Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Puertasaurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Puertasaurus

[edit]
Skeletal diagram of Puertasaurus, with known material in white
Skeletal diagram of Puertasaurus, with known material in white
  • ... that Puertasaurus, one of largest dinosaurs, is only known from four vertebrae? Source: Novas, Fernando E.; Salgado, Leonardo; Calvo, Jorge; Agnolin, Federico (2005). "Giant titanosaur (Dinosauria, Sauropoda)from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia." Revisto del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, N.s. 7(1): 37–41. Retrieved 2007-03-04.

Improved to Good Article status by Slate Weasel (talk). Self-nominated at 00:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC).

  • Hi there Slate Weasel according to the QPQ checker this is your first DYK nomination? is that correct? I will start to review this hook, I just need to be sure the tool is correct. MPJ-DK (talk) 20:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: No issues detected so far, I think that you picked an interesting fact - a huge animal identified by 4 vertebrae only. Once you confirm that this is your first DYK nomination I can approve it. MPJ-DK (talk) 21:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

MPJ-DK, how (other than saying it is) can I confirm that this is my first DYK nomination? --Slate Weasel (talk | contribs) 21:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
I'll take your word for it, just wanted to be sure you did not have a name change or something that'd throw off the QPQ tool. We are good and this is approved. MPJ-DK (talk) 21:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)