Template talk:Cite Earth Impact DB

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology

Template talk:Cite Earth Impact DB is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles

Geography

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Where do the categories go?

I think it's perfectly fine if you want to leave the categories in the template, rather than exporting them to the doc, the way most templates do. Sorry if I threw you for a loop. My main goal was to clear all the Category:Specific-source templates out of Category:Citation templates and down into their proper sub-category. I hope don't mind if I make just that change. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding categories is fine. Thanks for the help. The concern that I had was that the inclusion of cats from the docs had made two places the template was getting a different set of categories from. Since the docs are a subpage of the template and the template is the subject the categorization refers to, that should be the only place editors need to look for its categories. I hope that makes sense. It's about keeping it maintainable for future editors, just as your work is, but a different aspect of it. Ikluft (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

accessdate with no url error

This template can throw an accessdate with no url error (see, e.g., Kaali crater), which is visible to those who has such things turned on and adds the page to the maintenance category Category:Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]