Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Captain Phasma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 07:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Captain Phasma

[edit]

Created by The Millionth One (talk). Nominated by Muboshgu (talk) at 17:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough. Long enough. No apparent copyvios. Interesting hook. Sourcing good. Reviewed article on behalf of The Millionth. Would only suggest alternative hooks. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:41, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  • For other hooks, I might suggest:
ALT1: ... that Star Wars: The Force Awakens character Captain Phasma was originally conceived as male?
ALT2: ... that Star Wars: The Force Awakens character Captain Phasma's creation was inspired by a rejected costume design for Kylo Ren?
They're the stuff that probably sprang out at me the most. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 21:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Those are both better than mine. I created a few nominations quickly while family weren't watching. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Love both ALT1 and ALT2. If I had to choose, I'd go with ALT2. DaltonCastle (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Just dropping by to say that I really don't like ALT1. ALT2 is much better. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
ALT2 will need validation and a "tick" before being promoted. Jolly Ω Janner 06:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Note that in addition to a full review of ALT2, Kylo Ren will also need a full review. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
New enough, long enough. Hook short enough and sourced. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found. QPQ done and image properly licensed. Good to go.--Launchballer 20:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)