Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Valley, West Virginia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 01:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Valley, West Virginia

[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Caponer (talk). Self nominated at 04:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC).

This DYK? nomination appears to be good enough to go right now! Futurist110 (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Futurist110, your review here is incomplete and does not qualify as a QPQ for you. Please include details of your review, per DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.— Maile (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The QPQ is done already, and the article is detailed and sourced enough. George Ho (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Caponer's QPQ listed above is fine and qualifies for his QPQ on this nomination. The above note of mine was meant for Futurist110 not being able to claim this as a QPQ, as that editor's "review" does not give any details, so there is no indication a real review was done. I tweaked the wording a little, and hope I cleared things up. I surely did not mean that as any comment on Caponer's QPQ. — Maile (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC):
Must remove the checkmark from my review: I didn't realize that ALTs should be added. I looked at the hook and was unimpressed. George Ho (talk) 16:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Since there is not a suggested alternative to the original nominated hook, I've come up with the following two alternatives. Please re-review and certify one of the below alternative hooks--I'll be content with whichever the reviewing editor chooses. -- Caponer (talk) 22:28, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Both ALT hooks are mentioned in the article and sourced. Caponer's QPQ was done on Dec 23. Article moved from User:Caponer/Valley, West Virginia on January 16, 2014 and is 6,996 characters of readable prose. Dup detector run on sourcing found no issues. Every paragraph sourced. — Maile (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)