The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 12:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Overall: Hook is interesting and sourced, though I would prefer the "Buddhist monks and nuns" in the hook to be linked to the Buddhist monasticism article. Furthermore, the article was recently promoted to Good Article-status so there are essentially no issues whatsoever. Lefcentreright Discuss 13:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
@Lefcentreright: I agree with you about adding the link to Buddhist monasticism. I've changed the hook to reflect that. Hope it is ok to do that. If not, please undo that change. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Reviewing... Lefcentreright Discuss 13:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Hook is interesting and sourced, though I would prefer the "Buddhist monks and nuns" in the hook to be linked to the Buddhist monasticism article. Furthermore, the article was recently promoted to Good Article-status so there are essentially no issues whatsoever. Lefcentreright Discuss 13:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)