Template:Did you know nominations/Wojciech Sadurski
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Wojciech Sadurski
- ... that according to law scholar Wojciech Sadurski, Poland is undergoing a "constitutional breakdown"? Source: Sadurski, Wojciech (2019). Poland's Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-884050-3.
- ALT1:... that law scholar Wojciech Sadurski says that the Law and Justice party has caused a "constitutional breakdown" in Poland? Source: same as above
- ALT2:... that hundreds of academics signed a letter opposing the "coordinated harassment campaign by the Polish ruling party" against law professor Wojciech Sadurski? Source: https://verfassungsblog.de/open-letter-in-support-of-professor-wojciech-sadurski/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/04/long-arm-of-law-and-justice-the-sydney-professor-under-attack-from-polands-ruling-party https://www.euronews.com/2019/05/13/critic-of-poland-s-ruling-party-pis-slams-political-motivated-libel-cases
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 23:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC).
Article is new, neutral and long enough. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports moderate text similarities, which result mostly from quotes. All hooks are well-formatted. I prefer ALT2. It is interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is sourced inline. QPQ was done. Good to go. CeeGee 12:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)- Comment and ping User:CeeGee, User:Buidhe. I worry that this article is much less neutral than the corresponding Polish article. On pl wiki, his biography doesn't even have a section about 'criticism', and is structured in the usual form (education, work, etc.). But our biography seems significanty focused on his recent criticism of the government. I think this is not 'best practices' as far as WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE go. PS. On that note I also don't think ALT2 is neutral and I'd prefer more tame ALT1/main. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- DYK hooks do not need to be neutral, only true. On reflection, I agree with CeeGee that ALT2 is the most interesting. Articles do not have to cover all information to be acceptable for DYK. It's true that Sadurski's recent criticisms aren't covered in the plwiki article but I would argue that they should be. (t · c) buidhe 04:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
