Template:Did you know nominations/White-crested turaco

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

White-crested turaco, Bannerman's turaco

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the white-crested turaco has a wider range than Bannerman's turaco, perhaps because it was able to adapt to new habitats when climate change reduced forest cover? Source: "T. leucolophus has maintained a much larger range, perhaps by adapting to savanna and submontane habitats."

• Reviewed: National Police Memorial (India)
• Comment: Don't rush to review this, because I plan to expand Bannerman's turaco and add it to the nomination. Now added. I have also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Shahdiz. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 14:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC).

• Both articles have 5x expansions around the appropriate dates, are long enough, sourced, free from plagiarism and otherwise eligible. The hook is interesting and of appropriate length. It is sourced and mentioned in both articles. However, there's a slight disconnect if I'm understanding correctly; the articles state that the white-crested turaco's range is wider because of the habitat adaptability, but this hook uses the word "perhaps". Is this in doubt or uncontroversial? Also, per supplementary rule H4, I believe you need to do a second QPQ. Thanks! — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 22:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

@Bilorv: Thank you for the review. I think the word "perhaps" should remain in the hook and have rephrased the article. I have done two QPQ reviews as indicated above. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Whoops, I only saw the second QPQ before. Thanks for the speedy response! This hook is now good to go. — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 09:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)