Template:Did you know nominations/The Cambridge History of India

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

The Cambridge History of India

(

)

... that The Cambridge History of India would have had six volumes, but Volume II was abandoned?

Reviewed: Chippenham Lodge

Created by Philafrenzy (talk), Edwardx (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 10:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC).

Length and date ok. All refs are off-line, so no check for close paraphrase possible. This should probably have been nominated as 'not a self-nom', User:Edwardx has only edited a minor part of the article [1]. The hook claim needs a direct reference. Also, the section Volume V and VI lack reference. --Soman (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Fixed those things - please take another look. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, accepted AGF on login ref. --Soman (talk) 10:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)