Template:Did you know nominations/Me Too (Meghan Trainor song) (2nd nomination)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Me Too (Meghan Trainor song)

(

)

that Meghan Trainor removed the music video for her song "Me Too" due to unapproved photo manipulation of her body?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nay Salvatori

Improved to Good Article status by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 16:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC).

"unapproved photo manipulation" sounds like a snoozefest. How about ... that Meghan Trainor's body was retouched in her song "Me Too"'s original music video without her consent? feminist (talk) 06:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Fine with this wording as well, if you want to go ahead and approve that hook. :) —N Ø 07:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

I've noticed some problems with the referencing. Most of the first paragraph in the "Background and composition" section is not referenced. And the source linked at the end of the paragraph doesn't say "124 bpm" either, it says "120–126".
And another unreferenced sentence: "It eventually reached its peak of number 13 on the chart in its 11th chart week, becoming her seventh consecutive top 20 single." The first half is easily sourced (use this: [1]), but the "seventh consecutive top 20 single" part is not.
If the problems are solved, I'm willing to approve the nomination. By the way, I actually like the original hook more. It sounds more extreme. --Moscow Connection (talk) 23:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

I believe the concerns are addressed, Moscow Connection. To be honest, I prefer the first hook too.—N Ø 05:29, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!
Approving the original hook. The article was promoted to GA on March 11 and nominated for DYK on time. A QPQ is not needed. The hook checks out. --Moscow Connection (talk) 06:12, 5 April 2019 (UTC)