Jump to content

Talk:Trumpet (ice cream)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 16:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Self-nominated at 09:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Trumpet (ice cream); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

In any case, this is a weird case. I think the hook is interesting, but the fact that it's not unique to this brand gives me pause. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given the issues with that angle, here are some possible alternatives; they can be reworded if needed.
ALT2 ... that the phrase "togs, togs, undies" was popularized in New Zealand by an advertisement for Trumpet ice cream cones?
ALT3 ... that a 2006 advertisement for Trumpet ice cream cones featured swimming clothing turning into underwear?
ALT4 ... that a 2006 commercial for Trumpet ice cream cones was described as New Zealand's most iconic summer advertisement?
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, taking a look at the article, I would suggest the article be given a copyedit. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Narutolovehinata5, I've did a bit of copyediting. With the understanding that you aren't reviewing, is it possible that you have a look over the article? My writing needs improvement. No obligation of course. —Panamitsu (talk) 10:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Review
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is new enough and long enough. It is well sourced and neutral. No plagiarism detected by Earwig. Hooks 2-4 are interesting. I think Hook 2 is strongest (& I have struck hooks 0-1). ALT2, ALT3 andALT4 are cited here. QPQ is done. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]