Template:Did you know nominations/XHLUV-FM

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

XHLUV-FM

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a 2014 attack on the radio station Calentana Mexiquense resulted in the death of the owner's 12-year-old son?
  Source: "El hijo del periodista y locutor Indalecio Benítez murió la noche de este viernes 1 de agosto en un ataque a tiros contra la estación de radio comunitaria de la cual es fundador, Calentana 98.1 FM. ... su hijo de 12 años murió luego de no recibir atención médica inmediata..." (The son of journalist and radio announcer Indalecio Benítez died this Friday night, August 1, in a shooting against the community radio station he founded, Calentana 98.1 FM ... [Indalecio Benítez]'s 12-year-old son died after not receiving immediate medical attention)

• Reviewed: Cylance Inc.

Moved to mainspace by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 19:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC).

• No issues found with article, ready for human review.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 19:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1925 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (0.0% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 110 characters
  • ✓ Raymie has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Cylance Inc. was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

• Good to go. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 10:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

• Leszek Jańczuk, "good to go" is not an adequate review. Please be sure to check yourself whether the article is adequately sourced and neutral, that the hook is properly sourced and neutral, that your own spotcheck confirms that there was no close paraphrasing (which a copyvio checker cannot do, even if it was sufficiently reliable), etc. As you've used the AGF check, you should also mention what aspects of the review assume good faith. Thank you for your cooperation. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

• Well sourced, written neutrally, no copyvio. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

• New reviewer needed to do a fully complete review. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
• Hook is short enough and formatted correctly, interesting, adequate QPQ. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

• @Leszek Jańczuk: I appreciate you wanting to review this, but I think a new reviewer was what was requested. Raymie (t • c) 06:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
• Still seeking a new reviewer; this station is nearing sign-on within a month and I'd like to get this article reviewed in time for that. I've also added a direct link and mention of the hook as is now standard for new DYKs. Raymie (t • c) 06:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
  • @Raymie: New enough and long enough per bot. Article properly cited. No copyvios found. AGFing on Spanish hook source. However, your QPQ review does not seem to mention any check for copyvios/close paraphrasing. Pppery 01:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

• • @Pppery: It's been nearly two months since that article was promoted. I can't exactly go back and change a review from two months ago, can I? What should I do? Raymie (t • c) 01:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
    • @Raymie: I think that in this case you would need to provide a new QPQ review, since you can't add to to the incomplete review promoted months ago. (Next time, remember to check for copyvios in your QPQ reviews) Pppery 01:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
      • @Pppery: I have done just that at Cliff Clinkscales. Raymie (t • c) 03:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
        • (on Spanish hook source), then (although your new QPQ does not mention whether the article is adequately cited, that is less of an issue on good articles). Pppery 11:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
          • Had it not been a GA (where it's already been reviewed as meeting those standards), I would have addressed that. Raymie (t • c) 18:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
            • Raymie, for future reference, every DYK review should start from scratch and check every DYK criterion, independently of any other review, including GA reviews. A number of previous GAs have had significant issues discovered during DYK reviews, from sources to copyvios. GA reviews are usually the product of a single reviewer, and have no guarantee of quality. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
              • I appreciate that. Thanks for clarifying. Raymie (t • c) 21:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)