Template:Did you know nominations/Pooja Sharma (entrepreneur)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 20:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Pooja Sharma (entrepreneur)

(

)

Pooja Sharma being honoured

... that Pooja Sharma (pictured) was the first woman who stepped out of her home to work in her village? Source: "Sharma said she was the first woman of Chandu village to work and go outside the house."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Red Cross Diamond
- Comment: She lived in a village where going out to work was remarkable. This may not be surprising to you but it was to her village and this hook reflects this. Think it can be improved=> create an alt; See an error => fix it; like it => review it

5x expanded by Mujinga (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 07:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC).

Not a review but a suggestion -- the hook as written is utterly ordinary. Some contextualization is needed to convey why the reader should not simply shrug their shoulders and move on. Cbl62 (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
New enough and large enough expansion. QPQ present. GODL appears to be acceptable for the Main Page. Two items I'd like to ask about, @Mujinga and Victuallers:

Sourcing: Why do we have a Google Maps cite? Is it because the village lacks an article?
If we can't add context to ALT0, it may be worth a punchier ALT1 such as this one:

ALT1: ... that Pooja Sharma (pictured) started a bakery in a haunted mansion that employs 150 women?

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the prod SB. Google maps? Why not? delete it if it offends. Surely not an issue? Added more context to alt0, the hook was meant to be that it didnt have any, but maybe that didnt work. The haunted mansion is OK I suppose but every other old large building in the world is reputedly haunted .... and of course none of them are. Victuallers (talk) 09:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I'd approve the modified ALT0. Also tweaking ALT1 as an option. Note I had to remove a section someone added in good faith after my first review that appears to have been on someone completely different: Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that Pooja Sharma (pictured) started a bakery in a reputedly haunted mansion that employs 150 women?

@Mujinga, Victuallers, Sammi Brie, and Evrik: I'm reopening this as I have queried the status of the image at Commons. See c:Deletion requests/File:Pooja Sharma and award.jpg. I'm not an expert on this, but I'm a little skeptical that an image uploaded to Twitter conforms to the licence. If it's found that it's OK, it can be re-uploaded to a picture hook slot again. Otherwise, if the image is deleted, the hook can be used elsewhere in a DYK set. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 14:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

The licensing can be queried on commons I think if you are concerned, as there may be no expertise here (your link appears to not link). Being as the image is on commons with the correct license and loaded by an experienced editor some time ago should give some reassurance. The license depends on it being given an open license. The Central Indian government (like the USA) give open licences to all pics taken by its employees. The next problem is to prove that it is released by the right person. In this case we have a Twitter blue tag which proves it is who it says it is. There is nothing wrong with Twitter per se... and commons processes oversee this type of stuff. Victuallers (talk) 14:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

The license looks good to me. You can query it on the commons, but I see no reason (as stated by Victuallers), as to why there are problems with the image. --evrik ^(talk) 15:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

For me too the license is ok, it's under GODL-India and that's worked for other previous DYKs so I'm not seeing a problem here, although it's always good to check Mujinga (talk) 18:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Found the deletion request, correct link is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pooja_Sharma_and_award.jpg Mujinga (talk) 18:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Sammi Brie any thoughts on how to move forward with this? thanx! Mujinga (talk) 13:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

The image issue has been resolved so I'll be bold and re-add the tick Mujinga (talk) 12:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Under no circumstances should a creator or nominator tick their own article. New reviewer needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Why exactly is a new reviewer needed here? Sammi Brie made a complete review, then Amakuru queried the picture and went on to withdraw their objection. Surely it's good to go now. Mujinga (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I must have missed your initial ping. I will reaffirm my tick with modified ALT0 and ALT1 permissible. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)