The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxtontalk 16:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Emphasis must be put on that the tips are not there to prevent sogginess, but are a by-product of preventing sogginess, which can make wording difficult.
Alt1 ... that chocolate tips in the cone of Trumpet ice creams are a byproduct of a measure that prevents the cones from getting soggy? Suggestion from Schwede66 16:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Not a review, but is it really unique to this brand of ice cream? I could have sworn at least some Cornettos also have chocolate tips, at least from what I remember. The hook itself is interesting to me, but I'm not sure if it's unique to Trumpet. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
You're right, chocolate tips are not unique to Trumpets. —Panamitsu(talk) 09:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
In any case, this is a weird case. I think the hook is interesting, but the fact that it's not unique to this brand gives me pause. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Given the issues with that angle, here are some possible alternatives; they can be reworded if needed.
ALT2 ... that the phrase "togs, togs, undies" was popularized in New Zealand by an advertisement for Trumpet ice cream cones?
ALT3 ... that a 2006 advertisement for Trumpet ice cream cones featured swimming clothing turning into underwear?
ALT4 ... that a 2006 commercial for Trumpet ice cream cones was described as New Zealand's most iconic summer advertisement?
Also, taking a look at the article, I would suggest the article be given a copyedit. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Narutolovehinata5, I've did a bit of copyediting. With the understanding that you aren't reviewing, is it possible that you have a look over the article? My writing needs improvement. No obligation of course. —Panamitsu(talk) 10:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Article is new enough and long enough. It is well sourced and neutral. No plagiarism detected by Earwig. Hooks 2-4 are interesting. I think Hook 2 is strongest (& I have struck hooks 0-1). ALT2, ALT3 andALT4 are cited here. QPQ is done. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. It is well sourced and neutral. No plagiarism detected by Earwig. Hooks 2-4 are interesting. I think Hook 2 is strongest (& I have struck hooks 0-1). ALT2, ALT3 andALT4 are cited here. QPQ is done. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)