Template:Did you know nominations/Red złoty
The following is an archived discussion of Red złoty's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Ashwin147 (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Red złoty
[edit]
... that red złoty (pictured) were the gold coins minted in Poland from the 1320s to 1831?
- Reviewed: Penn Symons
Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 07:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC).
- I'm making some copy edits and left you a question in the edit summaries. I think you should removed the dates from the book templates and leave only the year, and reference 5's title needs tweaking--I think the name of the publication is part of the title. Drmies (talk) 18:50, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed minor items, replied on talk. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- OK, but now the burden is the "1320s" in the hook: I don't see that the article says that those coins (before 1526, I suppose) were called red zloty. If I read this correctly it seems that they were introduced as part of a monetary reform begun in the 1320s--is that correct? If so, the article should identify our coin more clearly in its early stages. Drmies (talk) 14:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- The source does call these coins red zloty: Dukat Łokietka, przedstawiony tu w rysunku, jest zatem pierwszym "czerwonym złotym" polskim. - "The Ducat of Lokietek (Wladyslaw), shown in the illustration, is then the first Polish "red zloty"". I guess it's in quotation marks though. I do think a more involved hook would be good.Volunteer Marek 18:18, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- I just don't think the proposed hook is very sexy. Mightn't
"... that the last Polish red złoty were the so-called "insurgent ducats" minted at the Warsaw mint in 1831, on the eve of the November Uprising?"
be better calculated to catch the reader's interest, with flammable words like "insurgent" and "uprising"? Bishonen | talk 23:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC).- I like it :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the last Polish red złoty (pictured) were the so-called "insurgent ducats" minted at the Warsaw mint in 1831, on the eve of the November Uprising?
- :REVIEW COMPLETED - The following has been checked in this review by Esemono
_-_awers.jpg)
QPQ done:Penn Symons- Article created by Piotrus on March 14, 2013 and has 2305 characters of readable prose
- NPOV
- 1831 coin image is in the PD
- ALT1 Hook is interesting and taken AGF from the offline Refs 2: Zygmunt Gloger, Encyklopedia staropolska
- Every paragraph sourced, looks like reliable sources
- Earwig @ Toolserver Copyvio Detector found no copyvio
GTG -- Esemono (talk) 04:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note: no need to have two versions of the same hook, ALT1 and ALT2, one with "(pictured)" and one without: the promoter will remove "pictured" if it isn't. I've deleted the otherwise identical ALT2, and struck the original hook, which was not approved by reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)