Template:Did you know nominations/War Machine (film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
War Machine (film)
[edit]- ... that the online streaming media Netflix paid $60 million to buy distribution rights to the War Machine?
- ALT1 = ... that Netflix paid $60 million to buy distribution rights to the War Machine?'
- Reviewed:
Soon.1978 Gillette Cup Final
Moved to mainspace by Captain Assassin! (talk). Self-nominated at 09:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC).
- Comment - Not a review, but couldn't the hook be reworded thus: that
the online streaming mediaNetflix paid $60 million to buy distribution rights to the War Machine? LavaBaron (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Not a review, but couldn't the hook be reworded thus: that
Good to go technically. I moved the newly suggested hook to ALT1, and this is the hook I prefer. The other is acceptable, but verbose. References work, hook properly cited, Article works. Do we need a QPQ from this submitter? I get so confused with QPQs Fiddle Faddle 20:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- He needs a QPQ, Timtrent. You might want to change your to
in the interim. I don't personally care, but you'll spare yourself a concert from DYK's Hallelujah Chorus if you change it. LavaBaron (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- No need. A tick says that the nomination is ready for promotion; superseding it with the ? icon (at the left, where it's easily seen) keeps this from showing up as being ready for promotion while the quid pro quo review is still outstanding. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- The QPQ thing is remarkably confusing for those of us who nominate rarely and review rarely. I'm quite grown up and have always failed to get my head around it. Fiddle Faddle 22:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- He needs a QPQ, Timtrent. You might want to change your
