Template talk:Infobox diagnostic

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles

Medicine

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles

Things that need fixing

Does someone know how to fix the documentation? Does not seem to displace the right info but displaces that from the disease infobox
The ICD9 linker does not work properly. The code for CBC is for example G0306 [1]
The emedicine data is not displaying properly. Here is the emedicine page [2] for CBC.
A line for "normal values" would be excellent

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes to address the above four points have been made to both the sandbox (see testcases) and the live version. Boghog (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow Bog you do great work :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:17, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, after certain changes made today, this template is now broken (see Magnetoencephalography for example), though I'm not yet certain if the problem is due to changes in this template or to subtemplates it references. Does anybody know what we'd have to roll back to get this working again? --Arcadian (talk) 05:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored this template to the June 6th version, and Magnetoencephalography is appearing fine again. Please do not undo this change without performing testing on affected pages. --Arcadian (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overly-complicated image code wasn't falling back gracefully. Sandbox code should be good to go again now. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 21:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-synced with sandbox. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 07:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added "based on" and "test of"

"Test of" would be what substance the test usually measures.

"Based on" meaning what other test does this one work on.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOINC linking

WHen you click the LOINC link now it produces terrible result. You must login to see the details. There is a better way to link. Can someone please help me change the linking to LOINC from a search to this linking: example https://s.details.loinc.org/LOINC/24320-4.html?sections=Comprehensive (so template like https://s.details.loinc.org/LOINC/<CODE_HERE>.html?sections=Comprehensive from current link that requires LOINC login to see the code details. Where and how can I make this change. Current pattern is https://search.loinc.org/search.zul?query=CODE-HERE e.g. https://search.loinc.org/search.zul?query=24320-4 EncycloABC (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have made the change you suggest here. Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Works much better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EncycloABC (talk • contribs) 19:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

move LOINC and MESH and other links to medical resources - out of the infobox

as with other infoboxes, I propose to move links to medical resources - and to be handled similarly as in 'medical intervention (new)'. EncycloABC (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MeSH URL

Hey folks; the URL structure of the NIH's MeSH Browser website seems to have changed. The infoboxes were leading to the search interface, and the ID wasn't taken into account. Because the template is only used on a thousand or so pages, I went ahead and updated the field to use the website's new URL structure, so that links now correctly lead to the topics. However, the MeshYear parameter is no longer taken into account (a way to include it in the new URL structure didn't come up after a cursory look). I'm leaving this message here in case people more familiar with the MeSH Browser know how to improve on my edit. guillom 18:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]