User talk:Esemono

FA:

GA:

DYK:

Yes?

Archives

DYK nomination of Deadliest single days of World War I

Hello! Your submission of Deadliest single days of World War I at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help about making a GIF

Hi, i know it's may be a little bit weird, but I would like to ask you sth. about making a GIF similar to the one you made about the yugoslavian war. Which software do you use for making GIFs and how many seconds are between the pictures. Sorry for the bad english! Combi2000 (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend this site, as I've used it many times and the whole website is quite self-explanatory DestinyPegasus (talk) 00:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for My Journey into the Heart of Terror: Ten Days in the Islamic State

The article has been revised for grammar and punctuation and clarity. Please loop back to complete the DYK review. David notMD (talk) 13:39, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Deadliest single days of World War I

On 28 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deadliest single days of World War I, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 22 August 1914, the date of the Battle of the Frontiers, was the deadliest single day on the Western Front in World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deadliest single days of World War I. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Deadliest single days of World War I), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hello! Your submission of American Base Hospital No.57 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 10:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William P. Frye (1901)

On 7 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William P. Frye (1901), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the neutral American ship William P. Frye (pictured) was sunk by a World War I Imperial German raider, the German government was billed $228,059.54? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William P. Frye (1901). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William P. Frye (1901)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of battles with most United states fatalities

Hello! You have changed the list of battles with most U.S.A. Military fatalities putting Operatio Overlord on the first spot with 34.137 killed, but I am pretty sure that estimate includes other allied countries fatalities. The casualties section of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Overlord shows 20.688 US dead and https://pilgrimakimbo.wordpress.com/2009/06/06/the-casualties-of-operation-overloard/ shows 20.838. Secondly Operation Overlord is too “big” to be consider a battle/offensive, we can compare it with the 100 days offensive wich was a series of attacks. Making the Meuse-Argonne offensive(also known as the Battle of Argonne Forest) the deadliest battle in US history. Please correct me if I am missing something and show me your point of view so we can reach an agreement. Thanks! --Meyers guerras (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for HMS Blackcock

On 24 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMS Blackcock, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Blackcock. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, HMS Blackcock), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for American Base Hospital No. 57

On 27 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article American Base Hospital No. 57, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that from September 1918 to August 1919, when it left France, American Base Hospital No. 57 (operating room pictured) treated 8,505 surgical and medical cases, and 7,292 dental cases? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, American Base Hospital No. 57), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Camilla Hall.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Camilla Hall.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Esemono. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani/Archive1

A tag has been placed on Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani/Archive1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steel1943 (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Samuel Armas Aug19 1999.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Samuel Armas Aug19 1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Patricia Soltysik Bank Robbery.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Patricia Soltysik Bank Robbery.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 19:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MilivojPetkovic.jpg

The file File:MilivojPetkovic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NarcosatanicosAsesinos.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NarcosatanicosAsesinos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ValentinCoric.jpg

The file File:ValentinCoric.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for permission to use the 1878 Ottoman Empire map you published

Hi,

I need to use your map and add onto it two arrows and three oval shapes to mark the slave trade network into the Empire. This is for an article in the OSML series of the University of Bonn Press.

Thanks,

Ehud

Professor Ehud R. Toledano Director, Program in Ottoman and Turkish Studies History of the Middle East and Africa Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, ISRAEL https://telaviv.academia.edu/EhudRToledano http://tau-p-o-t-s.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottemp (talk • contribs) 22:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox sporting event organization

Template:Infobox sporting event organization has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox event. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flight of Refugees Across Wrecked Bridge 1950.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flight of Refugees Across Wrecked Bridge 1950.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pmbanner5.jpg

The file File:Pmbanner5.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raphael Gray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raphael Gray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Gray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Adnan Hajj photographs controversy/Archive1" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Adnan Hajj photographs controversy/Archive1. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 18#Adnan Hajj photographs controversy/Archive1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Certes (talk) 17:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Uboat.net" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Uboat.net. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 23#Uboat.net until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ghost boat" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ghost boat. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 12#Ghost boat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Acrassicauda 2009 Album - Only the dead see the end of war.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acrassicauda 2009 Album - Only the dead see the end of war.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 15:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aboriginal Provisional Government logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aboriginal Provisional Government logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HCMC War Remnants Museum

Template:HCMC War Remnants Museum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camilla Hall.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Camilla Hall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:59, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC for List of Computer Criminals

I have nominated List of computer criminals for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 18:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pmbanner5.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pmbanner5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red army soldiers raising the soviet flag on the roof of the reichstag with two Watchs.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Red army soldiers raising the soviet flag on the roof of the reichstag with two Watchs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Zoroastrianism:" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zoroastrianism: has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 18 § Zoroastrianism: until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Garibaldi Legion (French Foreign Legion" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Garibaldi Legion (French Foreign Legion has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § Garibaldi Legion (French Foreign Legion until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghost boat investigation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghost boat investigation, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost boat investigation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ProjectBillboard.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ProjectBillboard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox sporting event organization

Template:Infobox sporting event organization has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox recurring event. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]