Template talk:ISO 639 name
Appearance
(Redirected from Template talk:ISO 639 name/doc)
Template:ISO 639 name is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Template broken (2024)
[edit]Template looks like it's broken. It's giving the following as an output: Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Language/data/ISO 639 deprecated' not found.
HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 14:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Two suggestions
[edit]Hi, is it possible to add two features?
- a link to Mozambican Portuguese and other variants of that language;
- a shortcut to {{ISO 639 name link}}
Thanks.-- Carnby (talk) 20:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 639 does not recognize Mozambican Portuguese. Not in ISO 639? not going to be added to a template specifically for ISO 639 recognized languages.
- If you want to create a shortcut (did you mean a redirect?) to
{{ISO 639 name link}}
, go ahead. - —Trappist the monk (talk) 20:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've just discovered {{Llink}}, seems to be fine. Thanks anyway.-- Carnby (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Mono language issue
[edit]There is an issue with this language, see the following:
{{ISO 639 name|mnr}}
→ Mono{{ISO 639 code|Mono}}
→ error: Mono not found in ISO 639-1, -2, -2B, -3, -5 list (help)
Gonnym (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- You must tell the template which of the four you want. The name must be exactly as it is listed in the ISO 639 data modules (for a list of them, see Module:ISO 639 name § Data mapping):
{{ISO 639 code|Mono (Democratic Republic of Congo)}}
→ mnh{{ISO 639 code|Mono (USA)}}
→ mnr{{ISO 639 code|Mono (Cameroon)}}
→ mru{{ISO 639 code|Mono (Solomon Islands)}}
→ mte
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 14:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for reminding me of this. Do you have any idea why
{{IPA|mnr|test}}
gets the non-disambiguated name (Category:Pages with Mono IPA)? Gonnym (talk) 14:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)- To get the language name, Module:IPA uses:
{{lang|fn=name_from_tag|mnr}}
→ Mono (lines 65–72)
- Module:Lang always strips IANA/ISO disambiguators. Module:IPA might do better to fetch the name from Module:ISO 639 name using the
|raw=yes
parameter:{{#invoke:ISO 639 name|iso_639_code_to_name|mnr|raw=yes}}
→ Mono (USA)
- also available to the template:
{{ISO 639 name|mnr|raw=yes}}
→ Mono (USA)
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is
_iso_639_code_to_name (frame)
meant as a module entry point also? It currently doesn't work like_iso_639_name_to_code (args)
. Gonnym (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)- Not clear to me why the code is written as it is. Usually, when I use an underscore-prefixed function name, that name (if exported) is for access from another module.
_iso_639_code_to_name (frame)
is not exported and because it acceptsframe
as a variable, would be a template access point. Mayhaps I got started on creating module access points and got side-tracked? Don't know, I'll give some thought to fixing that. - —Trappist the monk (talk) 16:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not clear to me why the code is written as it is. Usually, when I use an underscore-prefixed function name, that name (if exported) is for access from another module.
- Is
- To get the language name, Module:IPA uses:
- Ah, thanks for reminding me of this. Do you have any idea why