Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 13:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014

[edit]

5x expanded by Tiller54 (talk). Self nominated at 22:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Sorry to say it, but I don't think the first slot should be wasted on what is essentially a "B-roll" establishing shot. EEng (talk) 05:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry but I don't know what you're referring to (this is my first DYK nomination). Tiller54 (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • 16px I don't know what B-roll means. However, the expansion is not fivefold. The November 10 edition was 1480 prose bytes (or the Nov 11 edition was 1644 prose bytes). The current version is 4917 prose bytes. That is less than fourfold. If you can expand it to fivefold, the article can be reviewed again. Otherwise, the nomination will fail. --George Ho (talk) 06:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • How about now? Tiller54 (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I mean that having a picture of the state house doesn't really add anything. It's like when the news is talking about the president meeting with Joe Smith, but for some reason they don't have any footage of the president meeting with Joe Smith, so they just present a shot of the White House while the newscaster talks. (Don't think everyone at DYK is grumpy like me. I just haven't had my coffee.) EEng (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Would a picture of Governor Shumlin be a better option? Tiller54 (talk) 13:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I recommend skipping the picture altogether. EEng (talk) 14:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Okie dokie Tiller54 (talk) 20:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Over 9000 bytes which meets fivefold requirement. Time for someone else to re-review this. --George Ho (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Any update on this? Tiller54 (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough (or was new enough when nominated!) and long enough. The hook is uncontroversial and supported by many sources. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)