Template talk:CBB schedule end

Template:CBB schedule end is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Template is being discussed at WP:CBB

There is a discussion about the use of this template at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball#Request for consensus: Team stat leaders in schedule tables. I encourage any users who are knowledgeable of this template to chime in. Thanks. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need multiple "region" and "regionname" parameters

The template needs to have at least three "region" and "regionname" parameters. Teams that make the Final Four of either the NCAA D-I men's or women's tournament will play teams from two of the tournament's four regions, while teams that make it to the championship game will play teams from three regions. I don't have the expertise to add it myself, and I certainly don't want to break the existing template. — Dale Arnett (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 27 January 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Per a request made seven years ago (that I agreed with), I have added functionality for up to five region names to be listed. Changes have been made in the sandbox and tested. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeding parameter

At a GAN for a team that played in the first NCAA tournament, the reviewer had a good point about the presence of the tournament seedings note here. The team in question was not seeded, since seeds were not used in the NCAA Tournament until the late 1970s. In other words, the note is meaningless for teams that played when the tournament did not have seeds, and having it in place might be confusing. I'm thinking that there should be a seed parameter in the template that would work like the rank parameter, meaning that when "no" is entered, the seedings note would not appear. Can someone who has the ability to format templates consider adding such an option? Giants2008 (Talk) 02:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 21 June 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The part of the code {{smalldiv|*Non-conference game... renders as a bulleted list. Per usage, asterisk symbol (*) denotes the non-conference games and this template must be updated to show the said symbol instead. Minor update is implemented in /sandbox (diff). – McVahl (talk) 06:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Primefac (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 14 February 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Added a break before region tags to prevent the end template from stretching for too long if there are multiple regions. Changes were made in the sandbox and tested. fuzzy510 (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Fuzzy510: are you sure that all the changes in the sandbox are your changes? In other words, did you sync the live template to the sandbox before making your desired edits? P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 20:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure didn't! Let me re-check. fuzzy510 (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Synced the template, then remade both my edits and the edits you made to the sandbox. fuzzy510 (talk) 21:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! and

edited. Thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 22:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank YOU! fuzzy510 (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my pleasure! Paine 22:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]