Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/What a Beautiful Name

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

What a Beautiful Name

[edit]
  • Comment: Request appearance on Main Page for 1/28/18 which is the Grammy Awards broadcast

5x expanded by Lionelt (talk). Self-nominated at 12:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC).

  • @Lionelt: I will review this article. I tweaked the hooks a bit for formatting. epicgenius (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I think your main hook is better. I struck ALT1 out. epicgenius (talk) 19:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

There are a few concerns, for instance:
  • In "Reception", words like "observes" and "points out" are words to watch. Use extra care with these words: if you mean "said", then use "said".
    • Fixed Reception.– Lionel(talk) 08:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
  • In "Other versions", Voices of Lee, the elite a capella singing group - elite by which standard?
    • Put it in quotes and added inline reference.– Lionel(talk) 08:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
But this is not a good article review, and these neutrality issues are minor.
You might need to copyedit this a little. I see grammatical errors like "it's" (for "its"), and some run-on sentences.
  • Grammar fixed. Run-ons fixed.– Lionel(talk) 08:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
QPQ: You need one because you have 16 previous DYKs, and a QP Qis required for more than 5.
@Lionelt: Thank you for fixing these issues. However, there are a few citation needed tags now. These all appear to be minor, since you can copy the citations from the "Charts" section. epicgenius (talk) 14:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
I used paragraph referencing per WP:CITEDENSE and removed the tags. If editor objects no problem to cite each sentence but I do think it's overkill.– Lionel(talk) 08:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
@Lionelt: That's fine. There's still one unsourced statement in the lead: the quote about the "genre-smashing single" (although you can just reuse reference #10, "The Year in Christian & Gospel Charts: Hillsong Worship & Tamela Mann Lead Lists"). epicgenius (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Oh! Ok, fixed. Thank you for your patience! – Lionel(talk) 07:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
All right, this is good to go. epicgenius (talk) 23:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)