Template talk:EWS CORP

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ohio

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio articles

Companies

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Journalism

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles

Newspapers

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles

Could someone remove all the locations and crap from this template so it is more readable? --CFIF 23:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping The Template

I would like to see this template stay, does anyone know how hard I worked on it.

And, I'm not an experienced user...

I apologize for any inconvenience and I'm sure we can work this out in ways that both sides will consider to be comfortable... --User:WIKISCRIPPS2005 UTC 11:32 | EST 18:32 FRI FEB 03 2006

The Quality of the Template

Please leave the template as it is...

I would really appreciate it!!!

Thank you for your cooperation!!!

WIKISCRIPPSUltimate

SAT MAR 04 2006 9:15 PM EST / SUN MAR 05 2006 2:15 AM UTC

staff

Hi, I've no objection to the template in general but redlinked employee roll-calls are not really suitable for articles or templates. Removed accordingly. Any notable (WP:BIO) staff who have a separate wikipedia article could be added. Deizio 02:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out WP:CONTEXT for a guideline to redlinks. If these people are notable then by all means create articles about them. Bluelinked, notable personnel are absolutely fine, however an entirely redlinked list of people of unknown position and importance is entirely unencyclopedic. You clearly have an interest in this topic, and are likely an employee of the company, which is a particularly clear reason why you should be keen not to give the impression that you "own" the template. Template:News Corporation gets away with a much shorter list of staff with a few redlinked employees, however Scripps is not News corp, ditto the template for General Electric Co. I'm aware that several media and other companies have lists of mainly redlinked staff on their template, however it's very unusual not to see at least the CEO and a couple of others with articles. I've also been unable to find a policy or guideline which backs up your previous edit summary, I will of course have no objections if you could point it out to me. Thanks, Deizio 02:44, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So... 15 months and still not one bluelinked person on the template? Deiz talk 13:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]