Template talk:Did you know/A2 (Croatia)

A2 (Croatia)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know, unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle}

... that the Krapina–Macelj border crossing segment of the Croatian A2 motorway (pictured) cost €235 million?

Reviewed: Bitar Mansion, Hraschina meteorite

5x expanded by Tomobe03 (talk). Self nom at 19:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

5x+ expansion, Image, size, AGF for Croatian online ref, well-referenced. Instead of the ambiguous last section, use "the Krapina–Macelj border crossing segment", as in article. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. Correction made.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1: ... that the cost of the final 20-kilometre (12 mi) segment of the Croatian A2 motorway (pictured) was twice that of the remaining two-thirds of the route?

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules: Tony (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source:
Interest: Can we have some idea of the unusualness of this cost? Tony (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The segment in question covers about a third of the route and 2/3 of total cost even though the most demanding part of the segment was built as a single-carriage (though limited access) road.--Tomobe03 (talk) 02:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC) That's got the makings of a hook: could you have a go at an ALT1, then? Tony (talk) 04:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC) I'll give it a go later today. Thanks for the pointer.--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image suitability:
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length:
Vintage:
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP):
Neutrality:
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing:
Copyvio:
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Comments/discussion: