Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Kaske

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Robert Kaske

(

)

... that in rejecting so-called "New Criticism," Robert Kaske argued that medieval poetry needs to be read in context? Source
- ALT1:... that Robert Kaske founded a medieval studies program at Cornell University, which soon became a leader among such programs in North America?

Reviewed: Percy Furnivall

Created by Usernameunique (talk). Self-nominated at 02:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ALT0 looks more interesting to me and is ready to go. Some general notes on the article: the lead really needs expanding to at least a full paragraph; and I believe it's standard practice to list just a few of an academic's articles/chapters/reviews (maybe 10 in total) rather than all of them. — Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 16:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

@Usernameunique: please take care of the lead so this can be promoted. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 12:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

@Yoninah: I'm agreed that the article doesn't comply with MOS:LEAD at the moment but I'm confused as to which of the DYK rules requires compliance with MOS:LEAD. Why is this a valid reason to hold the article back? — Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 12:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

@Bilorv: articles that appear on the main page must comply with all Wikipedia standards. Also see WP:DYKSG#D7. The goal is not to run things through the DYK process, but to make sure articles don't end up at ERRORS or with extra tags as soon as they hit the main page. Yoninah (talk) 14:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

That's just the same assertion again, not backed up by a rule. An article which complies with all Wikipedia standards is known as a "featured article". D7 doesn't say anything of the sort. Nevertheless, I've expanded the lead in this edit per WP:SOFIXIT, a much more productive approach than all this time-wasting and tag-bombing. — Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 15:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Bilorv. Restoring your tick. Yoninah (talk) 19:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)