Template:Did you know nominations/The Convention Conundrum

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

The Convention Conundrum

(

)

... that James Earl Jones and Carrie Fisher appeared in The Big Bang Theory episode "The Convention Conundrum"?

ALT1:... that "The Convention Conundrum" was the first episode of The Big Bang Theory to credit Kaley Cuoco as Kaley Cuoco-Sweeting, after her marriage to Ryan Sweeting?

Created by Bilorv (talk). Self nominated at 09:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC).

I have now reviewed Saar status referendum, 1935, although QPQ was not a mandatory requirement for me (I have 0 DYK credits). Bilorv (talk) 12:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Review

New? Yes
Long enough? Yes
Within policy? Yes
Hook format: no problems
Hook cites?

Main: Yes;

Alt 1: Tagged with "better source needed" – from the non-reliable source IMDb: needs replacing if the Alt is to be used

- SchroCat (talk) 14:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

The issue with Alt 1 is being discussed at Talk:The Convention Conundrum#Kaley Cuoco-Sweeting: references. Any input would be appreciated - the conversation hasn't had a response in a couple of weeks. I am happy with both hooks, but would probably prefer Alt 1. Bilorv (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

I strongly prefer the original hook anyway. Is there any reason not to proceed with that version? It appears it has already passed Cat's review. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I've fixed the issue with Alt 1 now but if you "strongly prefer" the original then I see no reason not to go forward with that one. Bilorv (talk) 14:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm a little uncomfortable with the sentence as it stands, and certainly with the barelink refs. If you're going to rely on the episodes, then it would be best to wikilink the episode titles to the articles, and use a properly formatted citation. - SchroCat (talk) 12:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay, how about now? I've formatted it as a note and put refs inside the note. In any case, the original hook seemed like the one we were going to use. Bilorv (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Good to go, especially with the main hook. - SchroCat (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2014 (UTC)