Template:Did you know nominations/Cliff Clinkscales
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Cliff Clinkscales
[edit]- ... that basketball player Cliff Clinkscales' dribbling skills were featured on national TV before he was a teenager? Source: "He was featured by Slam Magazine, labeled a prodigy by the New York Post and appeared on the TV programs The Oprah Winfrey Show and The Rosie O'Donnell Show to dribble a basketball.[1]
- ALT1:... that basketball player Cliff Clinkscales drew interest from top NCAA programs before he was a teenager? Source: "Before becoming a teenager, Clinkscales received college recruitment letters from Kansas and USC."[2]
- Reviewed: Carnethy 5 (replaced with Template:Did you know nominations/Bajo Pivljanin)
Improved to Good Article status by TempleM (talk). Self-nominated at 23:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC).
- Newly categorized GA and current FAC. Spot checks for copyvio do not reveal any issues. The hooks, especially ALT0, are great, and both occur in the article and are cited. QPQ present. This should be good to go. Raymie (t • c) 03:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- @TempleM: The QPQ review you used does not mention copyvio checking (other than possibly the vague wording "within the guidelines"). Also, Raymie, your review is not complete as discussed on XHLUV-FM. Pppery 21:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Pppery - My QPQ review already passed, so I can't go back and change it. TempleM (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Pppery I still don't see any problems with this article. Every paragraph has at least an inline citation, the tone of the article is neutral (as is necessary for a BLP), and it's generally well done. Raymie (t • c) 20:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- @TempleM: The QPQ review you used does not mention copyvio checking (other than possibly the vague wording "within the guidelines"). Also, Raymie, your review is not complete as discussed on XHLUV-FM. Pppery 21:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Newly categorized GA and current FAC. Spot checks for copyvio do not reveal any issues. The hooks, especially ALT0, are great, and both occur in the article and are cited. QPQ present. This should be good to go. Raymie (t • c) 03:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)