Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Tête Rousse Glacier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 08:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Tête Rousse Glacier

[edit]
  • ALT1: ...that the collapse of the Tête Rousse Glacier in the Alps killed over 200 people in 1892, and that thousands still live under its threat to this day?
  • Reviewed: Aeluropus lagopoides
  • Comment: Citations are in the French language, but key facts can easily be found and confirmed with Google translate.

5x expanded by Parkywiki (talk). Self-nominated at 16:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC).

  • Hi Parkywiki, nice article! However, the lead contains information that is not cited at all. Please either add inline citations to the lead or, ideally, provide the same information, with inline citations, in the body of the article and rewrite the lead to only summarize the rest of the article. I also recommend wikilinking "St Gervais" in the lead, even though it's already linked further below. The information in ALT1 ("thousands still live under its threat") is not supported by the sources cited where this informaton appears in the article, but it is supported by source cited elsewhere in the article, so you may simply repeat the appropriate citation (e.g., the BBC article) after "to protect the 3,000 inhabitants in the valley below." — Kpalion(talk) 13:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Good advice Kpalion, thanks. I've restructured the article, repeating the reference I had used later on, and from which quite a lot of the uncited lead facts came from. I think this makes the article better cited and have added a couple of mountaineering guidebook refs. Other suggestions have also been taken on board and are fixed now, too.Parkywiki (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Kpalion(talk) 16:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Stub tags now deleted Parkywiki (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
And it's good to go! Either hook is OK and I don't have any personal preference. — Kpalion(talk) 17:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)