Template:Did you know nominations/Yuki Kawauchi
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of Yuki Kawauchi's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC).
DYK toolbox |
---|
Yuki Kawauchi
[edit]- ... that marathon runner Yuki Kawauchi shaved his head as an apology to his fans after a poor performance at the Tokyo Marathon meant he missed the London Olympics?
5x expanded by Sillyfolkboy (talk). Self nominated at 19:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC).
- Reviewed Arapian
- Seems to meet the guidelines for a BLP nomination. My only reservation concerns the structure, punctuation and wording, which I think needs work(?) Perhaps it could be re-worded, e.g. "...that Japanese marathon runner Yuki Kawauchi shaved his head as an apology to fans after missing the London Olympics, following a poor performance at the Tokyo Marathon?" Grant | Talk 06:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes it isn't quite right - I suppose I could drop the Olympic bit (it's not like it didn't have enough coverage) and just say: SFB 17:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Seems to meet the guidelines for a BLP nomination. My only reservation concerns the structure, punctuation and wording, which I think needs work(?) Perhaps it could be re-worded, e.g. "...that Japanese marathon runner Yuki Kawauchi shaved his head as an apology to fans after missing the London Olympics, following a poor performance at the Tokyo Marathon?" Grant | Talk 06:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Japanese marathon runner Yuki Kawauchi shaved his head as an apology to his fans after a poor performance at the Tokyo Marathon?
- Unable to tell whether Grant's comment on "structure, punctuation and wording" referred to the original hook only or the article as a whole. The new hook needs review, and the reviewer should check the article to be sure it doesn't have those issues. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- This article is well written, new enough and long enough. The hook is well sourced and it is ready to go with ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)