Template:Did you know nominations/Periodization of Ancient Egypt
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Periodization of Ancient Egypt
- ... that the period names for Ancient Egyptian history, such as "Old Kingdom" and "New Kingdom", are modern inventions? Source: Schneider, Thomas (27 August 2008). "Periodizing Egyptian History: Manetho, Convention, and Beyond". In Klaus-Peter Adam (ed.). Historiographie in der Antike. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 181–197. ISBN 978-3-11-020672-2.
Paragraph starting: "It is crucial here to clarify that the structure given to the Egyptian past by modern Egyptology is only partly Manethonian..."
- Reviewed: Enrique Ika
Created by Onceinawhile (talk). Self-nominated at 23:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough (~2000+ characters, excluding lists / bulleted lines, and block quote), well written and clear, well cited and sources do match the content, no copyvio, hook has inline citation and is supported by the source, QPQ is done. Good to go. Bammesk (talk) 02:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
