Template talk:Functionaries/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Template:Functionaries. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Update list
@DoRD, Callanecc, and Kelapstick: Could someone update this list, especially in regards to the former rights holders where it is not clear if they are still on the list? --Rschen7754 21:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- I will have a look at it this week, if nobody beats me to it. It's a rather confusing template to edit... I'm thinking of another section for former holders (who are not former arbs). But that takes looking at the mailing list subscribers, which isn't as intuitive as you would think. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- I was under the impression that former holders who aren't arbs aren't supposed to be on the list, unless that is a change in how things are handled. --Rschen7754 00:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'll have to look into that. Risker may be able to shed more light on that. Unfortunately this template seems to be the only on wiki list of functionaries. And you can't look at it without transcluding it. A table somewhere may be helpful (I may look at that as well). --kelapstick(bainuu) 00:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- I was under the impression that former holders who aren't arbs aren't supposed to be on the list, unless that is a change in how things are handled. --Rschen7754 00:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
I muddled the prior tags when I was updating the arbcom current and former lists. kelapstick and DeltaQuad were nice enough to cross reference everything to correct the list. Mkdw talk 08:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 September 2018
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove Alex Shih per [1] and WP:AC/N, thanks Hhkohh (talk) 15:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Hhkohh (talk) 15:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- I've removed him from the CU and OS lists. The functionaries list is related to the mailing list. I can check this at some point, as can other functionaries, but unless or until it's confirmed that he's removed from the mailing list we should presume he's still on it. I have however moved him to the list of former arbs. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:08, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Zzuuzz: Thank you. But you forget to update date Hhkohh (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Zzuuzz: Could you make sure the list is up to date, especially with regard to the former rights holders? Maybe there should be a cleanup as well, there is one name on the list who was desysopped for inactivity. --Rschen7754 18:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Who? If you mean Elockid they were still subscribed last time I looked. I checked the OS and CU lists today and would say they're up to date. I checked the functionary list on 14 March 2018 and made this list up to date with some provisos - there was one hidden user; there was one email address I could not recognise; there were some duplicate users (presumably changes of address); and one or two invalid addresses. I will check the list in the not-too-distant future, but I am not a list admin, so changes would need to go through the list admins. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Rschen7754: As promised I've checked the lists as of today. The CU and OS lists are up to date. The functionaries list is up to date with the following qualifications: One member of the list remains "private"/hidden to me - I suppose it might be an admin address or something; 2 users are listed with 2 email address each; one member of the list I cannot attach to any user - unless it's a duplicate email address they are probably not listed; and Elockid and Lankiveil remain subscribed. With those observations, the list is up to date. It will take a list admin to do any more. They are welcome to email me for the relevant info if they don't want to do all the checking themselves. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Callanecc: could you take a look and at least remove Lankiveil? --Rschen7754 05:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Not sure why this has taken so long, but I've now removed him. WormTT(talk) 13:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Callanecc: could you take a look and at least remove Lankiveil? --Rschen7754 05:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Rschen7754: As promised I've checked the lists as of today. The CU and OS lists are up to date. The functionaries list is up to date with the following qualifications: One member of the list remains "private"/hidden to me - I suppose it might be an admin address or something; 2 users are listed with 2 email address each; one member of the list I cannot attach to any user - unless it's a duplicate email address they are probably not listed; and Elockid and Lankiveil remain subscribed. With those observations, the list is up to date. It will take a list admin to do any more. They are welcome to email me for the relevant info if they don't want to do all the checking themselves. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Who? If you mean Elockid they were still subscribed last time I looked. I checked the OS and CU lists today and would say they're up to date. I checked the functionary list on 14 March 2018 and made this list up to date with some provisos - there was one hidden user; there was one email address I could not recognise; there were some duplicate users (presumably changes of address); and one or two invalid addresses. I will check the list in the not-too-distant future, but I am not a list admin, so changes would need to go through the list admins. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Edit-req
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I can't invoke proper editprotected form because my superpower just let me edit and not the "you cannot edit, do this editprotected" box.
I've just removed Guerillero's OS per arbcom request - you should take care of ML(as seen in above discussion) and this list.
Goodnight! — regards, Revi 15:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done Guerillero remains an eligible subscriber since he has CU and is a former arb. --Rschen7754 18:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 9 October 2018
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add AGK Stwalkerster to CU and add Oshwah Vanamonde93 to OS per [2] and WP:ACN, thanks Hhkohh (talk) 10:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'll let someone uninvolved handle this request. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sure we will do when the Stewards add the user-rights WormTT(talk) 11:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- I've granted those listed few hours ago. Rest of enwiki folks are waiting for WMF's IN. I'd understand if you wish to process everyone in one batch. — regards, Revi 12:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Worm That Turned, the above 4 was granted by steward revi, so it can be added and we have other 3 Hhkohh (talk) 12:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Which you had helpfully given me a link to... I've now done this. WormTT(talk) 12:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- But you do not update WP:CU and WP:OS lists, and also other three gained now, please update it Hhkohh (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging Worm That Turned Hhkohh (talk) 15:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Do not forget date Hhkohh (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- That cover everything? WormTT(talk) 16:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Do not forget date Hhkohh (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging Worm That Turned Hhkohh (talk) 15:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- But you do not update WP:CU and WP:OS lists, and also other three gained now, please update it Hhkohh (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Which you had helpfully given me a link to... I've now done this. WormTT(talk) 12:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Worm That Turned, the above 4 was granted by steward revi, so it can be added and we have other 3 Hhkohh (talk) 12:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- I've granted those listed few hours ago. Rest of enwiki folks are waiting for WMF's IN. I'd understand if you wish to process everyone in one batch. — regards, Revi 12:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sure we will do when the Stewards add the user-rights WormTT(talk) 11:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Happy new year
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
(change visibility) 21:14, 1 January 2019 -revi (A/S) (talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for Newyorkbrad@enwiki from CheckUser, oversight and administrator to administrator (SRP: -CU,OS per local arbcom request) (change visibility) 21:15, 1 January 2019 -revi (A/S) (talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for Euryalus@enwiki from CheckUser, oversight and administrator to administrator (SRP: -CU,OS per local arbcom request)
I think you know what I'm going to say :P — regards, Revi 12:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done Euryalus & Newyorkbrad removed from the lists - though it seems a bit WP:CRYSTAL to be acting on a change timestamped 8 hours in the future ;-) Happy New Year. Cabayi (talk) 12:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- and date (thanks to Hhkohh's prompt above). All OK? Cabayi (talk) 12:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Just realized... per Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#2019 Arbitration Committee it seems that they will remain subscribed to the Funct mailing list, so they should be re-added to Funct variable. Other than that, all LGTM. — regards, Revi 13:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- And Timezone... while my interface language is in English, my clock is tied to my home, so . — regards, Revi 13:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- I added to the former arbitrator in mailing list; of course, if any functionary/arbitrator knows they've unsubscribed they can be removed from that section. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Didn't see Revi's comment above and that per the announcement they've all explicitly been noted as remaining subscribed. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Cabayi Seems you did not Current arbitrators section Hhkohh (talk) 13:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Also ping Galobtter Hhkohh (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- and date (thanks to Hhkohh's prompt above). All OK? Cabayi (talk) 12:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- This needs further review, as the entire Arbs list is out of date. Also, James Alexander is no longer with WMF: is he unsubscribed? I may look at this later if I get the chance. --Rschen7754 00:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- See my update. I *think* that is most of the way there if not all the way there in terms of at least who has CU/OS being accurate. Someone else is probably better than me to check the list subscriptions. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not better, but I just want to note that I now happen to have a script which can easily check whether all three parts have an up-to-date list of users. As of today they are up to date (subject to qualifications I've made above about the mailing list). Anyway, before anyone wonders who's on or off the mailing list, or goes through the painful tasks of matching lists by hand, feel free to drop me a note. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 8 March 2019
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace <ref>On this project, checkusers are appointed by ArbCom.</ref>
with <ref>On this project, CheckUsers are appointed by ArbCom.</ref>
(checkusers -> CheckUsers) to match the capitalization in the other instances where CheckUser is written in this template. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:00, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Update request 2019-08-20
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update the list following the removals and resignations that had happened in the last couple of days. Thanks! (Yes I'm a TE but I'm not used to edit this template and prefer if somebody else did it for me, thanks). —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you sir. I see -revi dif some updates as well excluding mailing lists. I guess that needs to be handled in a separate thread or by the list admins. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- You're welcome. It doesn't take a list admin to see who's on or off the list, only (at a limited level) a member of that list. So as of today I can tell you that the mailing list is as up to date as it ever is. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you sir. I see -revi dif some updates as well excluding mailing lists. I guess that needs to be handled in a separate thread or by the list admins. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Update request 2019-09-22
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello. Please update the contents following the resignation of Timotheus Canens from the CU and OS roles (See archived Meta request). Thank you, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know the status at Funct-l so I don't touch them -- and they know if I touched this they'll need to touch on their own. Removed from CUOS lists. — regards, Revi 11:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 23 December 2019
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you add the new Checkusers and Oversighters that got recently appointed? See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=931656172#2020_Arbitration_Committee Interstellarity (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- For da recods: I didn't do it because I have no idea where they should belong as of the time I flagged them: They're not current "arbcom people" so doesn't fit in that section, and not all of them are previous "arbcom people" - thought "meh, let locals do it". — regards, Revi 10:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- PS: Didn't update the date when updating rev 932499525: That was my oversight () but I guess it will be updated with this editreq so probably doesn't matter that much. — regards, Revi 10:34, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- @-revi: How about adding a new category for now such as Future arbitrators? Interstellarity (talk) 23:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- ... or just wait five days ... * Pppery * it has begun... 02:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- @-revi: How about adding a new category for now such as Future arbitrators? Interstellarity (talk) 23:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Not done: New AC members have onboarding processes that need to be completed before they officially "become" functionaries. When the process is complete, one of the functionaries will update this. qedk (t 桜 c) 11:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 May 2020
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Unfortunately, we need to remove "Ronhjones (former OS)," from the "Advanced permission (CheckUser and/or Oversight) operators:" section, as he is deceased. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- To editor The Squirrel Conspiracy: sadly done. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 09:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @GorillaWarfare, Risker, and Doug Weller: (as the only list func-l admins who have edited this month): Could we take this opportunity to unsubscribe both Ronhjones and Elockid from the mailing list? Elockid has been entirely absent since 2016. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Zzuuzz: also sadly done. Should at least Ronhjones be added to WP:DECEASED? Doug Weller talk 11:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Ron Jones is already listed under 2019. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Zzuuzz: also sadly done. Should at least Ronhjones be added to WP:DECEASED? Doug Weller talk 11:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @GorillaWarfare, Risker, and Doug Weller: (as the only list func-l admins who have edited this month): Could we take this opportunity to unsubscribe both Ronhjones and Elockid from the mailing list? Elockid has been entirely absent since 2016. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Ombudsman commission -> Ombuds commission
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Not terribly important, but you might want to change [[m:Ombudsman commission|Ombudsman commission]]
to [[m:Ombuds commission|Ombuds commission]]
in the text for consistency (per m:Ombuds commission). Thanks!
— Luchesar • T/C 09:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done Nardog (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 19 June 2021
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
AGK no longer holds CU/OS. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Done firefly ( t · c ) 13:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 July 2021
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add TheresNoTime to CU/OS. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Done Primefac (talk) 11:58, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 29 July 2021
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
ST47 no longer holds OS. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 07:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 15 September 2021
This edit request to Template:Functionaries has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Mkdw no longer holds OS, Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 12:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done firefly ( t · c ) 12:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)