A fact from What a Beautiful Name appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Don't know why you don't see the source material at Asker. All of the disputed text in the para is referenced to Asker. The reference is #[3], at the end of the para. For relevant policy see WP:CITENEED#When not to use this tag, bullet 7 . Here is a table comparing the text that you are disputing and the original source text from the source, which is Asker.
Disputed text
Quote from source
Source
"What a Beautiful Name" is ranked as the No. 1 song of the year for 2017 on the Christian Digital Sales chart
"Concurrently, "Name" is the No. 1 song for 2017 on Christian Digital Song Sales"
As you can see the para is fully referenced. Please do not re-add the tags. If you have any further questions let's discuss on talk.– Lionel(talk)03:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think I see the problem. There are two sources by Asker: [1][2], which I did not realize until now. The former is the one the one in the reference, but the first one in the references section is the latter provided here. Self-reverting. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
