Template:Did you know nominations/Pan Am Flight 923
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 07:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pan Am Flight 923
[edit]- ... that although Pan Am Flight 923 was the deadliest commercial aviation accident in Alaska at the time, the cause of the crash remains unknown?
- Reviewed: Sahara Hospital
- Comment: Referenced facts can be found in subsections 'Investigation' and 'Probable Cause'.
Moved to mainspace by Mukkakukaku (talk). Self nominated at 06:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC).
Date, size, refs, neutrality are fine. I added a cite request to the sentence with the hook claim "dedliest", once this is fixed ping me and this should be GTG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- The two adjacent sentences in that paragraph share the same reference: "At the time of the crash, Pan Am Flight 923 was the deadliest crash in Alaskan commercial aviation. Furthermore, it was the first crash of a Pan American four-engined aircraft." (Reference is the article called "Air Crash Kills 6 in Family.") I was under the impression that if two adjacent sentences share the same reference, they can be bundled into one to reduce clutter. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 05:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- On second thought I really don't care to argue the point. Sentences reordered so that the factoid in the DYK nomination has the reference on it directly. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 05:37, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- @User:Mukkakukaku It's not required but consider this. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Looks good now. GTG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)