Template talk:Bible sidebar

Progress

This template needs work. --Striver 10:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template is popping up on articles all over the place, and invariably it's intrusive and detrimental to readability. It's just too long, too big, and, I fear, not really very useful - it duplicates internal links and categories. It should be deleted. PiCo (talk) 05:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we format class="wikitable collapsible" into this? I've tried, but it messes up the formatting. There's no room for this box at Ten Commandments, so I'm deleting it for now. kwami (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried too, but I don't know enough about the formating code, other than to copy and paste "class="infobox collapsible {{{state|<noinclude>collapsed</noinclude>}}}"" from Template:Christianity.—DocWatson42 (talk) 11:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Panbabylonism

I don't think this fringe approach to the bible deserves its own entry here. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gnositicism

Why does Gnosticism get an entry here? It's a view held by a tiny minority, and not particularly relevant to the Bible. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretations and perspectives

I just moved Muhammad from perspectives to Interpretations, but now I wonder: Where is the "line", is it even a helpful distinction in the template? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]