Template:Did you know nominations/Under the Dome (film)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Under the Dome (film)

(

)

... that the Chinese documentary Under the Dome, criticising China's air pollution, was praised by China's environment minister?

ALT1:... ~~that 150 million people viewed the Chinese documentary Under the Dome criticising China's air pollution within three days of its release?~~
Reviewed: Warren Elliot Henry

Created by FunkyCanute (talk). Self nominated at 12:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC).

. Length and date of posting the article are in order. No copy vio noted. QPQ done. Please fix the references at the end of the hook text in the article. Also, only ref 5 can be accessed and not the other two. Ref 5 says 147 million people viewed the film. Pl clarify and fix the references and the figures. Otherwise, the article is good and informative.--Nvvchar. 05:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks. I've changed 'more than' to 'nearly' in the article, and have struck through the ALT1 hook here. I'm not sure what you mean by 'fix the references': two of them need (free) subscriptions but they're valid and correct. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. As the ALT1 hook has been struck off, the original hook is referenced at ref 5. Good to go.--Nvvchar. 10:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi! This is a great hook and I was looking to promote it, but there is no inline citation at the end of the hook line. The next citation provided, source 5, does not contain the quotation "worthy of admiration" or the comparison to Rachel Carson's Silent Spring. It seems crucial to have this cited since this is the basis for stating in the hook that the environmental minister "praised" the documentary. Arthistorygrrl (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

That's now fixed. FunkyCanute (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)