Template:Did you know nominations/Shit Museum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MPJ-DK 01:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Shit Museum
[edit]- ... that the Shit Museum is billed as the world's first museum dedicated to that subject?
- Reviewed: Birdsill Holly
Created/expanded by 7&6=thirteen (talk) and Pmaguire (talk). Nominated by 7&6=thirteen (☎) at 16:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC).
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 81 characters
- ✓ 7&6=thirteen has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Birdsill Holly was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure what the bot means when it says "0 QPQ reviews of Template:Did you know nominations/Birdsill Holly". I did perform a review, albeit it sorta bounced back in the queue after my full review. I have never used that review as a QPQ before, so maybe that is what it means. If there are problems let me know. I've got dozens of spare and unused QPQ reviews. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- You're fine, the bot seems to have had trouble with this nomination for reasons that are unclear to me. It attempted the review multiple times for some reason. Intelligentsium 20:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Mea culpa. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Recently and sufficiently expanded. No copyright violation (although some parts had me worried until I noticed the quotation marks). The hook is concise, simple, interesting and properly sourced. I'll see if I can find some images, but all in all, I believe this is good to go. Surtsicna (talk) 15:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
