Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Parry Glasspool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Parry Glasspool

[edit]

Created by Launchballer (talk). Self-nominated at 20:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC).

  • It's long enough, new enough and QPQ is done, and no copyvio detected. The article itself looks fine to me and meets the criteria, but the hook doesn't really make sense. Do you have an alternate? White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 00:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Jolly Janner, I think I have now addressed all the criteria; the article itself passes. The confusing aspect of the hook is also addressed. Personally, I think it'd be better if they changed it. I'm sort of tired of all the pop culture stuff on DYK, especially because I seldom watch TV beyond the nightly news. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 16:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • White Arabian Filly, it doesn't work to go back and change an original icon to something else when that icon has already been superseded (as it was by Jolly Janner's red arrow). I've added an icon here and struck the hook as too confusing: my guess was that "Parry air" was a bad pun referencing Perrier, which is wrong. Launchballer, if you want to get at the fact that the character "Harry" was called by the actor's name "Parry" in a scene and the goof was broadcast, there must be a better way of wording it than that. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Air in this instance can be read as 'broadcast'.
ALT1: ... that a cast member of Hollyoaks called Parry Glasspool Parry on the set rather than Harry (Thompson) in an error that was broadcast? --Launchballer 08:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • This hook works fine. It passes now. The article itself meets all the criteria: long enough, no copyvio found, QPQ done and was new enough when nominated. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 16:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but I still find this nonsensical. Jolly Ω Janner 21:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure "by another character" is strictly necessary, but I'll defer to Jolly Janner on that. I did strike ALT1. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, this reads well. I like the use of "by another character", but I have no strong opinion either way. Good to go. Jolly Ω Janner 01:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)