Template:Did you know nominations/Valentin Bliznyuk
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:41, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Valentin Bliznyuk
- ... that in 2006 a Tupolev Tu-160 bomber (aircraft pictured) was named after its chief designer Valentin Bliznyuk? Source in Russian but translated: "in 2006, the combat modernized Tu-160 missile-bomber (tail number "19") was given the honorary name "Valentin Bliznyuk"." ([1]), "Bliznyuk was finally propelled to fame in the late 1970s when he was appointed the chief designer of Tupolev's flagship supersonic project, the Tu-160." ([2])
- ALT1:... that Valentin Bliznyuk, chief designer of the Tupolev Tu-160 bomber, has a Tu-160 named after him (aircraft pictured)? .
- Comment: Trying to word the 'pictured' element to make it clear that it is that specific plane pictured, not a general view of a Tu-160. Suggestions welcome. Some great pictures of the plane in question at commons:Category:RF-94113 (aircraft) - these are also used in the article -
- Reviewed: Alphons Timmerman
Created by Spokoyni (talk). Self-nominated at 01:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC).
- Hi Spokoyni, review follows: article created 4 January; article is of good length and well written; article is cited inline throughout; the references appear reliable, I couldn't access the Tupulov article as the wayback machine is currently offline for maintenance, happy to AGF on these; all sources are Russian so overly close paraphrasing is not an issue; hooks are interesting, I moved the "pictured" on the last one to the other side of the question mark, but think I prefer ALT0; images are all freely licensed, my preference for either the first one or the last one; think we just need a QPQ here - Dumelow (talk) 10:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)