Talk:Wojciech Sadurski

A fact from Wojciech Sadurski appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that hundreds of academics signed a letter opposing the "coordinated harassment campaign by the Polish ruling party" against law professor Wojciech Sadurski?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wojciech Sadurski.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wojciech Sadurski is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that according to law scholar Wojciech Sadurski, Poland is undergoing a "constitutional breakdown"? Source: Sadurski, Wojciech (2019). Poland's Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-884050-3.
- ALT1:... that law scholar Wojciech Sadurski says that the Law and Justice party has caused a "constitutional breakdown" in Poland? Source: same as above
- ALT2:... that hundreds of academics signed a letter opposing the "coordinated harassment campaign by the Polish ruling party" against law professor Wojciech Sadurski? Source: https://verfassungsblog.de/open-letter-in-support-of-professor-wojciech-sadurski/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/04/long-arm-of-law-and-justice-the-sydney-professor-under-attack-from-polands-ruling-party https://www.euronews.com/2019/05/13/critic-of-poland-s-ruling-party-pis-slams-political-motivated-libel-cases

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Angela Russell (politician) ‎

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 23:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Article is new, neutral and long enough. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports moderate text similarities, which result mostly from quotes. All hooks are well-formatted. I prefer ALT2. It is interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is sourced inline. QPQ was done. Good to go. CeeGee 12:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment and ping User:CeeGee, User:Buidhe. I worry that this article is much less neutral than the corresponding Polish article. On pl wiki, his biography doesn't even have a section about 'criticism', and is structured in the usual form (education, work, etc.). But our biography seems significanty focused on his recent criticism of the government. I think this is not 'best practices' as far as WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE go. PS. On that note I also don't think ALT2 is neutral and I'd prefer more tame ALT1/main. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK hooks do not need to be neutral, only true. On reflection, I agree with CeeGee that ALT2 is the most interesting. Articles do not have to cover all information to be acceptable for DYK. It's true that Sadurski's recent criticisms aren't covered in the plwiki article but I would argue that they should be. (t · c) buidhe 04:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]