The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Overall: The editor listed the article under April 3. The article was created April 4. This is important, the article only falls within 7 days if it is created on April 4 which is 7 days from April 11, the nomination date. The promoter can decide if they want to move the nomination under April 4. The article has two good hooks which are a good length, is inline cited, generally interesting, and neutral so the promoter may choose the one to use. The article is sourced and cited. Article is long enough and new enough. References are formatted well. No close paraphrasing or copyright violations. The editor has completed their QPQ. The reviewer finds everything in order. dawnleelynn(talk) 03:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@Moscow Connection: Please could you update the article to include the 2019 election results before this is promoted? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Since this is a general article about the elections, and a list with a link to each election is provided, I think this nomination is ready for promotion. Yoninah (talk) 21:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
The editor listed the article under April 3. The article was created April 4. This is important, the article only falls within 7 days if it is created on April 4 which is 7 days from April 11, the nomination date. The promoter can decide if they want to move the nomination under April 4. The article has two good hooks which are a good length, is inline cited, generally interesting, and neutral so the promoter may choose the one to use. The article is sourced and cited. Article is long enough and new enough. References are formatted well. No close paraphrasing or copyright violations. The editor has completed their QPQ. The reviewer finds everything in order. dawnleelynn(talk) 03:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)