these are listed here? So far, I don't see much ov er view in a long list of lengthes. Could we find cut-off criteria? -DePiep (talk) 16:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Why does the latest revision 1,945 mm (6 ft 4+9⁄16 in) not show where ever this template is used in any article? Peter Horn User talk 01:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 01:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may need to purge the page transcluding the template, or wait for the software to catch up (usually a few hours). It seems to be working in (for example) Dual gauge. — Voice of Clam (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

However looking at your addition, it only points to a specific locomotive - I don't see the need for this unless there's a corresponding Dutch broad gauge article, in which case the template should link to that instead. — Voice of Clam (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]