Template:Did you know nominations/Vjekoslav Luburić
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Vjekoslav Luburić
[edit]... that concentration camp commander Vjekoslav Luburić's wife divorced him after someone sent her an anonymous letter detailing his crimes?Source: Ličina 1985, p. 159: "U pismu mladoj kontesi stajalo je, uz ostalo, da su ruke Vjekoslava Luburića, njezina supruga »toliko krvave da se nikad neće dezinficirati«. U pismu je kažu, bio naveden i čitav katalog Luburićevih Luburićevih zločina i metode kojima je ubijao djecu u ... Jasenovcu. Izabela Sanitisteban nije mogla Luburiću oprostiti prešućenu prošlost: zatražila je i dobila razvod braka." ("The letter sent to Luburić's young wife stated that Luburić's hands were stained with so much blood that they could never be washed clean. The letter went on to list some of Luburić's crimes and the ways in which he killed children in ... Jasenovac. Isabela San Esteban could not forgive her husband for his past misdeeds and promptly divorced him.")- ALT1:
... that concentration camp commander Vjekoslav Luburić enjoyed taunting inmates as to the date and method of their execution?Source: Tanner 2001, p. 152
- ALT1:
- Reviewed: Feras Antoon
Created/expanded by 23 editor (talk). Self-nominated at 17:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC).
- @23 editor: I think that this needs some indication of just where and/or when it was. How would you feel about:
ALT1: ... that Croatian concentration camp commander Vjekoslav Luburić's wife divorced him after someone sent her an anonymous letter detailing his crimes?Or:ALT2: ... that Croatian concentration camp commander Vjekoslav Luburić's wife divorced him after she was sent an anonymous letter detailing his crimes?
- @23 editor: I think that this needs some indication of just where and/or when it was. How would you feel about:
- Could you insert the appropriate in line citation immediately after "... the killing of children."
- To my ear the reader needs a hint as to where and when he was a CC commander. I don't insist on this, but wanted to flag it up for your consideration. I add another alt below. Feel free to pick any one of them or to suggest another. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
ALT3: ... that concentration camp commander Vjekoslav Luburić's wife divorced him after she was sent an anonymous letter detailing his crimes?
- How about this, Gog?
ALT4: ...that Croatian concentration camp commander Vjekoslav Luburić's wife divorced him in 1957 after she was sent an anonymous letter detailing his crimes? 23 editor (talk) 16:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Very good. Excellent article btw. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Gog. It would appear that the nominator of the DYK I reviewed hasn't completed their QPQ. Does that effect my nomination? 23 editor (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi 23 editor That's a good question, and it is very honest of you to raise it. I don't actually know, and so shall alert Yoninah, who flagged up the issue with the article you had reviewed/are reviewing. To me you have carried out a review of an article in good faith, and are now following up on outstanding issues, and so I am inclined to call that sufficient QPQ. No doubt if Yoninah disagrees he will revert my tick and I in turn will have to strike this as QPQ
. We shall see. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi 23 editor That's a good question, and it is very honest of you to raise it. I don't actually know, and so shall alert Yoninah, who flagged up the issue with the article you had reviewed/are reviewing. To me you have carried out a review of an article in good faith, and are now following up on outstanding issues, and so I am inclined to call that sufficient QPQ. No doubt if Yoninah disagrees he will revert my tick and I in turn will have to strike this as QPQ
- Hi, Gog. It would appear that the nominator of the DYK I reviewed hasn't completed their QPQ. Does that effect my nomination? 23 editor (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Very good. Excellent article btw. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
ALT3 good to go. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2018 (UTC)